ipl-logo

What Role Does Virtue Ethics Play In Kantian Ethics

1341 Words6 Pages

As we were discussing about career paths and passion in one of my classes last semester, I could recall from one of my classmates feeling very irresponsive about his career path. As he decided to share his opinions, he felt compelled by his parents to accomplish a very specific duty that runs back in the history and the background of their family. His passion was to go into sports management but his parents wanted him to become doctor. As he was sharing this, the first thing that came in my mind was the categorical imperative for Kant’s ethics which is the central philosophical concept in the deontological moral. By definition, categorical imperative is an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent …show more content…

For example, helping a blind pedestrian crossed the street because you feel pity and sorry is NOT considered a moral action by the ethical theory of duty by Kant. Furthermore, the action of helping a grandmother climb the stairs because you want to impress or show kindness is not seen as moral action. On the other hand, our actions can solely become moral if we do something out of our own sense, the sense of duty because we tell ourselves “we ought to help the elderly….” Kant used duty as a powerful tool but help people make decisions on reasoning. He believes that one must decide through reasoning which is the most important imperative to adhere to, but under no circumstances we should get rid of the idea of duties and make usage of our emotions and feelings as deciding factors in our …show more content…

In addition to that, Kant ethics theory argues that to will is to choose, voluntarily, to act in that way but a good will is the product of its relationship to duty. Duty brings the idea of actions we are obliged to perform. Those duties can either be moral or not moral. Moral actions that we perform are synonym of good will because they are voluntary as the Kantian ethical quotes “We ought to do” a good will is the primary steps for an ethical life and without it our actions cannot have moral worth and the duty we are obliged to perform makes us think of those actions. And those actions must be done from duty to have any

Show More
Related
1555 Words | 7 Pages

Deontological ethics is normative ethics theory which judges an action based on the rules rather than consequence of actions. The chief good of duty-based ethics as per Kant’s duty ethics is good will, which is most important factor that should be aimed to achieve or to do something that’s morally right. The decision-making factors in Kant’s deontology which determine if an action is morally right or wrong is having a good will, and doing duty for its own sake rather than for a benefit that results from the action. One of the ways decision-making factors can guide to determine morality of an action is to first, determine if motive of action was good or bad since good will is chief good in Kant’s duty ethics, and then determine if action was driven by self-interest or for the sake of duty because another factor requires in Kant’s duty ethics that duty to be done sake of or out respect for the moral law. First, quotes from Kant’s Grounding the Metaphysics of the Morals which supports Kant’s theory is “A good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes, nor because of its fitness to attain some proposed end; it is good through willing its willing, i.e. it is good in itself.”

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

Kantians believe that the rightness or wrongness of an action does not depend on the consequences, but on whether they fulfill a duty. They must act in a way that will produce the greatest overall amount of good in the world. In this view there is no obligation to give money to a homeless person, but it is the right thing to do. Kant’s supreme moral principle is the categorical imperative. The categorical imperative is a moral law that is unconditional for all agents because of intrinsic value.

Read More
1985 Words | 8 Pages

Categorical Imperative and Duties Kant divides duties into two groups- duties towards others and duties towards self. They are further subdivided into strict and meritorious duties. Lets consider these duties one by one in light of Categorical Imperative. Strict Duties to others : Consider a person is in need of money.

Read More
1318 Words | 6 Pages

Individual Learning Plan Sheila Morgan Walden University EDU-66100 Fall 2016-2017 Abstract The purpose of this paper is to evaluate my personal beliefs as an educator based upon the NBPTS core propositions and RWRCOEL Dispositions in Diversity, Technology and Professionalism. Provide examples of how I have demonstrated areas of high performance, and provide steps in which to work towards proficiency in areas I deem deficient or in need of improvement. As an educator the need for continuous self-reflection is essential to growing as a professional.

Read More
1162 Words | 5 Pages

The duty based ethics impose additional context on action and motivation to act, unlike reason based

Read More
983 Words | 4 Pages

Philosopher Immanuel Kant is one of the most known advocates for in-compatibilism, which, is the disbelief in a coexistence of both free will and determinism. Kant argues that morality implies rationality, and, that rationality implies freedom. Kant views rationality as normative in that it requires rules of both reason and morality. Meaning, to Kant, acting moral and thinking reasonably are similar as they are both prescriptions of rationality. Furthermore, Kant believes that morality, and specifically, moral law is a categorical imperative, not a hypothetical one.

Read More
328 Words | 2 Pages

Kant lays the groundwork for his moral theory in Chapter 2 of Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, emphasizing the idea of the categorical imperative. Kant argues that this imperative functions as the greatest moral standard, requiring people to act solely in conformity with principles that are able to be agreed upon by all. Kant's application of the categorical imperative leads him to oppose suicide. He contends that suicide lacks moral justification since it diminishes a person to nothing more than a tool, disregarding the intrinsic worth and dignity of thinking people. According to Kant, rational agents have inherent value and should be viewed as ends in and of themselves.

Read More
507 Words | 3 Pages

Kant also thought it was possible for pure reason to discover objective ethical truths. Kant believed that ethical truths must be categorical, universal, and be the product of reason. Kant’s categorical imperative states that a person should always act in such a way that they could will that act should be a universal law. This means that Kant thought that it was best to do the right thing, even if the person didn’t want to. This view of ethics focuses on what is right to do.

Read More
337 Words | 2 Pages

On the other hand, the duty ethics of Immanuel Kant seen ethic in a different light. Ethics is a rational process. People must use their reasoning to determine what is morally appropriate. Second, people must tell the truth, and third, the categorical imperative, one must behave in a sustainable fashion where humanity can all abide by. Rockler

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

Established by Kantian ethics is the duty of our actions. Kant states that through reflection and reason we can acquire our duties from the categorical imperative. The categorical imperative is a moral obligation that is not contingent on a specific individual. I find this claim credible especially in conflicts between patients and their physicians. This assertion is convincing based on the following reasons of equality, universality and responsibility.

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

In contrast to utilitarianism and other teleological approaches to moral reasoning, the deontological approach does not focus on the end result or the consequences of one’s actions. Instead, deontologists would argue that behaviors are morally just or unjust solely based on the behavior itself, separate from the chain reaction it initiates. Deontologists, as shown through the work of Kant, believe that morality and rationality are one in the same. There are three components that make up a moral action, according to Kant’s Categorical Imperative: first, the action must be universally moral, second, the action must treat other rational beings as ends themselves, rather than as means, and third, the action must be allowable for rational beings.

Read More
2014 Words | 9 Pages

(Kant, 13-14). According to Kant, my action would continue to be morally praiseworthy as long as a rational being did opened the door for others from a sense of duty, while not expecting any external reward or

Read More
1023 Words | 5 Pages

While utilitarian ethics focuses on producing the greatest happiness for the greatest number, deontological ethics focuses on what makes us worthy of happiness. For Kant, as for the Stocis and other who emphasize duty, we are worthy of happiness only when we do our duty. As Kant explained, morality “is not properly the doctrine of how we are to make ourselves happy but of how we are to become worthy of happiness.” For Kant, morality is not a “doctrine of happiness” or set of instructions on how to become happy. Rather, morality is the “rational condition of happiness”

Read More
1515 Words | 7 Pages

Decisions about right and wrong fill each and every day. Turmoil exists due to deciding if Deontology, where one acts based on the right motives, or if Utilitarianism, where one should act in a way that would produce the best results and consequences, should govern decisions and their morality. However, I believe Deontology, which is reason and duty based, serves as the superior way to dictate morality. In this paper, I will explain both the principles of Deontology and Utilitarianism, discuss the superior aspects of Deontology as compared to Utilitarianism, as well as grapple with objections to Deontology. While both ethical frameworks contain parts of ideologies that could be seen as valid, Kant’s theory on Deontology holistically remains

Read More
929 Words | 4 Pages

Kant believes that most people know right from wrong; the problem most people have is not in knowing what is morally, but in doing it. Kant also argued that rightness or wrongness of particular acts is determined by rules; these rules could be determined by his principle of universalizability. He also argued reason require not only that moral duties be universal but also absolutely binding. For instance, when lying is the only option to save someone’s life, still we shall not lie for it is morally wrong to lie. Kant introduced categorical imperative which states that people ought to do something regardless of the consequences.

Read More

More about What Role Does Virtue Ethics Play In Kantian Ethics

Related Topics

Open Document