ipl-logo

What Happened At The Philadelphia Convention Speech Questions

450 Words2 Pages

SIMULATED CONGRESSIONAL HEARING

SPEECH QUESTIONS

Unit Three - What happened at the Philadelphia Convention?

1. Because of different economic systems, Northern and Southern states had different interests. These conflicting interests led to disagreements at the Philadelphia Convention.
• Describe at least two disagreements between Northern and Southern states at the Convention.
• What parts of the Constitution are the result of compromises that settled the disagreements between the Northern and Southern states?
• Do you think the Framers should have made these compromises? Why or why not?

2. Article II of the Constitution lists the powers of the President of the United States.
• Describe some of the powers the Constitution gives to …show more content…

➢ To what extent do you agree with the Anti-Federalists' views? Why?
➢ Do you believe that American history since 1787 has justified the Anti-Federalists' fears? Why or why not?

SIMULATED CONGRESSIONAL HEARING

SPEECH QUESTIONS

Unit Four - How was the Constitution used to establish our government?

1. One of the enduring contributions of the Framers to government was the creation of the federal system.
• What is a federal system of government? Compare it with a unitary or a confederation system of government.
• How are powers distributed between the states and the national government under our federal system? Give examples.
• What are the advantages and disadvantages of the federal system? Give some current examples.

2. Judicial review is an important part of our constitutional system of government.
• How did the Supreme Court acquire the power of judicial review?
• Do you think the Supreme Court should have the power to declare an act of Congress unconstitutional? Why or why not?
• How does judicial review protect the rights of the minority?

3. Political parties are an important part of our political system today. Yet they are not mentioned in the

Show More
Related

Sectionalism In Both The North And South Dbq

262 Words | 2 Pages

Sectionalism was a leading contributor to America’s inability to reach compromise. The North and South possessed passionate political views that differed immensely. Both the Northern and Southern states felt unheard and unconsidered. The reannexation of Texas proved to be pivotal in how close America came to going to fill out war then. Northerners were willing to take Texas as she was, sought not to change the character of her institutions and realized that slavery existed in Texas.

Read More

To What Extent Was The Northwest Ordinance Of 1787

995 Words | 4 Pages

Laszlo 12 of the respective states. So this is one factor that cannot be changed. The issue of slavery would still become a problem for both the North and South. Then, what about the decisions and accords made with regard to slavery and either its extension or prohibition in specific states? We mentioned the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which basically created a fair play situation by diving the states equally, 11 states each.

Read More

How Did John Marshall Dominate The Supreme Court

484 Words | 2 Pages

The Constitution grants to Congress implied powers for implementing the Constitution's express powers, in order to create a functional national government

Read More

Alexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution

1511 Words | 7 Pages

Lectures Lecture 14 “Questions to Consider #1”: Why did the Anti Federalists object so strongly to the Preamble to the Constitution? The Anti-Federalists objected so strongly to Preamble to the Constitution due to the fact the Preamble establishes powers for the three branches of government, states’ relations, mode of amendment, debts, national supremacy, oath of office, and amendment ratification. This group felts as though when the federalists wanting to create a strong central government would not be strong enough if the Preamble was not put into place. Lecture 14 states, “Anti-federalists suspicious of central power fought the new Constitution tenaciously…..

Read More

Difference Between Dual And Cooperative Federalism

230 Words | 1 Pages

When political sciences look at federalism there is two main models the dual and cooperative. Dual is the theory about the proper relationship between the states and the national government. It is has four major parts the first is that the national government only rules by enumerated powers. Number two is that the national government has a limited amount of constitutional purposes. Third both government national, and state is sovereign within its sphere.

Read More

How Did The Articles Of Confederation Guard Against Tyranny

837 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution guards against tyranny by using multiple Constitutional devices such as the separation of powers, checks and balances, federalism and bicameralism. The importance of this study is to show the success of the Constitution and to show how the United States of America has used the Constitution, without much complication for over 230 years. The Constitution is used in protecting the state's rights and the rights of the citizens of those states. The benefit of the government in the United States is the active guard against tyranny that was introduced over 230 years ago. The Constitution of the United States of America in fact protects Americans rights and guards against

Read More

How Did The Articles Of Confederation Influence The Constitution

1018 Words | 5 Pages

The Northern states, smaller in comparison to the south, already did not have as much representation and political power as the southern states. Therefore, the compromise to them was unnecessary, and they felt they would have all the power and dominate in the polls and decisions. Considering the different views the two already had based on slavery, this alarmed the northern states. However, as time passed, the Three-Fifths Compromise would not provide the advantage the slave owning south had hoped. The Northern states grew more rapidly in terms of population and ended up being opposing political power to others.

Read More

Democratic Government Dbq

385 Words | 2 Pages

The United States has a democratic government, which means our citizens get to help choose how our country works. The Constitution is setup to include citizens in the law making and voting process and preventing the US from turning into a tryannical government. Three ways we do thi s is by using Federalism, Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances. Federalism is a system our country uses to make sure power doesn’t stay in one area (Doc A). This method gives specific responsibilities to Central Government and each state.

Read More

Role Of Federalism During Confederation

269 Words | 2 Pages

Maintain and raise a navy and army, in general, armed forces. Before Federalism, during the Confederation this process got difficult because of the absence of funds, it was a trouble to raise money to pay the expenses of the service of soldiers and other situations, but later it got easier because the power of raising taxes came into effect and made economic situation more practical. Establish a court system, with strategies and organization to improve political administration. Furthermore, this power strengthened the validity of the processes to exercise justice with objectivity and fairness. It had the power to make and modify laws in order to carry out its power.

Read More

The Three Compromises Made In The Constitutional Convention

1593 Words | 7 Pages

One of the compromises made in the Constitutional Convention is the three-fifths compromise. In this compromise, the southerners wanted to add slaves to the population of the state they lived in. If slaves were included in their state’s population, that state would be able to add more representatives in the House of Representatives. Northerners did not agree with that statement because slaves did not have the right to vote. After the delegates compromised, they agreed that only three-fifths of the slave’s population would be counted into the state’s population.

Read More

1. Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

574 Words | 3 Pages

2). Whereas The Anti-Federalists movement was led by Richard Henry Lee, George Mason, and Samuel Adams in which they strived to create a strong executive similar to a monarchy in which there were fewer limitations on popular participation. Then we had the Federalists, which consisted of Alexander Hamilton, James Madison,and John Jay. Together they created and strived for a set of beliefs that checks and balances could protect against abuse, ultimate protection of property rights, and stressed the weakness of articles; indicating that a strong government was needed to protect the nation and solve domestic

Read More

Why Did The American Civil War Was Inevitable?

707 Words | 3 Pages

However, these differences show that the North and South were actually two distinct countries held together by one constitution. The North felt that decisions regarding slavery and its legality were entrenched in the central government while the South felt that such decision belonged to the individual states. In the times preceding the war, both sides could not reach a compromise. Bonner mentions, “Because secession and war were permitted to come, warned Russel, "We are not entitled to lay the flattering unction to our souls that the Civil War was an inevitable conflict (Bonner, 195).” Hence, these differences could only be addressed through war.

Read More

Federal System: Framers Of The Constitution

315 Words | 2 Pages

-There is an argument that the Federal system was recommended to the framers of the Constitution and is still used today. The Federal system unites the states under one nation without diminishing their separate administrations, state legislatures, and local patriotisms. What is good for one group of people or a political body is not necessarily good for another. -The Federal system creates a large, new country.

Read More

Judicial Review Pros And Cons

741 Words | 3 Pages

Robert Isenhour Federal Government 110 10/10/17 Judicial Review Judicial Review had been obsolete until 1803 when the need for it arose in the case of Marbury vs. Madison, where it was then found to become a new component to the Judicial Branch. I am here to discuss why judicial review is and shall remain a doctrine commonly used in constitutional law. Judicial Review is the power for courts to review other government branches to determine the validity of its actions whether it be constitutional or unconstitutional. These ‘acts’ can be described as legislation passed by congress, presidential orders and actions, or all state and local governmental actions.

Read More

Informative Essay: The Power Of Congress

402 Words | 2 Pages

What can the power of Congress control? Does Congress have to much power over the people? Does Congress not have enough that they control or change? In this paper these are the points im going to be talking about. When you think of the government do you ever think about these things?

Read More

More about What Happened At The Philadelphia Convention Speech Questions

Related Topics

Open Document