Was Martin Luther A Rebel?

A critic is a person who expresses an unfavorable opinion of something. A rebel is a person who rises in opposition or armed resistance against an established government or ruler. Martin Luther didn’t try to fight the church. He didn’t take direct action against it, and he didn’t try to force his opinions on anyone. Martin Luther simply told people his thoughts on the practices of the Catholic Church. He wanted people to question the institution that they based their entire lives on. He believed that the Catholic Church was corrupt and not a true representation of the bible, and he expressed that. What he didn’t do was use compulsion to convince people to destroy the church. People are entitled to their opinions, and they have the right

During this time period, people centered their whole lives around the church, and Luther didn’t think it was fair for people to do this without knowing what the church really believed. Martin Luther cannot be considered a rebel because he never actually did anything to defy the church. When he realized that his beliefs didn’t line up with the beliefs of the Catholic Church, he left. He may have asked people to remove the pope from his political power, but they didn’t have to listen to him. He never used violence or warfare to ruin the church, and he constantly spoke out against others doing so. Many people say that because the peasants began a rebellion based on Luther’s ideas, Luther himself is a rebel. Other people deciding that their beliefs line up with Luther’s and using those beliefs to condone violence doesn’t reflect Luther’s approval of violence. He had no control over how people decided to express their ideas. He never used violence, and therefore he is not a rebel. Martin Luther was a critic because although he publicly voiced his opinions towards the church, he never used action or violence against it and even asked his followers to refrain from using any kind of force with the Catholic