ipl-logo

What Is Timothy Tackett's Theory In When The King Took Flight

1102 Words5 Pages

On a late night in June of 1791, King Louis XVI and his family absconded out of Paris when the sky was black and full of horror. The King’s plan was to abort from the French Revolution and its brutality, as well as reunite with the foreign assistance to restore authority over France. Timothy Tackett supports his theory in When the King Took Flight by explaining how King Louis XVI predetermined his own future by the actions he took. When the royal family encountered the people of Varennes, the escaped plan was corrupted. This forced the king and his family to be restrained until the authorities arrived to escort them back to Paris.
Louis’ effort to escape “denounced the Revolution at every opportunity in secret messages.” The people of France …show more content…

Due to being very indecisive, his poor choices later catch up to him when he is recognized and discovered by Jean-Baptiste Sauce in Varennes. Once the king and the royal family return to Paris, the people felt the king was mislead by his counsel. A great number of people believed that their beloved king was kidnapped, until the letter was found in the palace. The people of France then began to change their opinions about the king. He went from being a misguided king to “simply Louis the False.” In the letter, King Louis XVI stated he did not believe in the oath he swore upon and left the people to starve. The oath that the deceitful king took was formed by the National Assembly that took over two years to come to an …show more content…

The political groups start to recruit many citizens, in fear of their nation’s future, to stand for a Republican government and eliminate the monarchy. The citizens that were very underprivileged and did not obtain the right to vote became engrossed in the political protests. The Cordeliers club offered an opportunity to the lower class men and women to join and become involved. When the first written constitution supported the young voices in the Assembly, this created a constitutional monarchy which granted the king power to veto and assign ministers. The leaders of the radicals Maximilien de Robespierre and Georges Danton became very furious with the agreement; in which they began to influence a more republican form of the government to the popular support. The Cordeliers club called for a trial against the king in hope for “the creation of a regency government.” The radicals began to question why a dishonest man that everyone hates is allowed to run the government. Robespierre came to a conclusion that the king needs to be criticised through a “regular court system” or “the calling of a national convention” to be able to stop the Revolution. The Jacobins was formed by previous members of the National Assembly, and they desired a strong government that could control war conflicts and economic turmoil. They wanted to mandate the “poorer citizens from

Show More
Related
658 Words | 3 Pages

With regard to the overall excerpt, does Duc de Saint-Simon’s portrayal of Louis XIV appear admirable, critical, balanced, or analytical? You may also choose your own description. Use some passages to build your support. According to Duc de Saint-Simon Louis XIV was a person with a great mind but was more focused on a small things like “…the dress and drill of his soldiers.”

Read More
323 Words | 2 Pages

Eight thousand protesters stormed the revolutionary Convention in 1793 to demand worth controls on bread and grain. The politicians gave in and introduced a series of laws referred to as the Maximums to regulate costs, however food shortages continuing and radicals saw them because the deliberate work of traitorous counter-revolutionaries. In 1793, the 2primary revolutionary political clubs were the Girondins and also the Jacobins. The Girondins were supporters of free market principles and rejected the concept of worth controls or different restrictions on business. disorder sans-culottes were unconcerned with ideas like economic system, particularly once they could not get enough food to

Read More
704 Words | 3 Pages

Louis Riel was born the 22th october 1844 and died the 16th november of 1885. Louis riel is a Traitor because he did fight for his people form the canadian government but he also did it with the metis he is the leader of the metis and the government was scared that louis riel and the metis would kill the canadian government but louis riel only wanted power, people think that he is a real hero but once the people start to reward him he will take advantage and he will have power and he will betray his people. He fought for them just to gain there trust. Louis riel was going into elections so he can be president, louis riel went into those elections because he wanted power just pretend he is a great person but he is gonna betray all of his people.

Read More
230 Words | 1 Pages

The French Revolution started in 1789 and was ended in the late 1790s. The Revolution was driven by the French people's desire to redesign their country's corrupt and unjust Government. This thinking was brought up by the new ideals that the Enlightenment had created. To achieve this new Government, the people of Paris formed a coup d'etat against King Louis the Sixteenth. During the coup King Louis was beheaded by the Guillotine, thus starting what is known as “The Reign of Terror”.

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

The Reign of Terror In September 1793 to July 1794, the Reign of Terror killed over 40,000 people in France using the guillotine a machine that made it a simple way to execute a mass amount of people. The Reign of Terror was led by no other than , Robespierre. He was trying to form a new government but instead caused thousands of people to be massacred. Ultimately, The Reign of Terror in France was not justified because the threats did not require it, the methods were too extreme and It did not support the ideals of the revolution.

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

In 1789, in response to the Tennis Court Oath, he signed the Constitution which expressly shared political authority with the National Assembly. In making this agreement, Louis clearly and publicly demonstrated that he understood and agreed that the authority of France was shared by its people (Brisbane Girls Grammar School Humanities Department, 2018). The defence will likely argue that Louis had come to believe in a political system where power was shared and where he was a monarch supported by the Constitution. The evidence available to us negates this argument.

Read More
455 Words | 2 Pages

Should certain actions be accepted by society when they are for the greater good? Often in situations there are two defined sides. The reign of terror posed challenges to the government to remain civil and fair. While there were people that brought violence and hardship to avoid any change in the nation. The actions that took place during the reign of terror are justified due to the fact that it brought france order and stability, established fair rights, and abolished inherited human circumstances like slavery and nobility.

Read More
987 Words | 4 Pages

Birthed from a multitude of causes including the execution of the king, the momentum and arbitrariness of the Revolution, and fear of counter-revolution, Terror itself, became synonymous with the Revolution. Questioning of the Terror thus was equivalent to questioning the Revolution- a crime which carried life sanctions. The Reign of Terror’s pervasive and tyrannic movement infiltrated the nation and claimed over 50,000 lives of conceived counter-revolutionaries, inclusive of Source B’s orator, Antoine Barnavare. Jean Paul-Marat’s emotive speech reinstates the New Order “crush us in the name of justice, they load us with irons in the name of liberty”, perpetuating the development of the Revolution from moral to tyrannical. With the guidance of both Source A and Source B, the first having addressed feudal and monarchical injustices’ committed against the people, and the second- the people's retaliation, to growing extremes, the development of the French Revolution can be traced efficaciously.

Read More
1001 Words | 5 Pages

The role that King Louis XIV plays in Tartuffe, although not a character himself, affects the whole outcome of the play. King Louis XIV was an absolute monarch and was responsible for restoring order in society. The age of reason, 1660-1805, was a time to restore order while finding humor in those who stray away from order. King Louis was responsible for ensuring the safety and order of the country, and we come to learn that his power spreads much further than suspected. By divine right and being an offstage presence, King Louis XIV has the ability to control and assist everyone, whether it is warranted or not.

Read More
764 Words | 4 Pages

Was The Reign Of Terror Justified? The French Revolution was a very problematic time period. After the execution of Louis XVI, the Reign of Terror began during the years of 1793 - 1794 which was led by French politician, Maximilien Robespierre and lasted for 18 months. This topic is controversial when the question, “Was the Reign of Terror justified?” is asked.

Read More
1088 Words | 5 Pages

The French Revolution was bound to happen. With the oppression of the lower class, a broke government and nobility questioning the government it was only a matter of time before the people fought back. Crane Brinton in The Anatomy of Revolution says that oppression and a broke government are just some of the reasons that the revolutions happen. Brinton argues that every revolution especially in the western hemisphere follows a pattern. He believes that the French revolution is clear example of that pattern.

Read More
272 Words | 2 Pages

The Jacobin Club was formed in 1789. The Jacobins were notorious for putting pressure on the legislative assembly through their many journals. This club’s main purpose was to limit the powers of the king. Throughout the Jacobin club’s life span, they grew more radical, adopted republican ideas, and advocated universal manhood suffrage, popular education, and separation of church and state.

Read More
1078 Words | 5 Pages

Was the French Revolution preventable? This is a question that is fascinating to think about. What could have been done differently to prevent this revolution that cost countless people their lives? Why were others willing to give their lives, for what cause? Why was life so turbulent?

Read More
1350 Words | 6 Pages

Arianna Paulin Mr. Bonnet World History II, French Revolution 27th of October, 2017 Through His Actions and Policies, To What Extent was King Louis the XVI Responsible for the French Revolution? Introduction Paragraph Between the years of 1785 and 1793, the French society was on the verge of collapsing. There was poverty and famine roaming the streets, making it nearly impossible to survive given the ridiculously high and unjust taxing system.

Read More
1151 Words | 5 Pages

This was a big step forward to fixing the rigid social structure of France and opposing the monarchy’s oppression of peasants. Additionally, Louis was convicted of crimes such as conspiring against liberty. He was later executed on January 21, 1793. (Scandiffio) This shows that the monarchy was seen as very detrimental to the ideal of liberty, the conviction and execution of the king marked the end of the monarchy which was formerly a vital feature of the Old Regime.

Read More

More about What Is Timothy Tackett's Theory In When The King Took Flight

Related Topics

Open Document