ipl-logo

Was It Necessary To Win The Atomic Bomb

812 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Negitive impact of the atomic bomb

World War Two was a devastating moment in the history of the world. Many people died for their belief in a religion, dictators wanting to control the world, and the creation of the new weapons that can be used to attack others. The new weapons, to be more specific, was the atom bomb. The atom bomb had a code name; the Manhattan Project. The Manhattan Project benefited from extremely intelligent, experienced, and effective leaders. One of them being the famous Albert Einstein. FDR and Stalin warned Tojo( Leader of Japan) that if they dont surrender they will “prompt and utter destruction” will happen. Japan declined the surrender.The atomic bomb was dropped twice. One on Hiroshima, and the other on Nagasaki. This won the war on Japan, and ended World War Two. People to this day ask if that was a necessary action. The dropping of bombs was not necessary to win the war because Japan was already weak before the bombs, killed so many civilians, and the tremendous amount of damage that was caused. …show more content…

Japan was already facing problems from America because America was taking back the land that Japan conquered by doing a war tactic called, island hopping. After they got really close to the island they made raids with incendiary bombs by targeting industries. This tactic is called strategic bombing. This made it “impossible for Japan to carry on a large scaled war”(B). At that point Japan was weak and wouldn 't be able to continue the war due to the lack of resources that it had. As a matter of fact the government knew that “Japan was essentially defeated and that we could win the war in another six months”(D). There was no real reason to drop the bomb on Japan. They just can 't continue the war because their country would fall deeper into depression. Japan was too weak and the atom bombs was just a big screw you by the

Show More
Related
636 Words | 3 Pages

The death of numerous Japanese was the price for an end to the war and the ability to send Allied soldiers home-free. The bombs dropped were a strategic decision made by Truman himself to save lives, “We have used it in order to shorten the agony

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

Even though dropping the bomb on Japan was controversial it was the only way to end this war. Following, like what Justice Chamber said: “How to defeat an enemy that could not, would not admit defeat?”(Doc 3), Japan was different than any other country that US faced because Japan committed inhuman and selfless actions just to kill more US

Read More
1214 Words | 5 Pages

According to Document G, a memoir of General H. H. Arnold, whether or not the bombs were dropped, the Japanese were already on the verge of surrendering. The United States had already killed about 241,000 people, wounded 313,000, and destroyed about 2,333,000 homes, making it increasingly evident that their decision to drop the bomb was just a selfish and easy manner to end the war. The document also states that the air force was aware that the destruction of most Japanese industries and the prevention of the arrival of the incoming cargo had made it impossible for Japan to carry out a large-scale war. With this fact, the knowledge of their increasing vulnerability was in effect throughout the military and the white house, bringing to light the leverage the United States had going through with the bombings. Overall, the decision to drop the bombs can be viewed as unnecessary as the U.S could have kept fighting knowing that

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

Since the bomb was used it showed the world the mass destruction that can be caused so it could help prevent larger destruction. Document three was written by the secretary of war and states, “The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki put an end to the Japanese war” which stopped the rest of the violence between the armies (Doc 3). Death is a part of all wars but the choice of the bomb also stopped further casualties because it stopped fire raids, strangling, blockades, and the overall clash between the two sides. These two quotes demonstrate why the atomic bomb should have been dropped on purpose because the purpose of these quotes was to put an end to the war. The next agreement is that some citizens believed that the bomb should not have been dropped and other measures should have been taken to end the war.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

The deadly bombing on Japan saved the lives of many in America, prevented them from attacking the U.S like the one on Pearl Harbor, and it brought a sense of peace to the U.S. It is significant to the understanding of WWII because the events of the atomic bombs were the end of

Read More
345 Words | 2 Pages

The dropping of the bombs were necessary and fair due to the refusal of the Japanese to surrender, the millions of lives saved by a quick end to the war, and the warnings given to the Japanese. To begin, the Japanese soldiers have it ingrained in their brains that it is dishonorable to surrender. The author of Drop the Bomb as agreed by saying that “the Japanese have demonstrated a willingness to fight to the death”. During the war there were many times for the Japanese to surrender, but it was never done. With this in mind, they would have continued to drag out the war, which shows that dropping the bombs sped up the war which lessened the casualties.

Read More
216 Words | 1 Pages

It 's challenging to look back at events and understand the logic of using an atomic bomb without allowing one scrap of knowledge to creep into our decision making. All of this being said, it 's still possible to come to the conclusion that using this weapon was wrong. The belief that a military blockade would end the war wasn 't believed any more than a military blockade without invasion of Germany would work. The notion that Japan was teetering on surrender is silly.

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

Japan was weakening, “The food situation gradually becoming worse and worse…” Stated in source H. America had many industrial resources to use against Japan and so Japan had essentially been defeated. Japan pushed only for the sake of their countries honour as the shame of unconditional surrender goes against their code of honour. Furthermore a warning was given to Japan with America promising to drop the atomic bomb, however there was no evidence and so it could have easily been deemed a bluff. An American nuclear scientist stated, “A demonstration of the bomb best be made… Japan could then be asked to surrender.” This source seems somewhat reliable as it is from one of the American scientists and they would know the strength of the bomb.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

The Japanese should have stayed out of it if they didn't want bombs dropped. The end of the war was good news to us. We knew we were going home soon. Those soldiers with extensive combat experience in the Pacific theater and with first-hand knowledge of Japanese resistance also express conflicting thoughts about the bomb. All of them write of the relief and joy they felt upon first hearing the news.

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

World War II was a global war that lasted six years, involving the majority of the world’s nations. The war introduced some of the most frightening and highly developed weaponry in history and resulted in an estimated 80 million fatalities. During the last stages of the war, the United States dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Over 180,000 civilians lost their lives (American Yawp). This massacre left many people questioning America’s motivation for using such a destructive weapon.

Read More
555 Words | 3 Pages

The United States generals Dwight D. Eisenhower and Douglas McArthur objected to the use of the atomic bombs. Eisenhower expressed that the Japanese were ready to surrender and opposed the United States being the first to detonate such a deadly weapon. McArthur concluded that the Japanese had already been defeated and considered the use of atomic bombs militarily unnecessary. Many scientists protested the utilization of atomic bombs, including scientists who contributed to their development. One petition expressing opposition to the detonation of the atomic bomb contained the signatures of 155 scientists involved in its creation.

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

We even gave Japan a warning of the incoming bomb before it happened, like in document 5 “We call upon the Government of Japan to proclaim now the unconditional surrender of all Japanese armed forces, and to provide proper and adequate assurances of their good faith in such actions. The alternative for Japan is prompt and utter destruction...” (Potsdam Declaration) The Potsdam Declaration warned the Japanese of impending doom but still they fought on without the outlook to give

Read More
861 Words | 4 Pages

In the text, it states “Japan feared that upon surrendering the government to the allied states, they might change its form of government more so by doing away with the emperor who was so much respected in the state. Also, the Japanese did not like the idea of their soldiers being disarmed by the allies. ”This shows that the Japanese wouldn’t accept any offers to end the war which was the second reason it was the right choice to drop the bomb on

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

President Truman and his associates believed that if they dropped the bomb they would receive surrender from Japan. Thus, saving millions of American lives, and ending the war. Nevertheless, by saving American lives they would sacrifice thousands of Japanese civilians. They had other idea to have Japan to surrender, but were willing to take the one that would have the most consequences. They were thinking too much about the US instead of creating actually peace within the nations.

Read More

More about Was It Necessary To Win The Atomic Bomb

Related Topics

Open Document