ipl-logo

What Happens To The Dyad

1091 Words5 Pages

Norms are like the guidelines for how people should act in society. It facilitates collective action problems and helps society get along. Now, what would happen if two people have conflicting views of these norms? The two people, or the dyad, can either settle it on their own or install a third party to solve the problem. The third party adds to the dyad making it a Triad. Usually a judge will be the third party and he/she will continue on with the triadic dispute resolution (TDR). The third party has certain characteristics that help solidify and legitimize the process to ensure compliance from both parties. The process in which the judge is chosen also adds to legitimize his/her final decision. The key here is compliance. Starting from …show more content…

In order for the initial dyad to comply with the decision of the judge, both parties will need to believe that the judge is legitimate, trustworthy and unbiased. In order to achieve these qualities, judges undergo a selection process. This process works in way that it eventually weeds out the candidates that are not qualified for the position. If a candidate falters at any point the selection process than they will not succeed. “Obstacles to achieving the legal degree, obtaining the right experiences, or meeting the best political power brokers are all elements of judicial recruitment, as well as how the final selection is made” (Volcansek, 2007). As people witness the candidates make it through the selection process, they build legitimacy because of the fact that the candidates actually make it through process. People perceive the process as difficult, daunting and hard to complete, so it must be assumed that only the best come out on top and they should be treated as …show more content…

If the losing party does not comply with ruling, then the judge cannot efficiently resolve the dispute. Alec Sweet explains that “contractants must perceive that they are better off in a world with TDR than they are in a world without TDR” (Sweet, 2000). The third party is charged with taking the norms and applying it to the situation. In order to make sure that the conflict does not happen again the third party works off that norm to expand its meaning. This would be a judge interpreting what the law means and expanding on its meaning to prevent future conflict, while also undermining the norm itself. In order to make sure that it does not look as though the judge is making up the rules as he/she goes, he/she makes sure to base the new law on the previous one. If he/she does not make it retrospective in nature, than it will no longer seem legitimate and compliance is thrown out. The judge will make sure not to declare one person complete victor in order to ensure the losing party complies with the outcome. If the judge decided to go with one party over the other, he/she will be perceived as bias and no longer

Show More
Related

Murder Of Vanessa Pham By Julio Miguel Blanco-Garcia

1235 Words | 5 Pages

After listening to both sides present their case the judge will issue a ruling on the defendant’s

Read More

Barbara Perry Mythical Norm Examples

250 Words | 1 Pages

The mythical norm is usually defined as white, thin, male, young, heterosexual, Christian and financially secure. Understands the law as a site in which racism, sexism, homophobia, and other forms of inequality are produced within the law. People who believe they fall under a norm have the tendency to look down upon the others who suffer from differentiation. With this mythical norm, people involved with the law tend to have higher powers than others compared due to the fact that they fall into the mythical norm. This creates a sense of power for the people who qualify as the norm.

Read More

Summary Of Gerald Rosenberg's Book 'The Hollow Hope'

710 Words | 3 Pages

Alex Frost Values: Law & Society 9/23/2014 The Hollow Hope Introduction and Chapter 1 Gerald Rosenberg begins his book by posing the questions he will attempt to answer for the reader throughout the rest of the text: Under what conditions do courts produce political and social change? And how effective have the courts been in producing social change under such past decisions as Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board of Education? He then works to define some of the principles and view points 'currently' held about the US Supreme court system.

Read More

Analysis Of Murphy, Marshaling The Court By Khalil Franklin

941 Words | 4 Pages

Thesis: “that judges, if they act rationally, must weigh all the alternatives” [see page 641]. Discussion- analysis of strategies and tactics. Assumptions made by the author; (1) historical role of a free society, has been deeply embedded in the American judiciary, (2) the

Read More

Examples Of Australia Not Embed The Bill Of Rights

1090 Words | 5 Pages

In America, judges have become too politicised . The government in power for example could be republican. They might appoint a judge who aligns with their political view and policy, causing that judge to interpret the constitution in such a way that allows the government to get away with something or may change rulings on a right. An example of this polarisation is the famous Bush v Gore case in 2000. In this case, a recount of votes in counties in Florida had not been undertaken, as was required due to the low majority.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Judicial Selection Methods

462 Words | 2 Pages

When people think of a good judge they typically think of somebody who is fair, not bias and has some sort of experience. However, in today’s society, particularly in the United States, our judicial selection methods are not made to select judges on their ability to reason well and rule impartially (Carter and Burke, 6). On top of that, judges have no actual training before they become part of the judiciary. The only training they receive is in school when they are studying the law. Sometimes when they pursue an apprenticeship with a judge they also get a little bit more experience or insight into a judge’s job.

Read More

Similarities Between Texas And Federal Court System

458 Words | 2 Pages

Ordinarily, this can lead to differences in the types of judges appointed and their approach to

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Merit Selection

1339 Words | 6 Pages

The main draw to merit selection is the commissions, which “minimize political influence by eliminating the need for candidates to raise funds, advertise, and make campaign promises, all of which can compromise judicial independence” (AJS, 2010, p. 1). Unfortunately, the commissions are the main drawback as well because many people think it is easily politically influenced. New York is a good example to analyze which one of these ideals is true since it changed from partisan election to merit selection in its highest courts, the court of appeals (Becker and Reddick, 2003, p. 25). Remember, merit selection most commonly uses retention elections to retain judges in office, but something unique about New York’s system is they do not use retention elections, which have been shown to be politically influenced like partisan elections (Reid, 1999, p. 68 and 69), subject to change with public opinion (Canes-Wrone, Clark, and Park, 2010, p. 229) , and have a low turnover rate (Carbon and Berkson, 1980, Abstract), like most states with merit selection of some kind. Retention elections have the main purpose of trying

Read More

Brock Turner Case Study

465 Words | 2 Pages

A fair and unbiased court system is necessary for the legal system. The role of the court is to correct any injustice, not to compound it. When prejudice and corruption leak into the courts, what recourse do we have for eradicating them from society? Our judges must be stalwarts of integrity because the power to move our country forward or hold our country back often lies in their hands. Judge Persky had the power to bring justice to a victim, to help her and her family move forward.

Read More

Judge In The Crucible

693 Words | 3 Pages

Judges must possess these characteristics to be effective because they need to have the to make sure every person has a fair trial in the eyes of the law. Danforth was biased and all through Act 3 we can see that he is ineffective by not be law-abiding, far, or willing to listen to the

Read More

Litigation Process Paper

875 Words | 4 Pages

The plaintiff presents evidence to the judge with a bench trial or a jury. The defendant has an opportunity to present the defense side of the cakes. The plaintiff and defendant have the chance to share their cases then the judge or jury decides the final decision of the case. There can be money or orders that the defendant is required to perform by law. The next step in the Litigation

Read More

Essay On Jury Selection Process

575 Words | 3 Pages

The courts have failed to gain recognition and rejection of the practice of excluding blacks from the jury: First by the composition of the jury panels and second in the use of peremptory challenges to remove black people who reach the panels from which the jury pool is selected. The conclusion that race and racism, continue to be major influences in a jury selection process and in the outcome of juries seems beyond doubt, but Kennedy retains his commitment to anti-discrimination as the appropriate standard in jury selection as in all other aspects of the law enforcement process. Moreover, rejecting procedures that would ensure racial diversity in the jury pool is a complication because they are not focusing on what is more important which

Read More

Summary Of The Buffalo Creek Disaster By Gerald M. Stern

1521 Words | 7 Pages

Our legal system allows judges to make important decisions on their own, which is a huge responsibility, and if it falls into the wrong hands, there could be severe

Read More

The Three Main Levels Of The Federal Court System

605 Words | 3 Pages

First, “at the lowest level are the district courts, where federal cases are tried, witnesses testify, and evidence and arguments are presented” (Krutz and Waskiewicz). Next, if the losing party does not agree with the decision, then they can take it to the circuit courts or U.S. Courts of Appeals, where the case will be reviewed. Finally, if the losing party still does not get the ruling, they want they can appeal to the Supreme Court. However, out of the thousands of appeals the Supreme Court receives only about a hundred cases are heard per

Read More

Essay On Judicial Selection

801 Words | 4 Pages

Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

Read More

More about What Happens To The Dyad

Related Topics

Open Document