ipl-logo

Was Germany Responsible For Ww1 Dbq Essay

1057 Words5 Pages

To What Extent was Germany Responsible for WWI?
Sources
The article written by W.E.B. DuBois targets the notion of imperialism in its role in the first world war, by giving in-depth insight on what a scholarly social critic had perceived on the true motives behind the war. Imperialism is directly related to economic benefits, and is a main cause behind the motives of the war. He also discusses the racial implications behind the war as well.
Document F was created by W.B. DuBois who hypothesized a claim regarding the war in 1914 about the role of imperialism in WWI. Although this was written in the context during the first world war, this article discusses the specifically discusses the causes of the war. This document is significantly valuable …show more content…

It is highly plausible that DuBois had written this to persuade the American audience to stray from war, thus having the possibility of framing his word choice and evidence to do so. This perspective from DuBois can differ from people in Europe because they are actually experiencing the war and DuBois can only view it through a foreigner's perspective. In addition, this article contains ellipses, which may have removed relevant information and downgrades the authenticity of the …show more content…

“... We shall maintain our position is that we realize that without power, without a strong army and a strong navy, there shall be no welfare for us.” (Document C). Germany used their sense of nationalism to strive as a country, and wanted to act as the active aggressor to reap the most benefits. “Do not intend to be the bondsmen of humanity... In the coming century, the German nation will be either the hammer or the anvil.” (Document C). To expand on this notion, Germany concentrated their powers against their common foe since the 1870s. Document A may support the notion that Germany was still holding animosity from the Franco-Prussian war, or Franco-German war because this was created by Von Bismarck who took actions to diplomatically isolate France. This alliance was to connect them with Austria-Hungary and Italy as a defensive act against French attack. In extension, the German general named Friedrich von Bernhardi states that war is the most beneficial action they can take to expand their country. To avoid acting as the “anvil or “bondsmen” of the European continent, they must take militant actions. To prove this notion, Document D, alludes to Frederick the Great, who lead the Prussian empire into several battles and was deemed victorious in every one of his battles. He did not necessarily have to go to war, but he did so and obtained many advantages. General Friedrich von

Show More
Related
220 Words | 1 Pages

Although the people during that time period thought that the war was going to end quickly, simply because it was between Austria and Serbia, the war surprisingly included many other strong countries because of nationalism especially regarding the Balkan colonies wanting to be self-governed. But meanwhile, after Austria-Hungary proclaimed war with Serbia, countries from the Triple Entente later joined into war in a matter of time. As shown in Document A: the European Alliances and nations are shown on a map. The nations then started to pick sides. Austria-Hungary and Germany formed the Central Powers

Read More
121 Words | 1 Pages

Imperialism, as an irrevocable phenomenon, facilitated the expansionism, conflicting interests, intense nationalism, and seething competition that enveloped the European continent at the beginning of the 20th century. Characteristic of the movement, imperialism fostered policies of colonial expansion and conquest, exemplified by the evidence of Source B. The German imperialistic career, beginning after the events of the Franco-German War in 1884, swallowed almost a million square miles and governed an additional 14 million people; the French Empire, after a revival of ‘the old colonial spirit’ conquered an area of over 3.5 million square miles and brought under its protection over 37 million indigenous peoples of these colonies; Italian, Russian,

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

Just to add on to even more causes of this specific war. There is one final reason that World War I had

Read More
1388 Words | 6 Pages

The ever increasing penalties of consequence for Germany greatly increased their anger and their cause to restore their pride. Before the start of World War One Germany already had a great military size and a booming economy to back it up, resulting in Germany being the number one power in Europe at the time. The people’s pride in their nation grew at a ever steading rate, however there was a dark side. Germany also wanted to show the rest of Europe what they could do. Seeing a great opportunity with Austria-Hungary and Serbia along with Russia backing Serbia up went to at war each other, Germany lept for it, eager for blood.

Read More
1323 Words | 6 Pages

Causes of World War I World War I was the bar fight of all bar fights and was expected to end quickly. Unfortunately, the treacherous battle field held soldier's longer than expected. At first, Europe had been flourishing with colonies worldwide and had developed in technology greatly.

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

In the late 1800s, Europe was scrambling to conquer vast amounts of land. Imperialism had swept the continent by storm, with many countries vying for pieces of Africa and Asia to control. From 1880 to 1900, Britain, France, Germany, and Italy fought for African possessions and by 1900, nearly the whole continent had been split and placed under European rule. There was plenty of motivation for Europeans to conquer the world, and while some supported it, others didn’t. Most people in Europe at this time held ethnocentric views toward the “uncivilized” cultures in the world.

Read More
239 Words | 1 Pages

I think of Lt. Jimmy Cross as a young man who wasn’t prepared to leave his loved ones to fight in a war. He left his normal life filled with regrets of not doing “something brave” (5). His young adult life was taken from him by the war. He had to experience things that no normal twenty four year old man would have to. He wanted to be in love with a girl and have her love him back.

Read More
738 Words | 3 Pages

Imperialism was a controversial idea that a nation can extend its power outward through means of diplomatic or military force. This often results in a shift of power from one major force currently in control to another. The people of that nation under control conflict may also experience wars, rebellions, or cultural destruction. Looking at some of these events, we see some positives and negatives of imperialistic action taken by the United States, and how it affected the nations imperialized by the United States. For starters, let’s look at Hawaii’s annexation.

Read More
1092 Words | 5 Pages

Germany. Before the second half of the 19th century, Italy was a collection of city-states that were only loosely allied with one another. In 1848 major rebellions broke out within the German confederation, inspired by liberals who envisioned a German nation ruled by parliamentary government. The Prussian military leader was Otto von Bismarck declared the beginning of the German Empire.

Read More
968 Words | 4 Pages

Otto von Bismarck used political wit and risk-taking to facilitate efforts towards German unification. Through Realpolitik, “...the pursuit of a Nation’s self-interest based on a realistic assessment of costs and consequences of action.” A political theory in which realistic, practical strategies are utilized over strategies of ideological or moral consideration. Because Realpolitik in a doctrine that acts in the self-interest of the state, it is qusai-nationalistic. Through Realpolitik, Bismarck gained significant leverage over Austria in the Schleswig-Holstein Question, the Austro-Prussian War of 1866, and considerable leverage over France in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-71.

Read More
1423 Words | 6 Pages

Had Germany not been a direct competitor with Britain as another empire, perhaps they might have been less willing to aid France. To the Great powers of Europe, Imperialism and overseas colonies were extremely important to the power of their nation. In fact, one German historian, Heinrich von Treitschke, said that “… all great nations in the fullness of their strength have desired to set their mark upon barbarian lands and those who fail to participate in this great rivalry will play a pitiable

Read More
141 Words | 1 Pages

For a war in which no one wanted, the causes of World War I have continued to astound historians decades after the war. While several schools of thought exist regarding the circumstances to provoke such destruction on a global scale, two prominent groups appoint guilt to major countries. Revisionist historians believe that other countries, as well as Germany, played key roles in beginning the war and attribute militarism, imperialism, nationalism, and the alliance systems among these countries for causing the war. Conversely, anti-revisionist historians believe that Germany is solely culpable for the destruction of World War I. While the results of the war, specifically the Treaty of Versailles with its draconian treatment of Germany, support

Read More
1173 Words | 5 Pages

In the next hundreds of years, it had experienced over and again remote wars and animosity, most as of late Napoleon's tenet. Be that as it may, Napoleon had incidentally done Germany two benefits during the time spent his tenet[ ]. Other than ingraining a feeling of patriotism in its kin, he had additionally combined Germany into 38 countries, a goliath venture in the direction of unification. Meanwhile Napoleon's thrashing 2 countries had sought authority of Germany: Prussia and Austria. The vast majority would have expected Austria, with its more drawn out royal convention and bigger region to overwhelm.

Read More
718 Words | 3 Pages

At the start of the 19th century, America was already expanding its territory. In 1803, the United States of America had bought the Louisiana Territory, it was bought from France which had made the country two times larger. In 1819 Spain had given up their territory of Florida to the United States. President Monroe issued the “Monroe Doctrine” in 1823, its main purpose was to warn the European countries to not enter the Western Hemisphere. In order for America to achieve its goal of becoming an imperialist nation they had conquered other countries economically, culturally, and with a strong military in the late 1800’s.

Read More
1309 Words | 6 Pages

After the last phase, the Franco- Prussian War, Bismarck acquired the desired territories. After each Blood phase, comes an Iron phase in which he does something sly and cunning to arouse political resentment. Although Bismarck ruled thinking the ends did not justify the means, he ruled Germany with only the best intentions for his country, “My aim from the first moment of my public activity has been the creation and consolidation of Germany, and if you can show a single moment when I deviated from that magnetic needle, you may perhaps prove that I went wrong, but never that I lost sight of the national aim for a moment” (Heuston 119). The result of his brilliant plan, Blood and Iron, was a unified and wealthy Germany in

Read More

More about Was Germany Responsible For Ww1 Dbq Essay

Related Topics

Open Document