ipl-logo

What Is Samuel Johnson's Rebellion Against The Boston Tea Act

546 Words3 Pages

Immaturity In 1773, a group of men, known as the Sons of Liberty, rebelled against the Tea Act, which put a tax on tea. As a form of rebellion, the Sons of Liberty, threw 342 chests of tea into the Boston Harbor, destroying millions of dollars worth of tea. Samuel Johnson, an author at the time, was not pleased by the actions of the Sons of Liberty. Samuel Johnson was also an intelligent man, he studied at Oxford, but had to transfer because of financial issues. As a response to these men’s actions, Johnson stated, “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel”. When Samuel Johnson said, “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel”, he meant that it was wrong to commit a crime and then say one was not guilty because they were being patriotic, and he was absolutely right. This resulted in the actions during the Boston Tea Party being completely unjust. …show more content…

He believes their actions regarding the Boston Tea Party were unacceptable. There were plenty of other ways to rebel against the Tea Act. The Sons of Liberty were acting inappropriately during the Boston Tea Party. By, going through with the Boston Tea Party only made life for the colonists brutal. As a result of the the disobedience of the Sons of Liberty, the Coercive Act (also known as the Intolerable Act) was launched. Not only was this act enforced on Massachusetts, it was enforced on all of the 13 colonies. Colonists loathed the Coercive

Show More
Related
111 Words | 1 Pages

Raven, you are right. The British felt as if the colonies should accept the consequences for the colonists ' actions at the Boston Tea Party. As a form of punishment, the British passed the Intolerable Acts. The Intolerable Acts included the following: the Boston Port Act, which closed Boston 's port until the East India Company was repaid; the Massachusetts Government Act, which empowered the king to elect government officials in Massachusetts; the Administration of Justice Act, which allowed the government to move a colonist 's trial to another colony if a fair trial was unavailable in Massachusetts; and the Quartering Act, which permitted British troops to occupy vacant buildings when in the

Read More
142 Words | 1 Pages

They called themselves the Sons of Liberty. They borded three ships and dumped all the tea on bored into the harbor. Then, they marched through the streets of Boston. The colonists were punished. The British Parliament closed

Read More
836 Words | 4 Pages

The Boston Tea Party was a political protest by the Sons of Liberty in Boston, Massachusetts, on December 16, 1773. The Coercive Acts are names used to describe a series of laws relating to Britain's colonies in North America and passed by the British Parliament in 1774. Four of the acts were issued in direct response to the Boston Tea Party of December 1773. Patrick was part of a Son Of Liberty which was a organization that was created in the Thirteen American Colonies. The society was formed to protect the rights of the colonists and to fight taxation by the British

Read More
295 Words | 2 Pages

The Intolerable Acts were five laws that were passed by the British Parliament against the American Colonies in 1774. They were given the name "Intolerable Acts" by American Patriots who felt they simply could not "tolerate" such unfair laws. The British passed these acts as punishment for the Boston Tea Party. The Intolerable Acts (also called the Coercive Acts) were harsh laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774. They were meant to punish the American colonists for the Boston Tea Party and other protests.

Read More
338 Words | 2 Pages

They shouted, “No taxation without Representation!” The Boston Massacre and The Boston Tea Party angered the colonists and the king. This caused trouble between the Patriots and the British which led to the American Revolution. To start with, The Boston Massacre was just

Read More
216 Words | 1 Pages

The king punished Boston for their act of rebellion with Coercive Acts These acts closed the Boston Harbor and forced colonists to house redcoats and feed them. The colonists called these acts the “Intolerable Acts”. Colonists were astounded, but also enraged that the king had begun to

Read More
77 Words | 1 Pages

I like how you stated there were other ways the Americans could of got Britain to treat them better. The Sons of Liberty were willing to act in non-peaceful protest; however, when American’s made the colonists the constitution they made sure to only allow peaceful protest. Only allowing peaceful protests is essential, but I almost think it is a little hypocritical. Even though the Boston Tea Party fits under terrorism the colonist definitely got their point

Read More
1558 Words | 7 Pages

The American Boston tea party was probably the most unreasonable and destructive action taken by either of the two parties during this period, yet somehow historians portray this act as a sign of courage and independence. However, no matter how unreasonable the Americans were, they got the response they wanted from the British. The British responded to the Boston Tea Party with the “Coercive Acts” or the “Intolerable Acts” as some put it (“The Third Imperial Crisis”). This is where British reasonability exited the picture. The Intolerable Acts were four different acts that served as punishment rather than advancement of the British economy.

Read More
1274 Words | 6 Pages

Paragraph #10: The Boston Tea PartyThe Boston Tea Party is also another act of rebellion. The Tea Act is passed, makingBritish tea cheaper than colonial tea. The tea is not ideal and the colonists want different tea. They are ordered to purchase tea from the British East India tea company only.

Read More
1237 Words | 5 Pages

The Boston Tea Party: Destruction of Private Property or Justified Act of Defiance Nicolas Sweeney HIUS 221-B17: Survey of American History I February 2023 1 Was the Boston Tea Party a justified act against the British as a result of the tea tax, or was it an overreaction? The Boston Tea Party was an event that occurred on December 16, 1773, where American patriots went onto a ship that was carrying tea, and through all the tea into the water.

Read More
548 Words | 3 Pages

The Boston Massacre was an incident where British soldiers accidentally shot citizens while under attack. John Adams held a fair and just trial for the British soldiers. It wasn’t popular for him to do, but held to his beliefs that all men are entitled to a fair and just trial. Just one of the wrong actions of King George III was that he taxed the colonists without their consent. John made it his work to gain independence from Great Britain.

Read More
880 Words | 4 Pages

There were rebellions, pro-patriot groups, and a rising sense of colonial/national pride around this time period. With organizations such as The Sons of Liberty and the Daughters of Liberty helping the nonimportation agreement colonial uprising caught the attention of Britain. The British had known of certain riots and rebellious act, even some tamer forms of almost begging for a change, such as The Stamp Act Congress, Boston Tea Party, First Continental Congress, Second Continental Congress, and decided that they must be taught to obey their homeland’s government. Britain sent over some troops to take the weapons of colonial militia men yet the trained soldiers were met with an armed militia not ready to be taken as naïve

Read More
1005 Words | 5 Pages

This was an active representation of civil disobedience. The Sons of Liberty refused to follow these unjust laws and protested by dumping the tea into the harbor. The act of civil disobedience has three important parts to it in order for it to

Read More
672 Words | 3 Pages

Intolerable Acts The Intolerable Acts can be viewed as one of the first sparks to the flaming fire of America claiming Independence. The Intolerable Acts, also called the Coercive Acts, were a series of laws passed in 1774 in order to punish the colonies for defying their rule. Four out of five of the Intolerable Acts were directed towards Massachusetts directly and the other was directed at Quebec. All of the Acts were supposed to stop the colonies from defying England’s Rule and show the colonies that England was still in charge.

Read More
329 Words | 2 Pages

The Founding Fathers rebelled against the British government for good reasons, which led to the American Revolution in 1783. The Founding Fathers were justified in rebelling against the Britain because the government was not protecting the rights of the citizens, taxing the colonists, and forced them to house British soldiers. In 1756 Britain put the first tax on the colonists. This was the Stamp Act, it required colonists to pay taxes on certain items such as newspapers, legal documents, licenses, and even playing cards.

Read More

More about What Is Samuel Johnson's Rebellion Against The Boston Tea Act

Related Topics

Open Document