ipl-logo

What Does Thrasymachus Say About The Nature Of Justice

970 Words4 Pages

In book I of Plato’s Republic, Socrates and Thrasymachus discuss the nature of justice. After Socrates deconstructs Polemarchus’s notion of justice, Thrasymachus eagerly interjects, posing a startling claim that initially perplexed me. Nonetheless, through class discussion and my own analysis, I ultimately gained a deeper understanding of Thrasymachus’s insights.
Once Socrates and Polemarchus abandon Polemarchus’s definition of justice, Thrasymachus inserts himself into their conversation. After insulting Socrates for neglecting to reveal his own views on the topic, Thrasymachus supplies a new definition, confidently asserting that “justice is nothing other than what is advantageous for the stronger” (15). Upon reading Thrasymachus’s claim, …show more content…

While evaluating Thrasymachus’s argument in class, I realized that his ideas are founded on the premise that there must be a sense of meaning and purpose behind the laws implemented by ruling bodies. As part of our class discussion, we reviewed Clitophon’s interjection to Thrasymachus’s argument, which accounts for the inherent fallibility of rulers. He declares that Thrasymachus intended to say that “what is advantageous for the stronger is what the stronger believes to be advantageous for him” (17). This addition would clarify Thrasymachus’s definition by accounting for rulers’ natural liability to err. Yet, Thrasymachus rejects this modification to his argument, implying that it is irrational to assume that an individual is stronger in his moment of error. From here, Thrasymachus proceeds to explain that his definition alludes to the most precise definition of a ruler, meaning that “a ruler, to the extent that he is a ruler, never makes errors and unerringly declares what is best for himself” (17-18). According to our class discussion, Thrasymachus’s ideas are grounded in the assumption that a true ruler possesses relevant expertise. While a ruler in title only is prone to mistakes, a ruler with the appropriate expertise can perfectly serve his own advantage. Through this lens, all laws implemented by a true ruler are purposeful and beneficial to the ruler. The notion that laws must be rooted in reason and purpose made Thrasymachus’s argument more appealing to

Show More
Related

Thrasymachus Positions In Plato's Republic

436 Words | 2 Pages

In Plato’s Republic, Thrasymachus presented several arguments in favor of the position that “Might makes right.” Presenting his first argument, he stated “Listen, then. I say justice is nothing other than what is advantageous for the stronger.” By the stronger, he meant the people who establish the rules in the country. Thrasymachus explained that any type of government, as it could be democracy or tyranny, has its own rules and the person who doesn’t obey to those rules will be considered unjust and therefore punished.

Read More

Socrates Argue Of Justice In Plato's Republic

342 Words | 2 Pages

the Republic, Socrates argues that justice ought to be valued both for its own sake and for the sake of its consequences (358a1–3). His interlocutors Glaucon and Adeimantus have reported a number of arguments to the effect that the value of justice lies purely in the rewards and reputation that are the usual consequence of being seen to be just, and have asked Socrates to say what justice is and to show that justice is always intrinsically better than is acting contrary to justice when doing so would win you more non-moral goods. Glaucon presents these arguments as renewing Thrasymachus’ Book 1 position that justice is “another’s good” (358b–c, cf. 343c), which Thrasymachus had associated with the claim that the rulers in any constitution frame

Read More

Arguments On Thrasymachus 'Lear In Socrates'

1029 Words | 5 Pages

As seen, he 's still standing on his point of view regardless of his approval to Socrates 's argument. He just continues to give examples to support his view without any real purpose behind that. He opposes Socrates 's argument saying the injustice makes a good life and, moreover, craftsmen are actually interested in their selves and not their subject. Thrasymachus declares that shepherds fatten their sheep for own interest in mind, not the sheep (343b).

Read More

Thrasymachus Definition Of Justice In Plato's The Republic

2106 Words | 9 Pages

In the Republic, Plato confers with other philosophers about the true definition of justice. Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus relay their theories on justice to Plato, when he inquires as to what justice is. Cephalus believes only speaking the truth and paying one’s debts is the correct definition of justice (The Republic, Book I). However, Plato refutes this with an example of a friend who has lost his wits and would be caused harm by repayment of a debt. This leads to Polemarchus’ view on justice, doing harm to one’s enemies and helping one’s friends.

Read More

According To Thrasymachus Proposed Statement That Cities Are Unjust

1371 Words | 6 Pages

Thrasymachus’s proposed statement that cities are unjust because the stronger rule the weaker to the advantage of the stronger is false because he, in fact, is arguing the opposite: it is just for the stronger to rule the weaker to the advantage of the stronger(Plato). My first argument for why the above statement is false is Thrasymachus’s claim that justice is the advantage of the established rule. This claim supports my reasoning for why the statement is false because an established rule requires strength; therefore, the advantage of the established rule is in fact the advantage of the stronger. An established rule does not come from the weak, as the weak are unable to impose their will upon the strong, which further enhances the idea that

Read More

Views On Thrasymachus's Argument In Socrates '

215 Words | 1 Pages

From Thrasymachus point of view I don’t see how he could believe that it’s the right thing to commit injustice whenever given the chance. By saying that Thrasymachus is basically saying that justice is to the advantage of rulers and injustice is to the advantage to the subjects. This is something I do not agree

Read More

Argument Of Justice In Plato's Book 1 Of The Republic

732 Words | 3 Pages

In Book 1 of the republic, by Plato, we are introduced to two central figures in the argument of justice, Socrates and Thrasymachus. Thrasymachus claims that justice is the advantage of the stronger. Socrates then asks if his understanding, that what is beneficial to the stronger is just and must be beneficial to the weaker people, to which Thrasymachus replies that no, this is not so. He explains that justice is that which obtains the advantage of the stronger.

Read More

Analysis Of Thrasymachus View Of The Nature Of Justice

1190 Words | 5 Pages

The US government is set up so that there are checks and balances so as to attempt to decrease the likelihood that someone would gain the power to take over the country. For instance, there are three parts in government to perform these checks and balances: executive, legislative, and judicial. Whether the US government succeeds at stopping justice that is “the advantage of the stronger” or not is beyond the scope of this paper, but how the US government is set up shows that they wanted to attempt to protect the country from becoming what Thrasymachus described justice as.(383c). Therefore, in reality there are cities or governments that make laws for their own advantage, but that does not mean that is how it ought to be. When Thrasymachus is describing how to get away with suffering from injustice he only takes into account human form of punishment.

Read More

Comparing Thucydides And Aristotle's Negotiation Of Democracy

634 Words | 3 Pages

However, power resides within the citizen for both Thucydides and Aristotle. The overwhelming majority of decisions in Thucydides are taken collectively (Pope, 1988). On the other hand, for Aristotle, the citizens must partake in political interactions as a way to fulfill their duty as a citizen (Politics by Aristotle, 2011). They share the view that the power of the ruler emanates from his constituencies. Such is true in the democratic sense, the citizenry elects who they think are the most commendable for the position.

Read More

Socrates And Crito Argumentative Analysis

1382 Words | 6 Pages

Socrates believes that justice benefits the just, but also benefits the city (other people) too. He is faced with a seemingly simple choice, escape Athens or remain in prison and be sentenced to death. Socrates’ central argument against escaping his circumstances is twofold. First, Socrates argues that “one must never do wrong.” (49b)

Read More

Socrates Definitions Of Justice In Plato's The Republic

1169 Words | 5 Pages

Socrates say’s this cannot be true because most of the people in this world make mistakes in judging who the real friends are and who the enemies are. Thrasymachus’s impression of justice is that the stronger person decides what justice is. Thrasymachus definition of justice raises two questions which needed clarification. First question is what exactly

Read More

Thrasymachus Ideas Of Justice In Plato's The Republic

763 Words | 4 Pages

In Plato’s The Republic” written in 380 BC, Plato introduces two characters Polemarchus and Thrasymachus who hold two separate opinions on Justice. They both are made to give their own opinions on Justice by Socrates. Both standpoints accurately represent Justice in sirtain situations. The word justice can be represented in many ways because it holds a broad meaning. They are covering two completely different aspects of Justice.

Read More

Thrasymachus Definition Of Justice Analysis

1470 Words | 6 Pages

In effect, Thrasymachus tries to invalidate the entire notion that justice should be a guiding moral principle: a strict or universal definition within these terms is not only unnecessary but also factually incorrect. This view presents an pessimistic position on the nature of humanity, and seems to suggest that there are no intrinsically good ways to live one’s life or structure a society. One could characterize these beliefs as a kind of nihilism. The idea of justice, from this point of view, is purely used under pragmatic

Read More

The Role Of Polemarchus 'Justice In Socrates'

770 Words | 4 Pages

When it comes to justice, Polemarchus believes that justice is “…helping friends and harming enemies.”. Socrates questions this point of view because according to Polemarchus’ view point, only the people who are close to him and in his circle of friends would be worthy of any kind of Justice. Polemarchus is wrong in this viewpoint because if only the people that you know who are of your similar social status and you interact with on a day to day basis are considered friends, what of those that you do not know? Or what of those who are not of your social status, that you do not interact with? Socrates questions this by asking, “Do you mean by friends those who seem to be good to an individual, or those who are, even if they don't seem to be, and similar with enemies?”.

Read More

Plato Socrates Social Justice

1467 Words | 6 Pages

In Plato’s Republic, Socrates and his peers attempt to define justice. Unlike the definitions that his peers give, Socrates is searching to define justice as a structure, not a set of behaviors. Socrates uses a tripartite city-soul analogy to define justice and show that it is found when there is harmony between the three parts of the city—guardians, auxiliaries, producers—mirrored to the three parts of the soul—reason, spirit, appetite. Although Socrates provides a well-structured account of justice in an attempt to demonstrate that there cannot be social justice—in the city—if people don’t first bring internal justice—in the soul—in themselves, he has a notable contradiction in his premises. In Socrates’ ideal city it is a necessary condition of an auxiliary acting in a just way that he must cause any producers who get out of hand, or

Read More

More about What Does Thrasymachus Say About The Nature Of Justice

Related Topics

Open Document