What Is The Federalist Paper No. 51 For A Strong Central Government

causes could not be removed7. Alexander Hamilton advocated in Federalist Paper No. 51 for a strong central government with a system of checks and balances; “several constituent parts may, by their mutual relations, be the means of keeping each other in their proper places”8. Hamilton and Madison specifically tried to prevent a revolution, like theirs toward Britain, from happening in America by proposing a strong democratic republic that could operate in concert with state governments and maintain a certain level of autonomy over the states and the nation as a whole. Federalist Papers No. 6-9 spoke to the importance of a strong union, as well as the discord a separation of states might have caused9. Federalist Paper No. 11 mentioned the

Hendrickson explained the Federalist central government claim as such, “It was a federal union rather than a consolidated government”10. In “Washington’s Farewell Address”, he spoke about the union of the states under a common government. He claimed,
“The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. ... The name of American, which belongs to you in your national capacity, must always exalt the just pride of patriotism more than any appellation derived from local

Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson believed that U.S. fortunes were linked to the ability of merchants to engage in international trade. However, they differed in their opinions of how much of a role international trade should play in American commerce. Jefferson’s policy encouraged a quasi-free-market trade system through which the United States could import and export goods freely with international partners. Even when Great Britain was imposing restrictions on U.S. ships and goods, Jefferson sought to remain trading partners through “friendly arrangements with the several nations with whom the restrictions exist…” or “by the separate act of our own legislature for countervailing their effects”12. Hamilton’s policy was conversely more protectionist. He wanted to impose greater duties and embargoes on foreign imports of goods that could also be produced in the United States. Hamilton strove for a largely domestic system of production through which the benefits of domestic manufacture would far outweigh the costs. By producing goods internally, which would otherwise have been imported, the U.S. economy would thrive because of increased domestic competition where the gains from productivity would benefit all domestic industry. The increase in domestic producers would result in the secondary effects of more jobs, providing more opportunities for merchants to export American goods