[8:12 PM, 6/6/2023] Daniel ~: The decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II remains one of the most controversial events in modern history. While some argue that the bombings were necessary to end the war and save lives, others believe that they were unnecessary and even immoral. In this essay, I will assess the options that Harry Truman and his advisors had for their plan against Japan and evaluate whether or not the use of atomic bombs was a good option.
Firstly, it is important to consider the context in which the decision to use atomic bombs was made. At the time, Japan was refusing to surrender, and the United States was facing the prospect of a long and costly invasion of the Japanese mainland. Truman and his advisors had several options for dealing with this situation, including continuing conventional bombing campaigns, launching a naval blockade of Japan, and
…show more content…
Critics argue that the use of atomic bombs was unnecessary and that Japan was already on the verge of surrendering before the bombings took place.
In my opinion, the decision to use atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not a good option. While it is true that the bombings may have saved lives in the short term by ending the war quickly, the long-term consequences of using atomic weapons have been devastating. The bombings ushered in an era of nuclear weapons and arms races, and they have had a lasting impact on international relations and global security.
Furthermore, it is difficult to justify the use of atomic bombs on civilian populations, especially given the fact that Japan was already on the verge of surrendering. While it is true that war is a brutal and messy business, the use of atomic bombs represents a new level of inhumanity and disregard for human