ipl-logo

What Challenges And Difficulties Did The Tsarist Government Of Russia

1017 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Cause and effect of bolshevik revolution 1917

“ What challenges and/or difficulties did the tsarist government of russia face and why did the russian citizens want to end the Tsar's Autocratic government?” Is the question I will be discussing within this Argumentative Essay about the Russian revolution of the year 1917.
The Russian revolution was ongoing during the end of World War I and was the cause of one of the first countries that replaced its monarch state and began a Communist state. During the Russian revolution a rebellion under the name of Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin started to remove the Tsar Nicholas II out of power and to put an end to the tsar government. The tsar government on the other hand had been ruling over russia since the year 1505 and once the tsar Nicholas …show more content…

Tsar Nicholas II was seen as an incompetent and irresponsible leader who didn’t understand how to rule a country, this was often shown when he had to make any rash or important decisions. Nevertheless he still cared a lot about his family, which was one of the reasons for the tsar to have met the monk Grigori Rasputin. Rasputin was well known for his “ability” to both see into the future and heal all kinds of wounds. Due to the fact that Rasputin was healing Alexei, the heir to being the next tsar's hemophilia, he had become a divisive figure in the Russian court and it was not soon after that he had fallen in love with the Tsarina, the Tsar’s wife. After the Tsar had then gone to fight in the War, Rasputin managed to rule over Russia through the Tsarina, which later on contributed to the order and corruption of Romanov …show more content…

The main reason for the long awaited regime change was due to the hundreds of years of oppression of the lower classes of the Tsarist regime. For instance, an example of this was the fact that for centuries the tsar’s taxed the produce of peasant farmers to earn money to preserve his regime, and since the burden of all these taxes was so high multiple periodic riots were on the outbreak. To further this Argument another reason the citizens wanted to end the Tsar’s government was because of Tsar Nicholas II’s failures within the battle of World War I. Not only was the Tsar, Nicholas II incompetent to the extent he couldn’t manage to rule over his country effectively, he also made further poor decisions when it came to working within the government that slowly led to worsening relations with the government and increased deprivation for civilians and soldiers alike. This caused men to go off to wars with no ammunition, hardly any food, rags for clothes and if they were lucky somewhat intact shoes. Even though he made all these mistakes he refused to accept any redactions in the power he held. Then in July 1915 Nichols II decided to take personal command of the armed forces, even though he had

Show More
Related
1271 Words | 6 Pages

With no signs of the czar’s attempt to solve the complications, Russia banded together and filled the streets with strikes and riots. A revolution was peaking among the peasants. The uprising brought Nicholas ll no choice but to abdicate his throne. This was an opportunity

Read More
1224 Words | 5 Pages

During the 20th century, Russia was experiencing turmoil in war and the country was deeply affected with Tsar Nicholas’s wrong decisions and lack of experience in politics. After the 1917 revolution in Russia, Lenin became the ruler of Russia and the USSR and proved to be the best Russian ruler of the 20th century. Before then, Tsarism dominated and Nicholas II was in power until he foresaw many revolutions against his methods of ruling. He remained as the supreme ruler and did not take actions for reforms. However, after the 1917 revolution, which Lenin masterminded, the Tsar was overthrown and the Bolsheviks established a stable government which took control in Russia.

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

“The czar refused to listen to demands for political change and in October, a general strike occurred as workers in the railways, industry and the banks stopped working” (document 3) A strike occurred because the czar didn’t listen to political concerns. This shows how unpleasant people were with the government. This can lead to the overthrow of the Russian monarchy. In document 3 it states, “...when a peaceful demonstration of 200,00 men, women and children in front of the Winter Palace in St Petersburg calling for reform was ended by the police and troops guarding the palace” Many people were unhappy with the Russian government and the fact the police were involved suggests how the government was willing to use force to stop political

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout Russia’s history, there have been many rulers that tried to manage their country in different ways. Even though, all of these rulers had their own unique ways of ruling, all of them were seen as terrible by the people. This eventually led to a tipping point for the Russian citizens and the Russian Revolution took place. The goal for these people was to gain freedom from their oppressive czar but instead, they got an even worse leader. Joseph Stalin was a leader of the Soviet Union from 1929 to 1953 and he was known for his ability to strike fear into people.

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

Based on how history people starving and Czar Nicholas 2 doing whatever he wanted was the main cause of the Russian Revolution. During this time people were being rationed for food because of the costly war effort. Along with the people going hungry Czar Nicholas 2 was constantly dissolving the Duma to get what he wanted. People started to lose faith in him due to government corruption and the way he was letting his people starve. People began to riot and the soldiers that were sent to end their rebellion defected to their cause and helped them to get rid of Czar Nicholas 2.

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

In the early 1900’s the Russian people had become angry at the way the Russian monarchy (Tsar Nicholas II) had handled foreign affairs and how he was treating his people unfairly. They had many protests, one in 1905 and two in 1917. The revolution in 1905 overthrow the absolute monarchy and put in a provisional government. No one really listened to the provisional government, so they overthrew it again in 1917. These revolutions and acts of disobedience led to many unnecessary deaths of innocent people.

Read More
600 Words | 3 Pages

They had harsh economic conditions and they were never satisfied with their farmland. Czar and his government were largely responsible for it . All of his citizens were controlled by the Czar, his rules he had in placed on everyone were not the best. Because of the rules, the Bolsheviks and their leader Vladimir Lenin decided to take action. What happened because of the revolution was the abdication of him.

Read More
4015 Words | 17 Pages

Early 20th century Russia was a hotbed for political discontent. The 1900s saw an increase in rebellion, riot, and opposition to the incompetent and unpopular Tsar Nicholas II (McCauley). New political parties, based on the theories of Marxism, began to gain power amongst the lower class workers and peasants (McCauley 17). By 1917, a series of unfavorable policies including Russia’s involvement in WWI led to the eventual crumbling of the Tsarist regime (McCauley). In February of 1917, the Tsar was forced to abdicate his position as head of the state, and a new provisional government, led by members of the former Duma, was set up in his place (McCauley 14).

Read More
149 Words | 1 Pages

Nicholas was neither trained nor likely to rule, which did not help the (absolute rule by a king or queen) he tried to preserve in a time in history (without hope/very upset) for change. The terrible result of the Russo-Japanese War led to the Russian Revolution of 1905, which the powerful ruler spread out only after signing a (public document that expresses a person's feelings) promising representative government and basic (guarantees to be treated respectfully as a valued human being) in Russia. However, Nicholas soon took back/withdrawn back in most of these givebacks, and the Bolsheviks and other (related to fighting authority or causing huge, important changes) groups won wide support. In 1914, Nicholas led his country into another expensive

Read More
544 Words | 3 Pages

The church would reinforce his authority and refer to him towards the people as the ‘Little Father’. The church was extremely influential in that era and ensured that peasants and working class, who were at the bottom of the classist system, were aware that challengers of the tsar were an insult to God. It was therefore hard to go against the Tsar, despite his rule being unfair to the poor. This leads on to Russia being hard to govern under tsarist rule due to autocracy. In his coronation speech in 1894, Tsar Nicholas said he will ‘uphold the principle of autocracy as firmly and unflinchingly as my late and unforgettable father’.

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

The conflict led to extreme amounts of casualties, a severe food shortage throughout the nation, and increased inflation. These effects of the war ultimately led to the army turning against the tsar, the public's dissatisfaction with the quality of life in Russia and widespread suffering would ultimately lead to rebellion. This uprising would eventually lead to the Tsar abdicating power and would be known as the February revolution. This revolution would create a provisional government. The new government was weak and with a large and a growing support base the Bolsheviks began taking positions in the government.

Read More
1514 Words | 7 Pages

What began with a revolution to overthrow the Tsar turned into a tug-of-war within the revolutionist and

Read More
1009 Words | 5 Pages

The tsar only cared about his power and not his people so much so he would sacrifice his own people to a war that if he thought about it more they could not win. An example of Tsar Nicholas ll being irresponsible and unprepared is in Ben Hartnell, 2011. Dr. Hartnell’s Education Revolution image that shows the reader the amount of deaths in ww1. Russia had the most casualties than any other country, being a total of 1,700,000 dead with another 5 million or so wounded, the war ended in 1918 when vladimir lenin pulled them out. This evidence furthermore expands the idea that the people revolting was good as Tsar Nicholas ll would still have stayed in that war if it weren't for the revolution that led vladimir Lenin in power it took them out of the war.

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

The Russian Revolution, which was started by Lenin and his followers, was a rebellion that occurred in 1917 which forced higher powers to act to the needs of the lower class. For instance, many citizens were worried for their protection in consequence to the lack of survival necessities due to an early drought. Furthermore, their current czar during the time was incapable for his position as a czar and made horrendous decisions as czar. For example, when the czar, Nicholas, entered in World War I, he sent untrained troops into countless battles of failure which costed in mass amounts of lost life (paragraph 23).

Read More
1308 Words | 6 Pages

By doing this, they overthrown the poorly run government as the Russian people were in favour of a new system that would work in their favour. The Russian Revolution was triggered by the social, political and economic problems, that combined caused the Russian people to rebel. This Revolution was triggered by the poverty of the Russian people, the loss from the wars, the sneakiness of Rasputin and the failure of the Tsar, Nicholas II. The social causes of the Russian Revolution arose from centuries of oppression towards the lower classes.

Read More

More about What Challenges And Difficulties Did The Tsarist Government Of Russia

Related Topics

Open Document