Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Animal cruelty in experiments
Ethics for testing animals
Animal cruelty in experiments
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Animal cruelty in experiments
Ethics for testing animals
Animal cruelty in experiments
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Animal cruelty in experiments
Critics have claimed that the results from an animal cannot generalize over to people, and while this can be true, assumptions about human behavior based on animal research takes into consideration data from descriptive as well as experimental studies with people. The second objection to animal research is that it has no practical value as the research only provides facts that are only useful to a theoretician. While this might sometimes be the case the findings from animal research have been able to be put to good use in topics such as child rearing, sports, and education. Lastly, many critics are quick to say that animal research is unethical as people have no more right to experiment on animals as animals have to experiment on people. While there are ethical concerns that should be taken seriously these concerns beg the question of if it is unethical to use animals in research what about eating them, what about forcing them to be our pets or what about using animals on
When considering the rational for this experiment it is necessary to discuss it’s ethical implications. Rather than trying to understand why Project Nim was deemed so important that it justified experimenting on an animal it is more accurate to state that before Project Nim, experiments such as this one didn’t undergo the same scrutiny as they would now due to the prevailing thought that animals such as Nim were not deemed sentient beings. Conversely, project Nim opened people’s minds to the idea that animals should have rights, including legal protection from research.
Every year several million animals die due to animal testing in for medical, psychological, and products research. Moreover, animal testing is something that shouldn’t be continued and for it is completely wrong and cruel. Animal testing started in the late 300’s BC. Aristotle and Erasistratus performed many experiments that involved living animals. Similarly, Galen, a greek physician, conducted animals research to explore the field of anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology.
Animal testing has been a subject of controversy for many years and there have been some great discoveries because of it, however, has this practice been done ethically? For a cosmetic company to inject rabbit’s eyes of chemicals, thus causing it pain, is unethical and immoral. This practice negates the theory of Kant’s Practical Imperative, where animals are used for experiments, not only for life and death experiments, but for experiments that indicates whether a product has irritating side effects for humans, for example (Thiroux & Krasemann, 2015). The immorality of this practice is where scientists are subjecting pain and sometimes torture to animals for results to tests. It is immoral, as Kant suggests, to subject sentient beings to pain
Their arguments only help to restate the goals of animal psychology: to study animal behavior. Studying nonhuman animal behavior works best when following the outline of Behaviorism psychology. Behaviorism can be defined as, “the study of how accumulated experiences shape the behavior
They are capable of experiencing different emotions, such as fear, joy, and love, as well as pain, suffering, or other negative feelings. It is only reasonable to acknowledge their inherent value and their right to be accorded respect, dignity, and compassion in light of these abilities. Also, just as we have a moral obligation to defend the rights of other people, it is our duty as humans to support the welfare of animals and prevent their exploitation. By not doing so, we are sustaining an oppressive system that undercuts the moral ideals of fairness, empathy, and equality. Research on animal sentience and cognition, which has demonstrated that many animals have complex emotional lives and social relationships, is another source of evidence.
He points out that so-called pain-behaviour is neither necessary nor sufficient for the experience of pain. It is not necessary because the best policy in some instances might be to not show that they are in pain. It is not sufficient since amoebas engage in pain behaviour, but we do not believe that they can feel pain. Likewise, we could easily program robots to engage in pain-behaviour, but we would not conclude that they feel pain. The similarity of animal and human physical structures is inconclusive because we have no idea how, or even if, the physical structure of human beings gives rise to experiences in the first place.
It violates an animal’s basic rights, and experiments conducted on them result in extreme and even torturous pain. Every year, tens of millions of animals are used in laboratory settings to gauge the toxicity of newly developed chemicals. Researchers subject rodent to burns, electric shocks, or painful experiences, in order to examine how similar traumas could affect humans.
Examine the moral rightness of animal experimentation Introduction Animal experimentation has garnered increasing public and politic concerns recently, as the presence of it is becoming global and diversified. Although the argument of ethics in animal experimentation can be dated back to the Greek days, it will bring significant meanings to discuss the topic today as technology is advancing and the use of animal in scientific experimentations is more intensive than ever. Before proceeding, it would be necessary to properly define animal experimentation. Certainly in the context here, it excludes the mere observation of animals.
Singer accuses humanity of thinking this way if animals’ rights are not given fair representation. Non-human animals can suffer, that is, we all have the same interest in living: Singer comes to this conclusion by rationalizing that all other species are sentient and can suffer, suffering is bad, therefore, non-human animals should be included in daily-decisions for a utilitarian. Sentience is defined as the capacity to feel meaning they can feel suffering. For instance, when humans adopt pets and keep them in their homes we treat them as members of the household respecting them as equals: The pets return love and appreciation. In an alternative case, if the owner suddenly became aggressive and harmed the pet putting its safety at risk, the animal would naturally defend itself against the hostility.
”The question is not, can they reason? nor, can they talk? but, can they suffer?” Many people mostly who are with animal testing assume that animals could not feel pain, so they do not suffer when experiments are performed on them. However, animals have central nervous systems just like humans which make them feel multiple variations of emotions such as fear, sadness, and pain.
What is animal cruelty? Why should someone care about how animals are treated? Why is animal abuse a major concern? How are animals abused? These questions are frequently asked, and many people do not know the answer to them.
If animals had voices we could hear them shouting for help and agonizing from despair . Some of our day to day routines are one of the main causes that result in injuring many animals either directly or indirectly. Although people might not intend to hurt them, it is done due to lack of knowledge or lack of what called “the truth ” .Animal Cruelty is one of the many uprising problems which result in large amounts of species extinction either by getting shot for entertainment ,practicing hobbies such as fishing or wearing their skin as luxury jackets and shoes or throwing waste from companies ,sailing ships or human waste in water poisoned marine and inhaling chemical polluted air that are not suitable for them according to Marian
Most of the animals used in research are killed in experiments. The animals lives are sacrificed for bad research every day. In conclusion, animals are being put through pain just to die; some of the scientists don’t even know what they are testing the animals
Science researches believe that products which have been tested on animals will make humans’ life better. However, the main concern on this issue is that animals are suffering from unnecessary pain. Animals are mostly exposed to radiation, forced to inhale poisonous gases and injected with harmful substances prior to the experiment. Thus, animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, the result is unreliable and expensive.