ipl-logo

What Are The Long Term Effects Of Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

1057 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Negitive impact of the atomic bomb

[8:12 PM, 6/6/2023] Daniel ~: The decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II remains one of the most controversial events in modern history. While some argue that the bombings were necessary to end the war and save lives, others believe that they were unnecessary and even immoral. In this essay, I will assess the options that Harry Truman and his advisors had for their plan against Japan and evaluate whether or not the use of atomic bombs was a good option.

Firstly, it is important to consider the context in which the decision to use atomic bombs was made. At the time, Japan was refusing to surrender, and the United States was facing the prospect of a long and costly invasion of the Japanese mainland. Truman and his advisors had several options for dealing with this situation, including continuing conventional bombing campaigns, launching a naval blockade of Japan, and …show more content…

Critics argue that the use of atomic bombs was unnecessary and that Japan was already on the verge of surrendering before the bombings took place.

In my opinion, the decision to use atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not a good option. While it is true that the bombings may have saved lives in the short term by ending the war quickly, the long-term consequences of using atomic weapons have been devastating. The bombings ushered in an era of nuclear weapons and arms races, and they have had a lasting impact on international relations and global security.

Furthermore, it is difficult to justify the use of atomic bombs on civilian populations, especially given the fact that Japan was already on the verge of surrendering. While it is true that war is a brutal and messy business, the use of atomic bombs represents a new level of inhumanity and disregard for human

Show More
Related
642 Words | 3 Pages

But he had no compelling reason to do so. The bomb provided a promising way to bring about a prompt Japanese surrender without the disadvantages of other alternatives, and in Truman’s mind, its use did not require a lengthy consideration” (Walker pg. 96). After the bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, people decided that the bombs were actually required. The people thought that if the bombs weren’t dropped, thousands of American lives would have died while America invaded Japan. The problem with this logic is that many people died in those bombings.

Read More
1394 Words | 6 Pages

Name: Course Instructor: Class: Date: Critical Book Review: Prompt and Utter Destruction Introduction Within weeks, word on the US dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki began to spread that the main reason behind the bombs was to save the lives of Americans (Bernard). It was put that hundreds of thousands of American military causalities were saved through the bombings.

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

Since the bomb was used it showed the world the mass destruction that can be caused so it could help prevent larger destruction. Document three was written by the secretary of war and states, “The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki put an end to the Japanese war” which stopped the rest of the violence between the armies (Doc 3). Death is a part of all wars but the choice of the bomb also stopped further casualties because it stopped fire raids, strangling, blockades, and the overall clash between the two sides. These two quotes demonstrate why the atomic bomb should have been dropped on purpose because the purpose of these quotes was to put an end to the war. The next agreement is that some citizens believed that the bomb should not have been dropped and other measures should have been taken to end the war.

Read More
1249 Words | 5 Pages

He presents evidence of the devastation inflicted by the bombs and makes the argument that the United States could have pursued alternative options, such as a naval blockade, to force Japan to submit rather than using the bombs. The major objective of this paragraph is to present evidence in support of the contention that the bombing was not warranted. The support that is supplied comes in the form of an appeal to ethics, as O'Reilly argues against the use of atomic weapons using a moral justification in his

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

Looking at the statistics and charts during the war, the Unites States was already winning the war and the body count and death rate was way lower than the japanese where. If the U.S army stuck to the Island hopping campaign or operation downfall than the war would've still been won by the U.S. History would've turned out way different if the president did not give the order to fire the bomb. Maybe we could of had more allies. President Truman was not justified because of the way that he didn’t really have a plan,There were so many other operations and plans that could've works only if they tried or thought more clearly.(option #1: Invade Japan (operation downfall) President truman could have took many different paths instead of dropping the bomb and ending the war and frightening the Russians.

Read More
735 Words | 3 Pages

The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki devastated the people of these cities. This, however, ended the conflict between the U.S. and Japan, but was it a good idea for the U.S.? Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed, and over one-hundred fifty thousand people were killed in the atomic bombings of Japan. The bombings by the United States were necessary because Japan was a powerful adversary that the United States needed to overcome in order to defeat Germany. They had started World War Two and put the Jewish people and gypsies and people they deemed not good enough for society in concentration camps.

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the first and only time an atomic bomb was used. The bomb killed thousands of innocent Japanese civilians, and left few survivors. The Allies thought of using the bomb because it would instantly end the war, and it did, but at the cost of many innocent lives. The bomb was also used as a factor to demonstrate the power of the US, and was supposed to help push other countries out of several countries. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unnecessary because it gave little benefit to the Allies and led to thousands of innocent lives lost.

Read More
985 Words | 4 Pages

The Potsdam Ultimatum was also rejected by the conceited Japanese government officials because they didn’t want to have to surrender. Truman made the ultimate decision to save U.S. lives over the Japanese. The final supportive piece of evidence was that we had the necessary technology. Our Boeing B-29 fighter planes helped to drop the 5 ton atomic bombs, and evidently ended the war. To sum it up, the Japanese needed to be stopped, and from their past actions, the U.S. knew that they weren’t going to surrender on their own power.

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

In an attempt to get Japan to surrender to the Allies, in August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the nation. The first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and the second on Nagasaki. Although these bombs did contribute to Japan’s surrender and the end of the war, the use of this atomic weapon was an irrational and horrible decision. The United States should have abstained from using the two atomic bombs on Japan for the sake of civilian lives and possible alternatives to their decision. These bombs not only had detrimental effects on Japan, they also led to an arms race amongst several nations.

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

Japan was weakening, “The food situation gradually becoming worse and worse…” Stated in source H. America had many industrial resources to use against Japan and so Japan had essentially been defeated. Japan pushed only for the sake of their countries honour as the shame of unconditional surrender goes against their code of honour. Furthermore a warning was given to Japan with America promising to drop the atomic bomb, however there was no evidence and so it could have easily been deemed a bluff. An American nuclear scientist stated, “A demonstration of the bomb best be made… Japan could then be asked to surrender.” This source seems somewhat reliable as it is from one of the American scientists and they would know the strength of the bomb.

Read More
517 Words | 3 Pages

Moreover, as document 6 indicates through a letter from a soldier who fought in the Pacific, many believed that deploying the bomb saved countless American lives and facilitated an end to World War II. According to various arguments put up by supporters of the bombing, it can be inferred that the usage of atomic bombs was an essential and justified action. The belief is that Japan would have prolonged the war further, potentially costing many more lives. Additionally, the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki made Japan sorry for initiating conflict, and eventually led to

Read More
1479 Words | 6 Pages

Morally, Truman’s decision was correct, because he could either invade Japan and lose tens of thousands of American soldiers, or he could drop a bomb and kill tens of thousands of Japanese. While Truman did not want to in any way kill large numbers of people in Japan, he did not want American lives put in jeopardy. Truman wanted to end the war and have Japan surrender in a way that would not cause harm to thousands of people, but in the end, what he is going to care about most as President of the United States is the safety and security of his country, and the lives of its citizens over the enemy in

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

Since the Japanese were willing to inflict the most harm possible, the war may have lasted several more years. By 1945, those involved in the war were shattered. Therefore, the use of the atomic bombs was justified because it put an end to an already horrific

Read More
422 Words | 2 Pages

I feel that dropping the atomic bombs on Japan was absolutely not justified nor necessary. Japan was begging to surrender. It was unethical, immoral and inhuman to use such weapons, especially against innocent civilians. Truman was unwilling to accept anything except unconditional surrender. Why hadn 't Truman considered the Japanese 's one provision?

Read More
934 Words | 4 Pages

I think the United States should have not dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the atomic bombs was too expensive and it was not really worth it, they wiped out two entire cities, and Japan was planning on surrendering. The atomic bomb they used on Nagasaki cost 2 billion

Read More

More about What Are The Long Term Effects Of Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

Related Topics

Open Document