First off is the differences in social structure between the North and South. During the 1800’s, from about 1830 to 1870, the abolitionist movement North was to abolish slavery and put an end to racial inequity. This ties in with the sole cause of civil war because the opposition to slavery in the North and South created an uprising or conflicts between the North and South. The reason why slavery is considered the sole cause because everything ties back to slavery as seen here. Southern slaveholders decided to fight the Northern union as they believed in black emancipation. Secondly, slavery was a way of life in the South. They believed that slavery wasn’t wrong and that black people were just animals or products. They traded them and sold them, some even enlisted their slaves in the Civil War. …show more content…
Slave owners was actually a very small number of people in the South, statistically 20% of families owned slaves. The reasoning for this is because those who owned slaves were wealthy and had power. Even if you did not own slaves, most still supported it. The main reason slavery was supported so greatly in the South was because the social system was so based around plantation and agriculture. “If a small farmer had extra produce or livestock for sale, his market was composed of the plantations and the middle-class professionals of the towns who served the interests of the planters. If a small farmer or a middle-class professional needed to borrow money, he had to borrow it from a planter or from a bank that was likely to be owned by planters (geosc).” The social system of the South was based off of this and the labor system was through slaves. If slavery was to go extinct, so would the wealth of slave owners. As well the society would have no power and would be