ipl-logo

What Role Do Leaders Play In Genocide Essay

799 Words4 Pages

What role do leaders play in genocide?
Discuss with reference to the Armenian Genocide. The United Nations defines genocide as an act “committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group” (Analysis Framework). A lot of deliberate thought and calculation goes into organizing genocide and leaders play a very important role in this process. However, leaders cannot create hatred; they can only take and manipulate what already exists and use it to their advantage. Over 3,000 years ago, the Armenians made their home in a region of Eurasia called Caucasus. While independent, Armenia became the first country to adopt Christianity as its official religion. This caused many problems for them …show more content…

The Turks were scared: scared that the Armenians would steal their jobs; scared that the Armenians would side with the Russians; scared that the Armenians would take over Turkey. This is where the leaders came in. Both leaders, the Sultan and the Young Turks, knew how to draw what they wanted out of people. Propaganda was used to depict the Armenians as second-class citizens, or lesser people. They were subjected to different laws and the consequences for breaking those laws were much more severe than those of the Turks. The Armenians were slowly stripped of everything they had: their goods, their property, their jobs and their leaders. They were left with nothing. The Armenians were no longer considered a people; they’d become a group of individuals not deemed worthy of life. The Turks eventually began to believe that the Armenians weren’t human beings at all. This, combined with fear of the consequences of disobeying authority, is what made the Armenian genocide possible. Using the divide between the Turks and the Armenians combined with the hatred and tension that already existed throughout the Ottoman Empire, the leaders manipulated the people into doing terrible things, things they might not have otherwise done. As evidenced by the Armenian genocide, it is not necessary to have one ruler throughout. There is no one “evil” tyrant. The capacity lies

Show More
Related
1293 Words | 6 Pages

“Who does now remember the Armenians (Adolf Hitler, 1939)?” Who does? When someone hears the word "Genocide", the words killing and death may come to mind. A genocide is defined as, Article II: “In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group as such:Killing members of the group;Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.”

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

A constant struggle for many is the lack of independence and oppression. The same could be said for Turkey before Mustafa’s help to get them their full independence. Mustafa fought for them in more ways than one, and led them after it was established. Turkey was originally owned by the Ottoman Turks, but was defeated by their national hero, and later president Mustafa. Turkey is full of rich culture and has many iconic structures located there.

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

Since they greatly opposed any separation in the first place they saw that the Greeks during this time as mischievous. In document 2, Mustapha III, a Turkish sultan, sees the Greeks as robbers and evildoers because they are destroying order and peace. This documents sheds light on how the Greeks were perceived as people just rousing up trouble and had no just cause into the things they were doing. For document 9, Valid Pasha, a Turkish governor believed that the Greeks were going around creating uncalled for trouble because they were defending Christianity which was never really threatened. In an overall sense the Turks viewed the Greeks as a destructive force towards

Read More
1624 Words | 7 Pages

In 1944, a Polish-Jewish lawyer came up with the word, “genocide.” However, even seventy-five years later, many people still debate what factors go into making a genocide. Of course, there is mass murder, mistreatment of large groups of people, and difficult life conditions. Take the Cambodian Genocide, for example. People were tortured and killed so much during this genocide that at one of the death camps, “as few as 12 managed to survive” (Pierpaoli).

Read More
514 Words | 3 Pages

The Armenian Genocide caused generations of pain and loss of the rich heritage of the Armenians. Not only did the genocide cause major human losses, but also caused a major psychological and moral blow at the attempt to exterminate the Armenian nation from the root. The Armenian Genocide resulted with around 1.5 million Armenians massacred, with only around half a million surviving the genocide. The loss of family, friends and the Armenian community, the genocide had a staggering blow on the Armenian race. The survivors escaped with merely their lives and the horrid memories of the cruel and inhumane nature of the Young Turks.

Read More
1136 Words | 5 Pages

The act of genocide carried out by a group’s oppressors characterizes itself in the intimate knowledge the oppressor has of the group’s social, cultural, and political institutions. Raphael Lemkin describes genocide as an act of anti-sociology where the perpetrator destroys a group’s societal institutions to destroy them in whole or in part. This destruction is described by Lemkin as an anti-sociology because of its targeting of all aspects of a group’s societal institutions: political, social, cultural, economic, biological, physical, religious, and moral. (Lemkin, Chapter IX: Section 2). Genocide destroys a group’s social, individual, political, and cultural connections as demonstrated by the Armenian and Native American genocides where

Read More
654 Words | 3 Pages

Rahul Mone Mrs. Marsden ELA Honors I 4 February, 2016 The Cambodian Genocide The genocides of Cambodia and the Holocaust were two major genocides that have changed the history of the world forever. The Cambodian genocide started when the Khmer Rouge attempted to nationalize and centralize the peasant farming society of Cambodia (Quinn 63).

Read More
299 Words | 2 Pages

This allowed the Ottomans to blend education and religion evenly. The decline of the Ottoman Empire was rough, Suleyman killed his best son which was probably the best fit for the throne. Suleyman exiled his second son, which meant his third and weakest son inherited the throne. His third son had no leadership skills to be able to keep the Ottoman Empire at it’s peak, and the Ottoman Empire went crashing down.

Read More
1008 Words | 5 Pages

During his era the Ottoman Empire experienced spectacular economic growth and that lead up to the golden age of the Ottoman empire(Sultan Suleyman the Magnificent. 1). This age was filled with knowledge and wisdom and the culture was mixed with different backgrounds of people and religion. Sultan Suleyman had a lot of nicknames and one of them is the lawmaker as Suleyman was the first sultan to create law and rules, before Suleyman other Sultans would follow the rules of the Holy Quran only, but Suleyman saw that creating new rules that are mixed with the sharia and it was called Kanun. During the golden age of the Ottoman Empire experienced new arts, different cultures and religions which shaped the empire in a way that it can interact with the people in a positive way by letting everyone live in peace and by their beliefs(Yalman, Suzan

Read More
456 Words | 2 Pages

Ideas can so easily become war because people do not like change or do not agree with the changes that are being made. When the Ottoman Empire split, new and grand ideas came from everywhere. Some of these thoughts went against what was

Read More
239 Words | 1 Pages

Each of these great Asian empires rulers had a diverse perspective on how they should govern their empire. Starting in the 13th century, The Ottoman empire became known for extending Islamic conquests and for conquering other great empires (Bulliet, 427). The first ruler of the Ottoman Empire was Osman, who was shrewd, but his subjects saw him as a providing justice for his raya and military forces to protect them. His government remained comparatively isolated form the lives of most subjects. Non-Muslim subjects were able to live their lives looking up to religious leaders in their communities.

Read More
1136 Words | 5 Pages

Some would suggest they were dysfunctional more than ever with so much power and not enough change in there government policies. In the 19th and 20th century decline of the Ottoman Empire started to appear and final establishments of borders after WWI. They lost their grip on Greece after it fought for independence in 1821, then Romania, Serbia, Bulgaria and Montenegro (Yakub 2151). The Great Powers -France and England- took over what today is the middle east. The Ottomans knew that going against those powers and having a Turkish war would terminate

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

The Armenian Genocide occurred during the First World War when the Ottoman Empire was experiences the pressures of war from the Triple Entente. In 1915, the ANZAC forces had landed in Gallipoli and the Russian forces were advancing down from the Caucasian fields. During this time, the Ottoman Empire displaced and forced millions of Christian minorities to march through the desert. Historically, it had been Muslims who victims of violence in the area. However, Christian minorities were in a vulnerable position due to the decline of the Ottoman Empire and impending revolutionary violence (Jones 155).

Read More
620 Words | 3 Pages

The Ottoman Empire came into power in 1301. The Ottomans were able to overthrow the Seljuks and after that they were able to repopulate the city and stay in power until 1922. The Ottoman rulers implemented many systems that were more helpful than harmful and allowed them to have strong loyal citizens. These systems built up their empire in crucial places. The Ottoman Empire had a strong trade and military system with religious tolerance these factors allowed them to stay in power for so long.

Read More
1075 Words | 5 Pages

One of the many reasons why the Ottoman culture became a well-organized empire was its social hierarchy system. The Ottoman social class had the commander on top (sultan) and the slaves on the bottom (rayyah) but however, a person’s social level could change anytime, unlike other caste systems in Japan or Britain where people stayed at the same level for the duration of their lives. The Sultan dealt with politics and state wealth. Under the Sultan were the wealthy leaders that defended the empire and ran the military and other offensive expansion

Read More

More about What Role Do Leaders Play In Genocide Essay

Related Topics

Open Document