More handpicked essays just for you.
Reasons why the us was justified usimg the atomic bomb
Reasons why the us was justified usimg the atomic bomb
Was the usa justified to drop the atomic bomb onto hiroshima and nagasaki
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Was The U.S. Justified? Did you know that after the annexation of Texas, The United States was going to continue its path of Manifest Destiny and take over California? Leading up to the Mexican-American War, the war was between the United States and Mexico in 1844. The war started when the United States tried to invade Texas from Mexico. The United States was not justified in going to war with Mexico because Mexico claims that the annexation of Texas was illegal and violated security reasons, the United States straight up attacked Mexico, and the United States broke Mexico’s law by bringing slaves into Mexican land.
Imagine being put in a predicament whereby you have to make a crucial decision, either by dropping bombs to save countless lives or to let the enemy proceed on brutally killing thousands more…What would you do? Quite frankly I feel that the answer is a “no brainer!” Harry Truman’s decision, the president of the US, on dropping atomic bombs upon Japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Japan was the one who first attacked the American Pearl harbour, and up until this time America was completely neutral during the war.
World War Two was a long extended period of fighting, Grief, and Death. Allied forces slowly gained naval and air fights in the Pacific. Soldiers had to deal with harsh rain conditions, Mud, and Humid heat. US soldiers were not prepared for the heat condition, and they had to carry equipment everywhere they went. The water and food supply was rationed to save food.
Some of the reasons why the United States should have used the bomb on japan is because the United states have given Japan multiple times to surrender and they refused each offer. So since President Truman believed that using the bombs would help end the war sooner. One benefit of bombing Japan would mean that there would be fewer deaths because if they were to continue to fight it out many more lives would have been lost. So since President Truman believed that this would make Japan surrender easier the first bomb was dropped over Hiroshima and then the second one was dropped over Nagasaki. Many people beloved that the bomb should not have been used on Japan and one reason why was because it did take the lives of many innocent people.
In August 1945 President Truman decided to drop two atomic bombs on Japan. The United states should have not of dropped the bomb on japan. There are several reasons the U.S. shouldn’t drop the bomb. The bomb hurt a lot of people, separated and hurt families, and destroyed homes and buildings. The bombings probably killed more than 200,000 Japanese civilians and maimed untold more.
During WWII there were many deaths and terrible battles but the worst of all of them was America dropping the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This tactic of bombing a city was the wrong decision by America, it was completely barbaric and was an act of total war something no country should ever use. The main issues with this decision was that it wasn’t an attack on a military base like Pearl Harbor but it was an attack on a populated city and Japan was prepared to surrender because they knew America and the Allied Powers would win the war. The main argument others have is that the Atomic bomb saved lives by creating a fast end to the war so it wouldn’t be strung out resulting in more deaths on both sides but Japan was prepared to surrender
Step into Hiroshima history, where the atomic bomb not only ended World War II but sparked a heated debate. Were the Americans justified in bombing Hiroshima? Is the question that still lingers to this day. The Americans were not justified in bombing Hiroshima, what did they get out of it, and what events did it cause to change the world? The United States of America was not just in the bombing of Hiroshima in a variety of ways.
The Dropping of Atomic Bombs on Japan, is an argument that still gets discussed in the present days. Historians disagree with each other about the dropping of the bombs being a justified action. There are many arguments discussing this topic, making some of them stronger than the others, more justified than the ones that appear weaker. Arguments such as saving lives of both sides, Japanese war crimes and shortening of the war are some of the stronger justified reasons. Though people argue that there are unjustified reasons, such as that there alternatives, that it was inhuman and that it was used to scare the Russians/Soviet Union away were some of the stronger unjustified reasons.
Why the American bombing, still the turning point in a WW2 history, cannot be morally justified? The Historic Reasoning The USSR declared war against Japan on August 8 to meet the obligations before the Allied Powers; however, unexpectedly, on August 6 and 9 of 1945 the U.S. Air Forces dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As a result, Japan signed peace treaty in the WW2 on September 2, 1945. Still the position of the U.S.A. was neither necessary nor sufficient to end the war this way.
Had American not dropped the bomb, then who knows what the world would be like today. America might not be allies with Japan. Japan is one of America’s closest allies. While there were alternatives, America was right to drop the atomic bomb because the bomb was dropped to end the war, the bomb saved thousands of lives, both Japanese and American, and the bomb was the only logical option. President Truman had only been president for twelve days when he
Vincent Wang 808 3/22/23 What is an Atomic bomb? An atomic bomb is a weapon with great explosive power that results from the sudden release of energy upon the splitting, or fission, of the nuclei of a heavy element such as plutonium or uranium, it was used on Japan during Hiroshima and many people think it was a war crime, do you agree that it unjustified or justified? I say that America was justified in using the Atomic Bombs on Japan. I think America using the Atomic bomb was justified, because first off the Japanese people wouldn’t stop fighting back until they were left with no choice, it showed that the Japanese had demonstrated , fighting to almost the last man on Pacific islands, committing mass suicide on Saipan and unleashing
Was America Justified in dropping the atom bomb on Hiroshima in August 1945? On August 6th, 1945 at 8:16 AM, a great yet horrific event in history occurred. This event is known as the dropping of the atom bomb on the city of Hiroshima, Japan, the event that would begin and end the pain and suffering of millions. The atom bomb was dropped by an American B-29 Superfortress bomber named Enola Gay and
Many believed that the use of the atomic bombs by the United States on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was to save American lives and to shorten the agony of the war. American policymakers and many historians believed that dropping the bombs on the islands of Japan have saved tens of thousands of American lives, the morality of its use was defensible. However, “if, as many critics suggested, the bomb was not needed to end the war or to save lives, then its morality seems highly questionable” (Walker). Indeed, the United States was not in need to use the atomic bombs to end the Pacific war. Oh clarifies this in his article by stating that “Japan would have surrendered even if the bombs had not been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the war, and
The United States decision to bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki in my opinion based on the Just War Theory was not justified, because the Japanese nationals were punished collectively because of the actions of their
“The Rape of Nanking did not penetrate the world consciousness in the same manner as the Holocaust or Hiroshima because the victims themselves had remained silent” (Chang). Many people remember World War II as the mass killing of many Jewish people by Hitler in Europe, but in fact, that was not the only terrible incident to happen during WWII. Nanking, a city in China’s capital had been overtaken by the Japanese Imperial Army who marched into the city of Nanking and proceeded to murder 300,000 civilians and soldiers in the city which was about half the population of the city at the time. In only six weeks, during December 1937 through February 1938, “this would become known as the Rape of Nanking represented as the single worst atrocity during the the Second World War
