ipl-logo

What Is Machiavelli's Use Of Fear In Julius Caesar

1105 Words5 Pages

Ultimately, this means that a prince should look to be feared rather than loved, but at the same time refrain from being hated. For men are, “ungrateful, fickle, pretenders, and dissemblers, evaders of danger, eager for gain” meaning that man is more likely to break trust with a loved prince for their own gain (66). However, a feared, but unhated prince is one that few are willing to conspire against, as there is little opposition due to lack of hatred, and fear of punishment. Machiavelli cites the roman emperor Severus as one who successfully executes this balance, and use of fear to maintain security. Severus carefully used deception and ferocity to gain and maintain power in Rome, as he defeated one general, and deceived another. Severus is a prime example of cruelty well used, to establish himself as emperor and maintain control of both army and state. It is through example and evaluation that Machiavelli deems it necessary to strike the balance leaning towards fear to maintain order. To Machiavelli, war, cruelty, and fear are necessary due to the nature of mankind, thereby needed for the security of the state; therefore, we see his central theme that the ends justify the means. …show more content…

Machiavelli’s conclusion relies upon premises established by the assumptions of human nature. He believes that there are just three types of brains: the most superior, which can reason and understand for itself; another, which notices what others can reason and understand; and the useless, which can neither reason nor understand either. He seems to believe that most people fall to the third type, and are simpleminded. That people in themselves are either selfish in their ambition or just want the status quo. Therefore, he focuses on the prince and what the individual can accomplish. He desires the greatest of mind that is willing to do whatever is necessary to the prosperity of the

Show More
Related
243 Words | 1 Pages

Directional selection and disruptive selection are two of the three types of natural selection. Although both of them result in a population adapting to biotic and abiotic environments, they differ in many ways. Directional selection occurs when one extreme phenotype is favored over the other phenotypes, whereas disruptive selection occurs when two or more phenotypes are favored over the others. Another difference is that disruptive selection favors polymorphism and directional selection causes species to evolve over time and leads to the extinction of those lacking the phenotypes causing the distribution curve to shift.

Read More
1056 Words | 5 Pages

Then for Machiavelli he talks about how a prince should show no fear instead for him to show that he is the one with power. That a prince's people should fear him. Both authors go on to talk on how their people react based on the prince and princesse act. The authors then go on to explain how they should view and run their people. Both authors also reflect the fact that the way their people are going to act towards them is mainly based off of how they treat them.

Read More
1989 Words | 8 Pages

According to Machiavelli, “when the prince is with his armies and has a multitude of soldiers under his government, then it is above all necessary not to care about a name for cruelty because without this name he never holds his army united or disposed to any action" (Machiavelli 67). Machiavelli promotes rulers practicing cruelty because it inspires fear in a ruler. Essentially, This fear makes his subjects easier to control because they fear the retribution the ruler may bring down upon them for disobeying one of his laws or

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

Machiavelli argues the perfect prince will be both feared and loved by his people, and if unable to be both he will make himself feared and not hated. Machiavelli believes it is much safer to be feared than to be loved because people are less likely to offend and stand up against strong characters, also people are less concerned in offending a prince who has made himself loved. Accordingly, Machiavelli believes generosity is harmful to your reputation and the choice between being generous or stingy, merciful or cruel, honest or deceitful, should only be important if it aids the prince in political power. All in all, Machiavelli believes the ruler must be a great deceiver and do what is essential to uphold power over the

Read More
2270 Words | 10 Pages

But since it is impossible to have and exercise them all, because the conditions of human life simply do not allow it, a prince must be shrewd enough to avoid the public disgrace of those vices that would lose him his state” (p 43). Here, Machiavelli again portrays his view of human nature. He emphasizes that since it is impossible, due to human limitations, for one to have all the qualities which we think a ruler should have, one should simply focus on avoiding the bad qualities which will cause him to lose the support of the people. Both of these passages show that Machiavelli believes that most men are not good, and that even the best of man cannot have all the positive qualities which a good ruler should have. Thus, instead of spending time and energy on a quest to change human nature (a quest which does not have guaranteed success), Machiavelli suggest a more simple, direct, and pragmatic solution: A prince should not try to be good, instead he should be cruel when necessary in order to maintain authority, control and peace.

Read More
337 Words | 2 Pages

Machiavelli’s The Prince (2012) is often misunderstood as a sort of “manual” for tyrants, mostly due to his infamous “better to be loved than feared or feared than loved” quote (p. 59). This oft-cited but tenuously understood quotation seems to have secured its place in history as the go-to phrase when discussing cruel and dictatorial leadership. The “feared/loved” quote, however, was not written to condone or promote tyranny. According to Machiavelli (2012), a leader always should “wish to be both,” while recognizing and accepting the fact that it is “difficult to unite [love and fear] in one person” (p. 59).

Read More
981 Words | 4 Pages

The Prince, written by Machiavelli, is a candid outline of how he believes leaders gain and keep power. Machiavelli uses examples of past leaders to determine traits that are necessary to rule successfully. Leaders such as the King of Naples and the Duke of Milan lacked military power, made their subjects hate them, or did not know how to protect themselves from the elite, causing them to lose power. He says that these rulers should blame laziness, not luck, for their failures. By looking at these historical successes and failures, Machiavelli is able to develop his own thoughts on how politics and leaders should be in the future.

Read More
1196 Words | 5 Pages

Their behavior demonstrates the human nature that Machiavelli defined, for they acted in their own self interest rather than the good of the state, and these are the vices that Machiavelli warns leaders about. Vices as such present the debated question on whether it is better to be feared or loved, and Machiavelli believes being feared is far safer because of human nature. Machiavelli believes that being feared helps maintain political order, for example, he states “those who for the sake of too much mercy allow

Read More
981 Words | 4 Pages

Machiavelli demonstrates how fortune is obtained and the difficulty it is to maintain it, creating rational decisions and acting accordingly in the moment of war is what creates a glorious

Read More
469 Words | 2 Pages

Machiavelli states rulers should gain and maintain power by whatever means possible, even brutality and manipulation. Machiavelli also believed that commoners were only loyal to their leaders when their needs were met. He thought manipulation should be used to convince the commoners that their needs and interest were met. Overall, Machiavelli viewed the commoners as an essential source of power for leaders, felt they were somewhat challenging to control, and must be carefully governed to gain stability in the state and avoid insurrection (Machiavelli, 1532/2003).

Read More
2023 Words | 9 Pages

Machiavelli relies on his knowledge of history to conclude that Princes who abide by a standard moral code rarely succeed. He stands by his argument that the end justifies the means for the prince. For the prince, the means is whatever is in his best interests, not necessarily the interests of his people. Sometimes, a Prince must create his new standard of morality, and sometimes change it, to meet his new means and maintain power. He believed that morality is a fluid concept, changing as the interests and the challenges of the Prince evolve.

Read More
1519 Words | 7 Pages

Hence, he uses personal pronouns like “you” and “I” as well as phrases like “My reply is.” This makes it seem like The Prince becoming famous was neither Machiavelli’s first priority nor real purpose; he simply wanted to express his knowledge on the western government and gives advice on how to be a strong leader. Also, some of his words sound like he was in grief. For instance, the sentence that says “But as soon as you need help, they turn against you.” It could be that he was disappointed or was betrayed that he decided to put together The Prince.

Read More
1284 Words | 6 Pages

In Machiavelli’s book, The Prince, he maintains a harsh perspective on reality. His advice on how to maintain power leaves no room for compassion or generousity. While some may believe that these are qualities of a good person, Machiavelli believes these qualities lead to the downfall of rulers. He acknowledges that, in reality, it is impossible for someone to have qualities of a good person and simultaneously a good ruler. Machiavelli’s realistic outlook causes him to emphasize that it is better to maintain power through fear, rather than compassion.

Read More
1652 Words | 7 Pages

According to him, rulers should know their respective limits when it comes to the force and violence they inflict. Machiavelli believes that maximizing betrayal, deception and other cruel acts aren’t considered talents. Although these methods are effective in gaining empire, these don’t help in getting glory. Therefore, using violence and cruelty may be necessary but should have limits. The prince must know up to what extent his violence should be inflicted upon and he must do it all at once to avoid the hatred and resentment from his

Read More
1034 Words | 5 Pages

Machiavelli believed that men will follow a ruler as long as the ruler serves their interests, and a quick to turn against the ruler unless they fear great punishment. Machiavelli would say that it is best to be feared rather than loved as long as the fear does not cause hate, which he believed to be perfectly possible.

Read More

More about What Is Machiavelli's Use Of Fear In Julius Caesar

Related Topics

Open Document