What Are The Similarities Between Lincoln And Julius Caesar

1054 Words5 Pages

Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln are unquestionably two of the great men that made significant history via their exemplary leadership expeditions in their respective countries. In comparing the two, one of the remarkable similar aspect of the history that came up between them was their assassination. Caesar is recalled as one of the history strongest general and an exemplary leader of the great roman republic. Many referred him as a demagogue and a dictator due to his act of abuse of power and disregard of the Roman laws that existed (Griffin, 2009).. He led his army in multiple battles against their enemies in 15 years during the civil war. Lincoln, on the other hand, is reminisced and celebrated as the greatest man in the history of America. …show more content…

Abraham impacted the history of America progressively due to his vigorous struggle in abolishing slavery as well as keeping the union of civil war together. During his time, slavery among other inequality atrocities were critical issues in the United States. However, Lincoln established a revolution that was oriented in accomplishing equality and through his vision, he was able to bring the county to embrace the spirit of impartiality among distinct racial groups (Burlingame, 2013). Caesar was an effective leader his action successively managed to transform the Roman republic into an admirable and respected Roman empire during his rule. As a leader, he initiated political alliances that assisted him to rise to power which enabled him to fight against inequalities by repossessing illegally acquired wealth from the rich to poor people. Although the two men did crucial work in revitalizing the society, Caesar was an authoritarian and made all decisions by himself without consulting people, while Lincoln is recalled as a president who accommodated different views and opinions from different parties for steering the country to …show more content…

Despite having all the power and influent he would have hoped for, he was still not comfortable and felt like he deserved more. To acquire more influence, he led his army declaring strong affirmative on states that were perpetrating atrocities slavery to black people. Unlike Caesar, Lincoln embraced the idea of politics when he joined a Whig of the legislature and created a platform with his opponents to debate important issues that were facing American at the time. While Caesar endorsed the slave trade, Lincoln was against slavery as he regarded it unfair and racial oppression. In fact, in 1962, he initiated emancipation proclamation, which allowed all victims of slavery in part of southern America to be freed which the southern resisted with worries of losing the slaves. Like Caesar, Lincoln started developing enemies’ for his prospected change. The southern was against the abolishment of slavery and on the contrary, embraced the retrogressive slave trade as they would be forced to work for themselves. As a consequence, Lincoln was plotted to be murdered by the people that were against positive changes which ironically was meant transform their