Aristotle and his book Ethics was imprecise since the majority of what was written was very situational. Happiness is the “ultimate” goal and humans strive their entire life to attain that “temporary” feeling as aristotle believes that it is not permanent. Ethical behaviour as he has described is done by making virtuous choices and “living virtuously”. Some unethical behaviour doesn't make you an unethical person by his definition. You voluntarily make a disposition to be virtuous and if you have to make decisions non voluntarily that doesn't make you a non virtuous person either. When under voluntary action you can be held accountable for your actions whether they are virtuous or vice but in situations where you are not rational you cannot be held liable. …show more content…
According to Aristotle you also cannot truly have a judged life until death, meaning that you can’t be judged as to have a happy or virtuous life until death where all your actions can be observed. Since virtue is a mean between excess and deficiency, it varies from person to person, so there is no easy way to completely identify what is vice or how to stay away from it. You make decisions that will make you happy (going on with the means to end). Working to obtain money is generally considered as virtuous but if you obtain money in a vice manner to use it for a virtuous manner does that make you a vice person, not according to Aristotle. So unethical behavior can be had to achieve ethical goals that achieve your intrinsic goals of lifetime