ipl-logo

What Is The Tone Of Address By Susan B Anthony

567 Words3 Pages

Being alienated to the point where being a citizen does not matter, especially since voting is a crime if you are a woman. In the short passages,” Address by Susan B. Anthony,” spoken by Susan Anthony and,” Freedom or Death,” spoken by Emmeline Pankhurst, the authors give a narrative of how poorly treated women are being treated at this time. In these confrontations, there is a level of effectiveness the authors want to create to mark the statement that women should have the ability to vote. In the first passage,” Address of Susan B. Anthony “the author in this passage appeals to emotion of anger through the harsh tone and demanding of answers of why she got penalized for a crime for something American citizens should be able to do. According to this speech the author states,” I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen's right, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any State to deny.” This evaluates the fact that Mrs. Anthony is mad for knowing that she had the ability to vote but was stopped because she is a woman even though she should be allowed to do these rights. Continuing forward, Mrs. Anthony also appeals credibility to the Declaration of Independence to …show more content…

In the conclusion of her speech it reads,” All men are created equal, and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights. Among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." It is determined

Show More
Related
390 Words | 2 Pages

To start off, in the first paragraph, Susan B Anthony introduces her topic. She speaks on the woman right to vote and explains she has been charged for the crime of voting. To support that voting as a woman should not be a crime, she uses the national constitution as evidence. “It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting, I not only

Read More
1066 Words | 5 Pages

In the beginning Susan B Anthony Dares to Vote, the story shows that she was brave, even though it was against the law, she still went and voted because she is a citizen of America and she thought she should have the right to vote. For example, “On November 1872, she and 15 other women in Rochester, New York, had demanded to be registered and had voted in the national election. Soon after, all 16 women were arrested”. In the middle of the story when she was in court, instead of saying nothing or saying sorry, she stood up for herself and told the male judge that she would never pay if they gave her a fine.

Read More
412 Words | 2 Pages

The third, and final, device Florence Kelley uses to build her argument is a shift in topic. Her speech is delivered to the National American Woman Suffrage Association, a group primarily concerned with the equality of voting laws. She vows to use her right to petition “in every possible way until the right to ballot is granted.” By referring to a common goal shared by the author and her audience, a sense of trust is established between the two parties.

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

The speeches of Susan B. Anthony and Franklin D. Roosevelt on women's right to vote were both powerful and influential in their own ways. While both speeches aimed to promote gender equality and secure women's right to vote, they differed in terms of rhetorical strategies and strength of arguments. In this essay, I argue that Susan B. Anthony's speech was stronger than that of Franklin D. Roosevelt, owing to its passionate rhetoric and logical arguments. Anthony's speech delivered in 1873 was a forceful and emotional appeal to the audience to recognize women's rights as equal citizens of the United States. She used powerful imagery to draw parallels between women's suffrage and the fight against slavery, arguing that denying women the right to vote was just as oppressive as slavery.

Read More
470 Words | 2 Pages

The rights that all citizens have were ensured by the constitution and therefore they cannot be denied by a law pass by the state. Anthony assured that a law that takes away women’s rights to vote because of their gender is a “violation to the supreme law of the land” (19). If their rights were to be revoke half of the country would become superior to the other causing the rights of liberty and equality to disappear. Denying the rights of a woman based on her gender makes the country less of a democracy and more of an aristocracy (Anthony 19). The country was built upon equality for all but if women were not included than equality would never be

Read More
2556 Words | 11 Pages

In Anna Howard Shaw 's speech to the suffragists and anti-suffragists of America, she is easily identifiable as a skilled orator and it makes sense that Susan B. Anthony sought her out. She easily handles the bias against anything she says as a woman by dissecting opposing arguments and pointing out their flaws. Her use of clean cut logic and ability to sway a crowd enabled her to create the persona of a man in the eyes of anti-suffragists. Through her speech at New York and its recanting at other locations in the U.S., her efforts and the efforts of others were not in vain when women gained the right to vote in 1920, five years after her speech. The main factors that contribute to this goal were her well thought out uses of ethos through emphasizing the most important or thought provoking point, and her establishing her credibility by proving her gender does not define her intelligence.

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

Convincing the crowd that voting rights for women are important and a right given by the United States of America is a tall task, but Susan finds facts and uses reasoning to accomplish it. Susan points out that voting is for all of the people, not half of the people, and proposes the idea that, “It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union. And we formed it, not to give the blessings of liberty, but to secure them; not to the half of ourselves and the half

Read More
1975 Words | 8 Pages

By using the countries’ own governmental document, Anthony masterfully poses, “In this very first paragraph of the declaration, is the assertion of the natural right of all to the ballot; for, how can “the consent of the governed” be given, if the right to vote be denied. Again: ‘That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundations on such principles’” (Anthony par. 4-5). Women are citizens of the United States who are governed, yet they have no say in their government.

Read More
1200 Words | 5 Pages

Anthony employs logos in her speech is by framing the issue in terms of fundamental democratic principles. She argues that the right to vote is a basic right of citizenship and that denying women this right is a violation of their rights as equal citizens. She emphasizes that women are taxed without representation, and therefore lack a voice in the political process. By using this logical argument, Susan B Anthony appeals to her audience's sense of justice and fairness and establishes a strong foundation for her argument. Susan B. Anthony also uses statistical evidence to support her argument for women's suffrage.

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

Therein, she expressed her ideas about women 's suffrage. She gave a talk to encourage American men and women to give political rights to women. In her speech, she states that both men and women are created equal and hence due to this equality women should have political rights too. Throughout her speech she emphasizes the discrimination against women, using the right to vote, the roles in marriage, and unequal wages as her evidence.

Read More
632 Words | 3 Pages

How they couldn’t vote and how they didn’t have the rights that white men had. But throughout the whole speech, she is trying to convince people to start a big ordeal on how white men are not the only ones able to vote. In conclusion, the author is speaking to her fellow women and the to the wrong white men of the United States. Her purpose of making this speech is that woman have just as much right to vote as white men do.

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

Upon first appearance Marie appears to be a dark, twisted temptress, but upon closer analysis Cather reveals to us she is truly a wild spirit. Cather presents Marie to us as a “white night-moth” who is “flutteringly” away into the night. Cather’s imagery presents Marie as a free spirit, because moths travel freely with no clear direction or motive. This paints Marie as an individual who moves without direction or intention, which displays the transcendental principle of living life on a whim. Marie is described as a “white” moth which represents purity and how she seems to be divergent from others around her.

Read More
686 Words | 3 Pages

Imagine being a woman during the times when you could not vote. This was the reality for both Susan B. Anthony and Emmeline Pankhurst. Anthony gave a speech entitled “Is it a Crime for a Citizen of the United States to Vote?” In this speech she attempts to make a claim that women should have the right to vote, through her use of logic and analogy to laws. Additionally, Pankhurst gave a speech in 1913 called “Freedom of Death” where she expressed her feelings and opinions about women’s right to vote with her use of repetition and metaphors.

Read More
1137 Words | 5 Pages

In her speech she continues to say, “And it is a downright mockery to talk to women of their enjoyment of the blessings of liberty while they are denied the use of the only means of securing them provided by this democratic-republic government -- the ballot.” (Anthony,1)

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

However, this is incorrect because the preamble says, “We the people”, and society should be thought of as a whole and should not be divided based on gender. In Anthony’s speech she says, “It is we the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we the male citizens; but we, the whole people, we formed the Union.” Anthony demonstrates how everyone is a person and the constitution clearly states that everyone should be equally treated, and people should not be discriminated based on gender or race. She explains how the citizens of the United States are supposed to be treated as a whole and are not supposed to be separated based on unnecessary factors. She uses logic and reasoning to get to the audience and tell them that constitution and preamble were written to help the country not divide it based on gender and race.

Read More

More about What Is The Tone Of Address By Susan B Anthony

Open Document