What Was The Impact Of Piracy On The Music Industry

Many civilians probably have a low perception of the history and potential threats that erupt from music piracy. The act of digital piracy has significantly impacted the music industry. Before the creation of the Internet, the act of piracy was physically committed and has since changed to a digital world of limitless copies. According to Tyler (2013) throughout the past couple of decades, a move from the tradition record label model which includes CD’s and physical records for example to digital music and individual song files. Since the creation of the Internet, the cost of copying music is basically nothing. According to Yar (2013) the emergence of piracy commenced significantly between 1999 and 2011, where sales plummeted 53 percent,

Since 1790 congress has focused on the economic incentives of what the potential protection copyright provides with the Copyright Act. In order to maximize beneficial works for society, congress extended protection to written musical configurations in 1897 to continue appropriate compensation. A number of benefits for authors of musical hard works arose from the creation of the Copyright Act of 1909. Benefits such as rights to reproduce distribute and publicly display works are just a few benefits of this act 1909. Original it was not deemed acceptable for not only the artists, but also the record label as well to license their works and receive payments for their creation of sound recordings until 1971. In the same year the Sound Recordings Act’s primary purpose was to ensure that unofficial copies, and handouts would be illegal under federal law. This act was carried over into the Copyright Act of 1976. Technology advancements continuously placed burdens on congress to continue to refine and adjust the Copyright Act. The right to perform copyrighted work publicly was granted by the Digital Performance Right in Sound Recording

In the United Kingdom where breaking the law is harshly punished regardless of the crime, the provisions they have in place for committing piracy are much greater than the United States (Yar, 2013). It’s not secret that the music industry itself, has requested stronger legislation to combat this crime. According to Moseley (2010), the RIAA has worked on two campaigns in order to discourage the distribution of online music piracy. The RIAA two campaigns are comprised of attacking companies who assist in the illegal online music sharing, and individuals. Due to cost efficiency and ineffectiveness, the RIAA pulled from attacking individuals in 2008. After this in the mid of 2009, two cases were decided which proceeded through the entire trail procedure, Capitol Records, Inc. v. Thomas-Rasset and Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbau. Not relevant to the campaign, these cases did clear up some uncertainties following copyright jurisprudence. In response to combating Napster, although it eventually was shut down, numerous other peer-to-peer sharing networks still