ipl-logo

Was Truman A Hero Or A Villain

1637 Words7 Pages

Harry Truman's presidency, which spanned from April 12th, 1945, to January 20th, 1953, was a time of profound controversy that has fuelled an ongoing debate regarding his predominant legacy as either a hero or a villain. This essay looks to comprehensively explore three major issues that defined Truman's career: the decision to use the atomic bomb, his role in the recognition of Israel as a sovereign nation, and the implementation of the Marshall Plan. By looking into these significant events, considering their historical context, and evaluating the consequences, this essay aims to shed light on Truman's complex legacy and offer a diverse understanding of his presidency, ultimately contributing to a more informed assessment of his historical …show more content…

Firstly, Truman’s decision to drop the bomb provides Great evidence to view him as a villain because His intentions weren’t really to protect Americans but rather scare the Soviet Union. Truman’s role in the decision to drop the bomb has persuaded others that he is best viewed as a villain because it was really done to frighten the Russians, not force the Japanese to surrender. Many people see the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as a good thing, it caused Japan to surrender, saved the lives of thousands of Americans and ended WWII, though many people see it as an act of evil for many reasons, Racing the Enemy: A critical look, is a book explaining the reason behind the bombings, in the book it states the reason for the bombings of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was “Primarily used to intimidate the soviet union and gain the upper hand in Eastern Europe.” This reasoning made many people see Harry Truman as a villain as the use of atomic bombs killing a total of 226,000 was just to scare the Soviet Union. Secondly, Truman’s decision to recognise Israel provides Strong evidence to view him as a villain because he did it as a ploy to get more Jewish voters. Truman’s role in the decision to recognise Israel has persuaded others that he is best viewed as a villain because he really did this as a political ploy to secure Jewish votes in a Presidential election. Following the aftermath of WW2 and the holocaust, many people sympathised with Jewish people and the horrors they faced, one of these people supposedly being Harry Truman, making his opinions known through the support of the creation of Israel and the recognition of it,

Show More
Related
1507 Words | 7 Pages

President Harry Truman was a successful president by definition. He was thrust into power as the thirty-third president of the United States after the rapid decline of President Theodore Roosevelt's health. This paper is organized around several major successes of President Truman, but mainly focusing on his twenty-one point plan of reform, also known as The Fair Deal, and the Manhattan Project. In regard to Richard Neustadt’s terms, a president should be evaluated on his or her ability to persuade. Put simply, it does not matter if any adversaries disagree if you are able to persuade them otherwise.

Read More
803 Words | 4 Pages

Was President Truman justified when he authorized the use of Atomic weapons against Japan? President Truman wasn’t justified in dropping the atomic bomb against Japan. The Japanese were close to surrendering, it was revenge for Pearl Harbor, and it was morally wrong to kill civilians. The first reason is that Japan was close to surrendering. According to Admiral

Read More
159 Words | 1 Pages

If I was Harry Truman, I would still drop the bomb, if we invaded conventionally, they would have a much better chance of winning. I say this because you can’t exactly stop a nuke. Also they shouldn't have surrendered, they should have been smart enough to have spy’s in the Manhattan project, but because they didn’t, for all they knew America could have 100 nuclear bombs. If we had not dropped the nuclear bombs, the war would have been a lot longer and there would be more casualties on both sides. I would definitely choose to still drop the bombs because it stops the war and scares the Soviets.

Read More
354 Words | 2 Pages

What Should Truman Do? - Vice Pres. Barkley You are Vice President Alben Barkley. In a moment, you and President Truman will be hearing from a committee of advisors regarding how America should end the war with Japan. As each advisor presents, take detailed notes on what they are recommending.

Read More
454 Words | 2 Pages

[Document 26.3, pg. 574]. Recognizing this bias tells us that the period in which this Doctrine was created was a time to “ensure the peaceful development of nations” and to, “make possible lasting freedom and independence for all its members” (Document 26.3, pg. 574). Truman was prompted to choose this course of action under threats from other authoritarian forces. It was a way to reestablish U.S. foreign policy and to provide political and economic help from the threats on the Democratic nations. The speech came after WW2 suggesting that many nations in Europe were open to attack, and

Read More
260 Words | 2 Pages

Stephen Eric Bronner analyzes how the Jewish Zionist movement shape the Protocols and reflect the ideologies that are challenged between the two during the rise of the anti-Semite movement. He argues the ideas in this pamphlet are a complete forgery, yet they “helped shape the mass movements, revolutions, and wars of the twentieth century.” (4) Chapter three of his book, Rumor About the Jews, attempts to explain the effort the Protocols make against the modernity linked to political anti-Semitism supposedly taking place at the hands of Jews and their reactions to it. Antisemitic ideology, Bronner states, in contrast to the Judeophobia of earlier times, “presupposed a denial of the Jew both as a person and as a Jew.” (59)

Read More
1677 Words | 7 Pages

I had familiarized myself with the history of the question of a Jewish homeland and the position of the British and the Arabs. I was skeptical, as I read over the whole record up to date, about some of the views and attitudes assumed by the “striped-pants boys” - the State Department (Truman, 1965). Clearly he did not agree with what his administration wanted to do. Truman would have been happy if the UN would solve the conflict, but that was not tangible. The UN was newly formed, but more importantly, no significant proposal could get past the General Assembly or the Security Council with American support.

Read More
816 Words | 4 Pages

While in the White House, President Truman was said to have been barraged with supporters of a Jewish state persuading and pressuring him to go in favor of the making of Israel. At the time, many countries including America did not want Jewish people living in their country. A couple were jealous of the success they were having on business. Even though many of us do not want to admit it, a lot of people know that the U.S. had a dark history of anti-semitism. Many Jews had wanted to come into the United States, but they were not allowed in because of the U.S. immigration quotas and even voted against letting Jews in America.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

On August 6th, 1945, The United States bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing many people. The president at the time, President Truman said that he only wanted to use the bomb in military warfare because it would hurt women and children. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was morally incorrect because the Japanese were ready to surrender, it was a crime against humanity, and it affected their physical self. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unsuitable because the Japanese were ready to surrender.

Read More
1861 Words | 8 Pages

During the end of World War II, few analyzed Truman 's choice to drop the nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Most Americans saw the unmistakable considering: the atomic bombings went on the war to an all the more important end. They didn 't have an issue with more than one hundred thousand of the adversary being executed. Taking everything in a record, the Japanese got America, and not the substitute way. In later years, regardless, particular have started to look at the good perspective of "Truman was sparing lives," driving hypotheses of their own.

Read More
1085 Words | 5 Pages

From their childhood to their presidency, the two went through similar situations while still having great differences that separate them. In the face of decisions that still impact the world to this day, these presidents both had to stand up and choose what they needed to do for their nation. Even if their decisions had no clear answer, they did their job as president to evaluate what the American people needed at that moment, and what would be the best possible solution to such a problem. Such a quality ties the two together and shows the major differences and similarities between both Harry S. Truman and Gerald R.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

President Truman was treating people even worst by putting them through the torture of the bomb and the resulting effects of the bomb. Time became a major factor into the decision, and dropping the bomb was a result of that fear. On the other side of the argument, the Japanese did bomb Pearl Harbor which was the catalyst that got America involved in the first place. We as a country should not need to compromise with the nation who started the battle.

Read More
1415 Words | 6 Pages

The Balfour Declaration and its overall impact on Jewish and Arab relations in the Middle East was very disastrous. The motives that influenced the creation of the Balfour Declaration by the British government in 1917 hurt the Palestinians. Due to the interest of the British government in Zionism and its goals, the British sought out the opportunity to take control and manipulate the Jewish population in order to secure a strategic advantage. The introduction of a Jewish homeland served various British domestic and foreign policy goals. In this paper I will argue that the immediate consequences of the Balfour Declaration resulted in the mass emigration of Jews who occupied and exiled the Palestinian people from their own land, laid the foundation for Jewish and Arab unrest, and further helped Zionism gain mass acceptance from Jews all around the world.

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

FDR’s accomplishment strengthening the power of the Executive Office by signing over 3,720 executive orders is absent (Peters n.d.). More importantly the executive order directly after Pearl Harbor rounding up citizens into internment camps is missing in his analyzes. Or, President’s Truman’s decision to drop two atomic bombs is not a factor in Truman’s presidential analysis. The greatest achievement of all is the strength these two Presidents brought to this office, whether one likes it or

Read More
2080 Words | 9 Pages

Honestly speaking I believe that if Truman didn’t drop the bomb on japan then many lives would have been saved, but on the other hand, I would definitely agree to his decision in dropping the bomb on japan, this is mainly because by harry Truman declaring a drop of the atomic bomb on to japan, made japan surrender and ended war even faster ,compared to a different solution in resolving the war. Similarly we are able to visualize that as the first bomb was put off on the city of Hiroshima on the 6th of august 1945 and the second being put off on the city of Nagasaki on the 9th of august 1945, through this we realized that japan surrender faster. Correspondingly, by Truman deciding to dropping the bomb ,Truman was able to stop the USSR from developing any further principles and spreading these principles amongst themselves. In my opinion I believe that by Truman making a wise choice of dropping the bomb he was able to put an end to the criticism of US by other countries, moreover through this he didn’t let the 2 billion dollars that was spend on the hard work and research of the bomb go to a total waste and therefore, he used it in a more wise and intellectual way

Read More

More about Was Truman A Hero Or A Villain

Related Topics

Open Document