Caesar Augustus was and still is titled as "the greatest emperor of Rome to ever live." He lived from 63 BC to 14 AD. In 27 BC, the Senate gave him the name Augustus, which means divine, and that's where his title originated from. There are countless things he has done that prove how he was and still can be called the greatest ruler of all time. He was the first emperor of Rome; he reigned for 41 years and avenged Julius Caesar's, a.k.a.
Brutus who is a Roman Nobleman, he believes in the essential goodness from others around him. I believe Brutus would be a good leader for the assassination because he thinks before he takes action. A good reason for this is Brutus is a naive and honorable man. Another example is that he is truthful, he is respected by others of the Senate.
It’s debated whether Julius Caesar was a hero to Rome or a tyrant. Though many people considered him a tyrant there is evidence that he was in fact a hero to Rome. He helped Rome’s economy, fed the hungry, and efficiently protected people. The senate ran Rome poorly so he decided to take their power to attempt to make Rome great again. When the senate was running Rome, it was all going downhill since they didn’t run it well.
In the article “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman it says, “Julius Caesar had made himself consul for life, equivalent to emperor of Rome. To the people Caesar was more god than man.” The people of Rome believed in Caesar as being a great protector over their city. As a reader, Caesar is much viewed as a great hero due to his good deeds for his city. For example, Caesar governed the city of Rome better than anyone
Later on people began to catch on and realize there was manipulation behind his kindness that benefited himself becoming well liked and respected. An example of the kindness the Roman people thought they saw in Julius was that he gave many generous gifts, favors, and privileges to people who proved to be loyal to him. However, Julius’s actions were merely for gaining supporters who saw his generosity as the characteristics of a loving and caring leader. Julius manipulated the Roman people into thinking he was a good leader when in reality he used his fake kindness to gain the love of the Romans. Another thing that made Julius appear to be such a good leader was that he showed compassion and forgiveness towards people.
Although Caesar, as the upcoming ruler of Rome in Julius Caesar, should be portrayed as the ideal leader of the play, he actually has too arrogant of a character to be so. Therefore, Shakespeare places honor in Brutus and allows Brutus to have the role of the idealistic leader of the story. Although Shakespeare writes this play in a controversial time period during England’s political turmoil, he allows the audience to be able to choose the true ruler of loyalty to the crown or the honor of a noble man through the understanding of the two contrasting character
Furthermore that his military loved him and wanted to fight for him. Secondly Julius Caesar gives land to the poor. This shows he cares for everyone and knowone will rebal against him and there will be no problems. Finnally Caesar gave people gladiators to keep people happy. This was good because they like Caesar and trust him.
In the play Julius Caesar, Caesar was a hero for the people of Rome. He had just come back from war after heroically winning a battle. The people of Rome praise Caesar and offer him the crown. He denies it not once, not twice, but thrice times. The amount of self-pride Caesar has leads the conspirators, Marcus Brutus, Cassius and a few more men, to plot against Caesar in order to stop his power.
He was always courageous and persistent in battle, which made many individuals admire him. Similarly, Julius Caesar was a leader of Ancient Rome. In the beginning of Caesar’s reign, he
A successful leader must listen and respond to the needs and concerns of the people to gain their support. During Caesar’s life, he associated himself with the common citizens and aimed to improve life in Rome. Unlike other aristocrats who viewed the common people as filthy, Caesar associated himself with the commoners, shaking hands and speaking to them, simultaneously gaining further backing for his political campaign. Additionally Caesar constructed libraries, hospitals, shaped a more representative senate and granted citizenship to more foreigners (History Channel’s Julius Caesar’s Rome). Subsequently, by listening to the requests of the people and offering more benefits, Caesar gains their trust.
As the many of you have probably heard, Julius Caesar came back to Rome a few days prior to the horrid assassination that occurred. We know of the people who assassinated this great man, but we are still unsure how to wrap our heads around their reasoning behind killing great Caesar. Caesar was a great man with good intentions, unfortunately not everyone thought that he would be the best choice to lead Rome. As many may already know, a majority of the citizen voted and chanted upon Caesars arrival, but there was a selective few who were doing the complete opposite.
Caesar was a Roman general that was crowned king. Many conspirators thought that Caesar would not be a good king because many bad omens were happening before he was crowned. The conspirators killed Caesar. Caesar’s best friend was Antony who was disappointed about his death. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Antony uses the persuasive techniques ethos and logos in his funeral speech; he uses these elements to persuade the Roman crowd for the reason of Caesar's death.
“In using Julius Caesar as a central figure, Shakespeare is less interested in portraying a figure of legendary greatness than he is in creating a character who is consistent with the other aspects of his drama” (“Julius Caesar” Caesar). Though he is not widely liked he does have many faithful companions like Octavius or who Caesar thinks to be a close friend, Brutus. Caesar has many strengths and many weaknesses, but his greatest weakness is arrogance. This is proven many times throughout the book. Many times he talks about how he is an immortal being, and when his own wife begs him not to leave the house on the Ides of March, this was is the response: “Caesar should be a beast without a heart, If he should stay at home today for fear.
Julius Caesar was the Dictator of Rome in 42 BC who accomplished many things. Many people believed that he was a hero, but Julius Caesar was a very ambitious dictator and was more of a villain than a hero. Julius Caesar was a villain because he didn’t think first before doing something, he forced the Senate to name him dictator for life and he also was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. To begin with, Julius Caesar was a was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. Caesar used his power as dictator more towards his advantage instead of helping the people in Rome.
In public, Caesar was the leader Rome had always wished for, a strong, valliant man that would let nothing in his way. Consequently, Caesar had a more vulnerable side to him where the reader would be able to see glimpses of throughout the play. Still, Caesar allowed his public self image to take priority in which would eventually lead to his death. Speaking historically, the great Julius Caesar was a people’s leader with a deep hunger for power in which he would do anything to
