ipl-logo

Was John Brown A Revolutionary

476 Words2 Pages

Have you ever wanted to make something that was unjust fair? Well probably not as bad as John Brown. John Brown was an abolitionist who lived before the civil war who wanted to abolish slavery so bad that he gathered around twenty slaves and tried to capture an armory but failed ultimately. The agreement about this between the South and the North is that he tried to abolish slavery by killing many slave owners , but this is where the views separated. The North thought John Brown was a revolutionary; however, the South thought he was a terrorist. John Brown was a revolutionary for three reasons, he was not fighting for his own personal little wishes, he was fighting for justice, and he knew there was a chance of death. The first reason John Brown is a revolutionary is he was not fighting for his own little wishes. He was fighting for the slaves’ freedom …show more content…

He was willing to die to make something happen, he went with a few men to conquer an armory, although he was not aware of the fact the probability of death was way higher than he thought because of his insanity, but he still knew that there was chance of death. The South thought John Brown was a terrorist. They state that he was evil for murdering a lot of citizens because some of them may have not treated their slaves that bad, and it is just plain evil to kill for no reason. This is not true. If they had slaves to begin with, that is already evil, and he killed people for that. So if the citizens were truly innocent in the first place, they would not have died because Brown did not kill people that had no slaves. So the statement that was previously stated was invalid. In conclusion, John Brown was a hero because he was not fighting for his personal wishes, he was fighting for justice, and he knew there was a chance of death. He was a revolutionary to the North, but a terrorist in the

Show More
Related
163 Words | 1 Pages

Treason, the act betraying one’s country or attempt to overthrow the government. John Brown did no such thing as a peaceful approach would gain nothing. Document B: Last Meeting Between Frederick Douglass and John Brown; Although the plan to attack a Federal Arsenal was “a measure to be fatal” according to Frederick Douglass. Despite the fact of taking the peculiar measures to end slavery, Brown still went through with his plans. When Brown and his men were either killed or captured people had mixed thoughts and feelings toward them.

Read More
334 Words | 2 Pages

John Brown Hero or Villain The story of John Brown happened many years ago, yet it still puzzles historians today. John Brown was an anti-slave abolitionist who was put to death after pleading guilty of murder, but is he considered a hero or a villain? John Brown is a villain for three simple reason, he murdered many different people, he attacked a federal arsenal, and he could be considered a terrorist. The first reason John Brown is a villain is because he murdered many different people.

Read More
346 Words | 2 Pages

John Brown was the first violent abolitionist. He showed the the North was not afraid to physically fight for their beliefs. He became a martyr for the North

Read More
248 Words | 1 Pages

The Revolutionary War wasn’t revolutionary because even though the British didn’t have control over the colonies, a lot of ideas and motives stayed the same. In document 6 where the African American valedictorian is giving his speech, he says he has no future because if he wants to get a job, white people won’t accept him. This was the same way they treated the slaves & African Americans when Great Britain had control over the colonies. Also in document 7 where Abigail Adams wrote about how the women should matter & not just the men. Women could not vote, be in the military, be part of government issues, be part of the government, etc.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

Brown chose violence which caused more harm than help. He made a plan to raise an army of escaped slaves to fight for their freedom. The thing he forgot to think about was how before when enslaved people used violence to justify their freedom, their lives became much more cruel. The plan in my opinion wasn’t thought through well enough to be able to establish anything. Therefore Brown was in total setting the enslaved people up for more violent treatments then at the time.

Read More
326 Words | 2 Pages

He saw the wrong in owning slaves. He believed what he was doing and what he believed in was right not wrong. He was hung with the pleasure of knowing he made an impact on the world. John Brown tried very hard to do anything to please god and free slaves.

Read More
208 Words | 1 Pages

John Brown was a man with a strong hatred for slavery who tried to lead a rebellion against it. After this he was called a “misguided fanatic” by Abraham Lincoln. Which leaves the question, was John Brown a “misguided fanatic”? I think John Brown was a misguided fanatic, or according to dictionary.com a, mistaken person with an extreme, uncritical enthusiasm, because he was so set in his rebellion that his mind couldn’t be changed even when told his plan wouldn’t go well, and although he was told his actions would be fatal he went on to do so . In The Life and Times of Frederick Douglass, Douglass states that there was no changing Brown

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

George Fitzhugh claimed that "The Negro slaves of the South are the happiest the freest people in the world." (Document H). John Brown a major person in the fight to end slavery "led a band of 18 men into Virginia to seize the federal arsenal there, distribute the captured arms to slaves in the area, and create a general slave uprising." (Document I).John Brown was executed and the aftermath of his death made tensions rise betwwen the North and South. "

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

Some might say that he was fighting for freedom, therefore he was a freedom fighter and his actions were called for because it was for a good cause. But someone who is really religious knows that murdering is wrong no matter what they believe in or what their opinions. John Brown murdered innocent civilians because they did not join him in his thinking and beliefs. He wanted to become a martyr and that is what he did. He was captured and died for his cause; if you look at modern terrorism that is what happens to most modern day

Read More
917 Words | 4 Pages

As a political zealot, he started a movement of a different approach towards antislavery and as a freedom fighter, he worked with those who carried similar beliefs in trying to help the slaves escape their harsh lifestyle. Despite other people who also believed that slavery should have been outlawed, they were not labeled as a terrorist. What differed from Brown’s political movements that seems to have lumped him in the category of a terrorist was that he, “personally directed and participated in the murder of five defenseless men”, but that does not necessarily make him a

Read More
377 Words | 2 Pages

John Brown played a pivotal role in pushing for the civil war to take place. The acts of terror he used caused tension between the slave traders, slave owners and those against the acts of slavery. He acted as the mobilizing agent who challenged those people who never supported slavery to stand by him and help end slavery in America by freeing them (Russo & Finkelman, 2005). His actions of killing those farmers who owned slaves and freeing the slaves agitated the slaving traders and owners, and in turn this led to the occurrence of the civil war between the anti-slavers and the slave owners. Therefore, this individual played the role of inciter and mobilizing agent for the anti-slave states to join in the fight for freedom of the black people.

Read More
278 Words | 2 Pages

John Brown is a villain for many reasons. He killed many people, including an innocent family. He killed the people who thought slavery was good, also so he killed people with their views and beliefs.

Read More
1522 Words | 7 Pages

John Garraty describes Brown as so deranged “that rather than hang him for “dreadful act” …. It would have been far wiser and more just to have committed him to an asylum” (Davidson & Lytle, p. 154). Another historian, Allen Nevins, takes the middle ground on Brown and states, “all questions except for slavery, Brown would act coherently and rationally” (Davidson & Lytle, p. 154). A more contemporary biographer, Stephen Oates, in 1970, said Brown was ““not normal” that he had an excitable temperament and was obsessed with slavery” (Davidson & Lytle, p. 154). Brown had a history of actions against slavery, five months earlier before the raid on Harper’s Ferry, “Brown led a band of seven men (including four of his sons) in a midnight raid on some proslavery settlers at Pottawatomie Creek” (Davidson & Lytle, p. 156).

Read More
455 Words | 2 Pages

Looking at what he has fought for, it’s no doubt that he fought for a noble cause which is the freedom of slavery. John Brown shouldn’t be known as hero or terrorists because of want he has done applies to both sides. John Brown shouldn’t be known as a terrorist or a national hero because of his violent attack and raids. After, September 11, 2001 John Brown has been called a terrorist which has caused controversy about Brown’s legacy and reputation. Furthermore, in the article, The 9/11 of 1859 says, “He led 21 men all but two in their 20s, and many of them radicalized by guerilla fighting in Bleeding Kansas, the abolitionists’ Afghanistan”(Horowitz).

Read More
974 Words | 4 Pages

Through his writings, Brown tells us he had no doubt in his intentions being for the better, choosing to ignore these lives lost as they didn’t serve to further his cause. Scott John Hammond tell us about John Brown’s calculated nature by comparing him to Machiavellian philosophies, a philosophy associated with the use of power in often ruthless means, “Given the fact that all founders and reformers will inevitably encounter resistance from those enemies … Machiavelli notes that a lawgiver … must go forth armed and prepared for struggle” and “A founder is consonant with the idea of virtue, or grandeur of soul - a character of extraordinary proportions, defined in terms of “ingenuity, skill, and excellence.”

Read More

More about Was John Brown A Revolutionary

Related Topics

Open Document