What Is The Rhetorical Situation In 3 Ways To Speak English

The rhetorical situation in the text "3 Ways to Speak English" by Jamila Lyiscott identifies the language in a particular context. People talk differently depending on the context and the need to pass information. Thus, the rhetorical situation is that language should be spoken in a particular context. No one has to judge how people talk about a language, for no one is articulate in a specific language. Therefore, in this case, the author outlines three different ways a person can speak English and remain articulate by observing the context of the language use. Thus, the author's main argument from this text is that language should be used in various contexts since they determine how we choose our words or the diction applied. For instance,

For instance, the author argues that, at times, even American English differs at some point from British English. Not that they are not speaking the correct language, but it differs in meaning, which implies that no one can claim to be perfect or articulate in one language, particularly if it is widely shared, like English. Therefore, the author of this text highlights that people should use language to suit their needs. For instance, the language should be inclusive, even if it is broken English, as long as it meets the required meaning or purpose. Thus, it brings out that the primary function of language is communication, and the language was chosen to fit the context in which it has to be applied. In a school setting, the preferred language has to be formal and official to meet the required evaluation standards (Warren, 2017). However, when with friends, the traditional structure of using a language like English changes widely since some slang is incorporated into the language to suit the needs of the audience or the users. It is a similar aspect that the author examines in language use at home. Therefore, no one is wrong when using a specific language when it meets the desired purpose. Besides, the author reminds us that language abuse cannot be pinned down on the user since people have different cultures and have been forced to adapt to a particular

The author argues that language has a stronger connection with culture in this context. Historically, English has robbed man's native languages and significantly impacted their usage. It has become a determining factor through the culture in which the language is spoken. It is the driving force that the author highlights as affecting the use of English and why aspects like broken English are being realized in speaking English as a language. Besides, the author explores other rhetorical devices in the text, particularly rhyme. It has been widely used in the text to create rhythm and affirm the importance of using English in different contexts (Zulkipli & Ariffin, 2018). Rhyme has been used in this text to create a rhythm to differentiate users' ability to use English. It shows that other users can play with the English words to create a rhythm unique to other users, particularly those whose languages have been assimilated by English. It becomes essential that the speaker of a given language understands the context in which they try to proclaim the prowess of the given language and ensure that they live within the contingents of that