ipl-logo

What Is The Purpose Of Cicero's Speech On The Manilian Law?

3332 Words14 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Cicero's orations

Cicero’s de imperio Cn. Pompei, or “On the command of Gnaeus Pompeius,” clearly endorses the passing of the Manilian Law, which gave Pompey command of the war against Mithridates VI. However, the speech also serves other, less obvious purposes. In order to explore the reasons behind the speech, the question, “What is the purpose of Cicero’s speech on the Manilian Law?” was entered into ChatGPT. This is the answer it provided: ChatGPT’s answer, though noticeably flawed in some areas, correctly states the obvious purpose of this speech, which is that it endorses Pompey to lead the war against Mithridates, though it fails to mention the purpose of the speech in the context of Cicero’s political career. Moreover, it provides some correct information about the content of the speech, though it lacks depth and devotes too much attention to minor aspects of the speech, which subsequently leads to a failure in capturing Cicero’s true intentions while delivering the speech. Immediately, ChatGPT is incorrect in saying this speech was delivered to the Roman Senate. It was actually delivered to an assembly of the Roman people. Cicero begins his speech by saying, “Although I have always particularly enjoyed the sight of you thronging this place, and have always …show more content…

Cicero’s speech was also used as a tool in advancing his political career, especially in terms of his future consulship, a position that requires the good will of many people in Rome. It is crucial to understand that this law was certainly going to be passed, with or without Cicero’s support. Also, it is important to note that this was Cicero’s first public speech to the people, mentioned when he says this is his first time speaking on the rostra (de imperio Cn. Pompei 1), so this served to introduce himself to the popular realm of Rome at this time. With this knowledge, Cicero’s decision to give this speech goes beyond simply wanting Pompey to be

Show More
Related
469 Words | 2 Pages

Anthony starts off. His speech by directing his speech stating he was his friend to create and emotional bond with there crowds”My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, And I must pause till it come back to me. ”(Anthony,1664).Anthony gets the Roman’s to yearn for more information after he states”mention it within their wills, Bequeathing it as a rich legacy Unto their issue. ”(Anthony ,1680). He builds there trust with using ceased was selfless to provide for them he did this to push people all on there side.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

Izabella Figueroa Mrs. Linda Comm Honors English 10 12 April 2023 Antony’s preeminent strategy A rhetorical device, according to www.vocabulary.com, is “a use of language that is intended to have an effect on it’s audience.” In Antony’s persuasive speech to the citizens of Rome, from “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar,” Antony utilizes the rhetorical devices of logos, pathos, and ethos to argue that Caesar wasn’t really ambitious, and there was no need for him to be murdered by the conspirators. Doing so forces the audience to consider his claim and change their previous viewpoints.

Read More
678 Words | 3 Pages

Brutus and Antony’s speech really shows how important rhetoric is to present a good argument. During Act III, scene II of Julius Caesar, Rome is mourning the loss of Caesar after he is stabbed by the conspirators. Antony, Caesar’s best friend, joins the conspirators to seem like he is on their side. Antony’s final goal is to get revenge on them and start a civil war to avenge Caesar. He makes an agreement that he will not accuse or blame the conspirators in his speech at Caesar’s funeral.

Read More
792 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus begins his speech in Act III, scene ii, at Caesar's funeral, with an upset crowd questioning his motives for killing Caesar. The crowd’s initial reaction to Brutus is that he is honorable and venerated, but still needs to explain why Caesar was assassinated. Brutus tells the crowd that he did not kill Caesar because he didn’t care for him, but he killed Caesar because he loved Rome more. In addition, that if Caesar were still alive and king, all of the people would die slaves, and claims that he killed Caesar for the good of Rome. Brutus is able to persuade the crowd that he had honorable intentions for killing Caesar through the use of rhetoric-ethos, logos, and pathos.

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

By refusing to read the will several times and admitting that what it contains will cause the people to have such a great love for Caesar that knowing he is now dead will be unbearable, Antony ignites curiosity in the people and furthermore, a subconscious feeling of respect and graciousness toward Caesar. Basically, Antony uses Caesar’s will to convince the people that Caesar was a selfless, kind-hearted man and those who killed him should be ashamed and punished for killing an innocent man. Through Antony’s use of paralipsis, he is able to plant a seed of admiration for Caesar and one of hate for the conspirators in the hearts of the plebeians. In his speech to the citizens, Antony also asks many rhetorical questions to cause his audience to pause and reflect on how they really feel, or how Antony wants them to feel, about certain people and events that have recently become important. In one instance.

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

Logic through rhetorical devices helps convince the people that Caesar’s death was not warranted. Antony had “thrice presented [Caesar] a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse” (III.ii.92-93); this emphasizes the idea that Caesar was not ambitious or dangerous in any way through evidence. Another piece of evidence Antony mentions is the will of Caesar, in which “he gives, to every several man, seventy-five drachmas… all his walks, his private arbors and new-planted orchards, on this side of Tiber; he hath left them [the people], and to [their] heirs forever -- common pleasures” (III.ii.236-245). This once again is non-falsifiable evidence Caesar did love the Roman citizens, and he wanted the present and future Romans to live in

Read More
207 Words | 1 Pages

Mark Antony is trying to win over the people of Rome by his very effective use of rhetoric. In his speech, his overall point is to persuade the Roman citizens that Brutus’s claim of Caesar being ambitious is not true. Antony’s use of rhetorical devices such as a rhetorical question give the people a good message. When he is telling them that Caesar brought many captives to Rome, he asks, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious” (3.2.18). Antony’s rhetorical question was very effective since he is making the people question Brutus’s claim.

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

At the end of the speech, Antony has won the citizens over and they feel that what Brutus and Cassius did was wrong and they want

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar- Rhetorical Analysis In the novel, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, after Brutus brutally executes Caesar in Act 3 Scene 2, Antony is allowed to give a speech to the people of Rome whom have seen witnessed this fatal tragedy in Scene 3. Antony uses anaphora, connotative diction and details throughout his speech to persuade the Romans to change their perspective of Caesar and Brutus. The way Antony speaks about both Caesar & Brutus are a dispute of what he is actually trying to announce to the Romans. At the end of his speech, Antony hopes to reach the Romans emotionally (pathos) by enraging them against Brutus’s false statements against Caesar.

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

Antony’s Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, after Caesar’s death, the Romans are conflicted about what should be done. After Brutus’ speech the Romans are ready to crown Brutus king and be on the conspirators’ side. Though Brutus then leaves the crowd while Antony delivers his speech, the crowd realizes what should be done of Caesar’s murder and Antony prevents the conspirators from getting away with the murder of Caesar.

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar

Read More
632 Words | 3 Pages

Antony's skillful use of emotional appeal, rhetorical questions, and loaded language creates a powerful argument that sways the people of Rome to join him in avenging Caesar and his supporters for the heinous crimes committed against them by Brutus and his conspirators. Antony's skillful use of language is central to his success, as it allows him to manipulate public opinion and engender fervent support for his cause. This essay will examine how Antony uses these rhetorical devices to great effect, leading to the tragic end of Caesar's life and the further destabilization of Rome's political climate. In Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar, Antony's use of emotional appeal plays a key role in swaying the opinions of the Roman citizens against the

Read More
617 Words | 3 Pages

Marc Antony gives his speech at Caesar’s funeral to the citizens of Rome. The purpose of his speech is to prove to the citizens that Brutus is wrong and Caesar shouldn’t have been killed. The tone of his speech is very ironic. It also gets very dramatic as he talks about Caesar being killed.

Read More
922 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus 's speech: Brutus speaks to the people of rome why he killed caesar so they will not turn on him. He talked about how he didnt kill him because he didn 't love him but because it was for the better of rome. He also tells the people of rome that letting caesar become king would mean the government type would change and all the wars and hard work his family had put into the government would go away. He also states, for the welfare of rome that he would die for rome if rome demands his death Rhetorical devices: Brutus used questions, logos, parallelism, and pathos to stir the people of rhome. Question-

Read More
1177 Words | 5 Pages

There are two reasons why Antony gave this speech. The first was to get back at Brutus for murdering his beloved friend, and making him pay for it. The main reason Antony gave this speech is because he had a greed for power. He thought that if he could get all the plebeians on his side, that they would attack the conspirators and trust Antony, therefore making it easy to take on the spot for power. “Our course will seem too bloody, Caius Cassius, To cut the head off and then hack the limbs, Like wrath in death and envy afterwards, For Antony is but a limb of Caesar.

Read More

More about What Is The Purpose Of Cicero's Speech On The Manilian Law?

Related Topics

Open Document