ipl-logo

What Criminal Charge Is Dave Most Likely To Face?

1006 Words5 Pages

PART (A) What criminal charge is Dave most likely to face? Discuss any defenses. Embezzlement The fraudulent conversion of the property of another by one who is already in lawful possession of it. Embezzlement requires proof that the defendant converted property of another, in his lawful possession with intent to defraud. Dave asked Pete if he could borrow his car to take his wife to the doctor and Pete lets him. Dave can’t afford to pay his doctors bill so he forges the pink slip for the car and gives it all to the doctor in lieu of payment. Dave was in lawful possession of Dave’s car(property) when he gave it away to the doctor (converted) without Pete’s knowledge or permission (defraud). Therefore, Dave committed embezzlement. Intent to …show more content…

John was drunk when he was fired and may claim that he believed he was entitled to the property taken because he was not given the severance paid owed to him at the time he was fired. However, claim of right cannot not be used in this case because John’s behavior is illegal even if Pete allowed him to take the car, as driving under the influence is against the law and John was so drunk that he fell asleep in the car. Therefore, this defense will not work. PART (C) What criminal charge is Sam most likely to face? Discuss any defenses. Larceny Larceny is primarily an infringement of another’s possessory interest in property. The elements of the offense are a trespassory taking and carrying away of personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of possession of property. Sam broke into Pete’s Chrysler(property), hotwires it, drives it away (taking and carrying it away) and trades it with a drug dealer for bags of heroine (deprive the owner of possession of property). Therefore, Sam has committed larceny. PART (D) What criminal charge is Ed most likely to face? Discuss any

Show More
Related
1242 Words | 5 Pages

The officer initiated a traffic stop and observed there were three men in the vehicle. The men were identified as the driver Partlow, and the passengers Pringle, and Smith. The officer asked Partlow for his license and registration. When Partlow opened his glove compartment to get his vehicle registration, the officer observed a large roll of money inside the compartment. He ran Partlow’s information for any wants or warrants and he came back negative for both.

Read More
409 Words | 2 Pages

The criminal charge arose out of various irregular financial dealings that occurred while Peterson was employed as

Read More
90 Words | 1 Pages

P alleges excessive force and false arrest. P alleges that she was in her kitchen when MOS broke her front door and entered the apartment and pushed her against the wall. P alleges that MOS handcuffed her and Noel Tartlaon, Noel Tartlaon, Jr. and Farrow Wright (non-parties). Defendant MOS Jose Peinan states that MOS were executing a search warrant obtain after confidential informant bought drugs form Jumaane, (non-party). MOS Peinan states that Jumane was arrested in the lobby and narcotics were recovered from him.

Read More
184 Words | 1 Pages

The employees were sanctioned for the underlying charges and the charge of giving the false statements. Holding of the Court: The court ruled in favor of La Chance because agencies

Read More
1369 Words | 6 Pages

She reported the jacket belonged to her. She further stated the jacket was valued over $250.00, and she didn’t give the defendant permission to take her personal item. Defendant’s Statement: Aronte’ reported he was walking to his home and a friend inside of a vehicle called out his name. He further alleged his friend asked him if he wanted a ride to his home. He also said upon entering the car, he observed another male in the car whom he did not know.

Read More
1080 Words | 5 Pages

Facts: Jose Colegio filled up his gas tank at a gas station and took off without making payment. Issue: Florida vs. Colegio (Will robbery be an appropriate charge?) Rule(s): Florida statues under title XLVI 812.13 Robbery - (1) “Robbery” means the taking of money or other property which may be the subject of larceny from the person or custody of another, with intent to either permanently or temporarily deprive the person or the owner of the money or other property, when in the course of the taking there is the use of force, violence, assault, or putting in fear. 812.014 Theft. — (1) 

Read More
194 Words | 1 Pages

Therefore, the following items were subject to forfeiture or seizure in violation of

Read More
671 Words | 3 Pages

The police officer found a large amount of money and what appeared to be cocaine in several small bags. Pringle, informed the officer that the money and bags of the substance was his. Pringle, took ownership of the contents found in the vehicle. Pringle, was arrested and charged with the intent to distribute illegal drugs. At trial, Pringle petitioned the court to have his confession be overturn, because he believed that probable cause did not exist for the traffic stop conducted by the police.

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

The issue is whether the state has enough information to charge Mr. Gregg with retail theft in excess of 150 dollars beyond a reasonable doubt. A defendant can be charged with retail theft if the three elements discussed in People v. Hill 2014 IL APP (2d) 121099-U are met “a person commits the offense of retail theft when he or she knowingly: takes possession of, carries away, transfers, or causes to be carried away or transferred, any merchandise displayed, held, stored, or offered for sale in a retail merchandise establishment with the intention of depriving the merchant permanently of the possession, use, use or benefit of such merchandise without paying the full retail value of such merchandise”. When the three elements of retail theft

Read More
476 Words | 2 Pages

As explained by Chief Justice Rehnquist the passenger compartment of the car was a small, confined area, adequate to assume knowledge if not a mutual understand of the presence of drugs within the vehicle. Accordingly, individual probable cause existed to support Pringle’s arrest by the police, and his confession was admissible, and his conviction should

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

The case of the State v Rusk involved the defendant Edward Rusk being convicted of 2nd degree rape. There was controversy as to if the defendant actually committed the act of rape due to the circumstances. The case involves a female named Pat. She decides to meet up one night with her friend Terry and go bar hopping.

Read More
682 Words | 3 Pages

In this case, grand theft wasn’t an inherently dangerous felony because Phillips technically didn’t do the crime of taking someone’s property against their will, he basically used the money to provide treatment/medication to Linda. Dangerous crimes according to the inherently dangerous felony / abstract approach is crimes that involved robbery, burglary, kidnapping, arson, rape, and etc. However, he didn’t do any of the above besides, “Repeatedly assuring Linda’s parents that he can cure her without surgery, and providing the care/treatment she needed.” In consequences, he should have been charged with felony murder, because he thought he could cure Linda, and although he was a doctor, he wasn’t the doctor that could have saved Linda’s life. She needed surgery, and eventually because he was held responsible for her care during that time period, the consequences of the crime backfired, because Linda died.

Read More
1006 Words | 5 Pages

Whether the Defendant, Mr. Jones and Cut-Rate Liquor, knew or ought to have known that the customer, Mr. Watkins, was intoxicated? According to the evidence obtained in Direct Examination, Mr. Jones maintains that he did not know and he could not have ought to have known that Mr. Watkins was intoxicated. In fact, Mr. Jones states with a certainty that “At no time on that date did I sell liquor to someone who appeared drunk. That is against the company policy, and I can be fired for doing so.”

Read More
74 Words | 1 Pages

One “thinking error” that Patrick committed during his criminal career was his laziness. He did not want to flight constantly from San Diego to Oklahoma especially in the winter. He decided instead to give his business partner an ATM card where she will be able to take money out. However, he did not take into account that there are cameras that are recording her making multiple withdraws to an account that is not hers.

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

In the scenario of Karl and Bob, they are both wrong in their actions. Their problem started when they decided to flee town in order to run away from their problems. As a result, Karl and Bob’s situation became more severe because Karl decided to steal a thousand dollars from a store and Bob decided to cheat an old retired man into giving him a thousand dollars. Karl’s actions may seem worse in the eyes of society and the law; however, when considering the morality of the situation, I am convinced that Bob was worst in his actions to cheat the elderly retired man.

Read More

More about What Criminal Charge Is Dave Most Likely To Face?

Open Document