What Are The Two Compromises Of The Constitution
The state representatives often failed to see the big picture, and think with the nation’s best interests first and foremost. Fortunately compromise was found and Roger Sherman brought together the Connecticut Compromise, which focused on settling the large and small state dispute. Only after three fifths and trade compromises could be agreed upon over the major arguments was the constitution made a viable option, and then
During the early years of America, agricultural demands drove most of the economy allowing the South to demanded political protection. One of the protective measures was the Three-Fifths Compromise in 1787. The South wanted to count the slaves toward its population allowing for more representation. At the Constitutional Convention, the delegates decided to count a slave as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of determining the population for how many seats each State would have in the House. This solidified Southern control over Politics for several years to come.
The 3/5ths compromise The smaller states wanted more representation in the house but the north argued that if blacks weren 't allowed to vote and didn 't have rights they shouldn 't be counted towards house seats. The compromise stated that every slave counted as 3/5ths of a person towards house
How two big arguments turned into big agreements. A Compromise is when two people or states can't agree on something because they both want something different. The two compromises that came out of the constitutional convention are the Great Compromise and the ⅗ Compromise. The Great Compromise was an agreement between the larger states and the smaller states about their representation. The first plan was the Virginia plan which had the senate and the House of Representatives and this made it where it was based on the people which meant if the people in a certain amount from each state voted on something then it would be passed and in the states, this plan favored the larger states because of their larger populations.
At the Constitutional Convention, our founding fathers met to reconstruct the Articles of Confederation, not knowing that they would create the United States Constitution, an entire new format of government. They wanted to create a government that was powerful yet restricted in certain ways, in order to create equal representation for all people. Three main compromises were made at the Constitutional Convention. These compromises were The Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise, and the addition of the Bill of Rights.
“The accumulation of all powers..in the same hands, whether of one or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, 1788) ( Background Essay) This quote explains the reasoning for one of the framers, (B) Separation of Powers. The framers of the constitution were created to prevent tyranny and create a stronger government that would hold the nation together. Tyranny ultimately means harsh, absolute power in the hands of one individual-- like a king or dictator. The constitution guarded against tyranny in 4 ways: (A)Federalism, (B)Separation of Powers, (C)Checks & Balances, and (D)Small State-Large State.
On 1787, a constitutional convention was held in Philadelphia state house, where three proposal were suggested: the Virginia Plan, the New Jersey Plan, and the Connecticut Compromise. The Virginia Plan intention was to establish a Congress with numerical representation and a more robust national government; however, this proposition led into an opposed proposal called The New Jersey plan. The New Jersey plan was made to make modification to the Articles of Confederation but more importantly, the plan is to make clear of whom has the power of what states. Two delegates from Connecticut were joined together to acquire the image only by the states in senate and numbers in the House, calling it the Connecticut Compromise. As all the Plans I previously mentioned, I will go on depth on how the Virginia Plan, the New Jersey Plan, and the Connecticut Compromise shape America today.
The Articles of Confederation was an agreement among the thirteen original states of the United States that served as the first constitution. The Articles had first been introduced by Richard Henry Lee in the Second Continental Congress. Although the Articles of Confederation has made its contributions throughout history, the Articles, however, did not last very long and had been proven inadequate from the very start. I agree with this statement based on the examples and analysis of the Constitution I will soon provide. The Articles of Confederation were written during a time when the American people feared a strong national government.
After the countless debates, the Great Compromise was what the convention would come into agreement with representation by population in the House of Representatives “The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand, but each state shall have at least one Representative. ”(add footnote) The smaller states were pleased with equal representation in the Senate “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senates from each state and each Senator shall have one vote.”(add
The Constitutional Convention is where the Great Compromise is being settled. What is the Great Compromise? The Great Compromise is an agreement that large and small states reached
The issue the compromise was about was whether there should be slavery in the western territories. Maine wanted to be added to the Union, however, slavery was banned there. If Maine were to be added to the Union, it would upset the balance between free and slave states in the nation and the Senate. So, the Missouri Compromise, proposed by Senator Henry Clay, allowed Maine to enter the Union as a free state, and allowed Missouri to be entered into the Union as a slave state.
One of the compromises made in the Constitutional Convention is the three-fifths compromise. In this compromise, the southerners wanted to add slaves to the population of the state they lived in. If slaves were included in their state’s population, that state would be able to add more representatives in the House of Representatives. Northerners did not agree with that statement because slaves did not have the right to vote. After the delegates compromised, they agreed that only three-fifths of the slave’s population would be counted into the state’s population.
From the articles of 55 to 66, they explained the structure of the outcome that came from the Connecticut Compromise, the House of Representatives and the Senate(Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, 1788 Federalist Paper). It further discussed the election methods, terms of re-election, and their duties. In this section of the articles, the Federalist Papers was mainly add on more details and restrictions onto the conclusion that draw from the Connecticut Compromise, with the legislative structure of the House of Representative and the Senate. The New Jersey Plan along with the Virginia Plan made out the Connecticut Compromise, which had perfected the US Constitution with justice and rights to
This compromise helped give each state equal say in the government. As John Samples said to the Cato Institute in In Defense of the Electoral College, “ … the Electoral College makes sure that the states count in presidential elections… an important part of our federalist system - a system worth preserving… federalism is central to our grand constitutional effort to restrain power.” (Doc C). Since this nation is founded on federalism (the sharing of power between national and state governments), it only makes sense that each individual state would want equal say in the nation’s government. Samples knew that to keep the government running smoothly, each state needed equal representation in the government, thus the Electoral College.
This helped guard against tyranny because when this compromise happened, both big and small states had equal representation in the Senate equally, (Both big and small states had 2 representatives). In the House, a bigger state will have more representatives. (Doc D). This helps guard against tyranny because since both big and small states have equal representation, none of the states can become tyrants.
More about What Are The Two Compromises Of The Constitution
The Summer Of 1787 By David O Stewart Sparknotes
1497 Words | 6 PagesThe Three-Fifths Compromise In 1787
267 Words | 2 PagesArgumentative Essay On The 3/5ths
49 Words | 1 PagesPros And Cons Of The Great Compromise
337 Words | 2 PagesExplain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention
705 Words | 3 PagesTyranny Dbq
463 Words | 2 PagesThe Virginia Compromise
575 Words | 3 PagesStrengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation
724 Words | 3 PagesEssay On The Great Compromise
298 Words | 2 PagesThe Constitutional Convention: What Is The Great Compromise?
254 Words | 2 PagesCompromises Between 1820 And 1860
1121 Words | 5 PagesThe Three Compromises Made In The Constitutional Convention
1593 Words | 7 PagesThe Great Compromise
760 Words | 4 PagesDbq Essay On The Electoral College
904 Words | 4 PagesConstitution Guard Against Tyranny Essay
487 Words | 2 Pages