Watergate Scandal Summary

In the past, communities throughout the world had either witnessed an event, a person, or an organization that not only improved the relationship between law enforcement and communities, it reduced poverty, crime, and other hardships affecting their area. However, there are times where they take it to their own hands to make a statement regarding to the harsh environment or treatment afflicting communities; for example, sexual harassments, brutality, racial profiling, etc. When this type of scenario happens, it eventually leads to a mass protest or riot that happens on public or private property to make leaders from government and private sector to be heard. Out of many previous and current figures or events that the author has researched regarding

According to Maranzani (2017), FISA has not only been amended significantly in the last four decades since Watergate, there were similar acts where it expanded the perimeters of surveillance; i.e. 2001 USA Patriot Act, 2007 Protect America Act, etc. Many acts have been passed and signed by previous administrations to not only give federal agencies to combat terrorism, it was to utilize the tools on suspected individuals or groups without violating one’s constitution rights; i.e. wiretapping, surveillance, etc. (Maranzani, 2017). The Watergate Scandal had a long-term effect of how the federal government including the executive branch utilize surveillance techniques or tools without infringing one’s rights. Since the aftermath of the scandal, many journalists have jaded view towards the Republican party believing that all Republicans could be or the next Richard Nixon. Furthermore, journalists with strong ties to mainstream media gives negative publicity toward the Republican party while they give positive publicity towards the Democrat Party regarding to any event that happens between both parties. This reason alone not only divides communities throughout the country, it creates a group of people relied on the mainstream media too much where everything they say either on newspaper, TV, internet, or radio is 100% true. Thus, it creates what many people would label them as low informative