ipl-logo

Which Elements Of The Roman Republic Made It Democratic?

627 Words3 Pages

WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT UNIT 4
HIST 1421 GREEK AND ROMAN CIVILIZATION
UNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLE
INSTRUCTOR:CHRISTOPHER STENDER
5/3/2021

Circumstances that led to the establishment of the Roman Republic was overthrown of the Roman Kingdom, and the Romans conquered King Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, the legendary seventh king and final king who reigned Rome for 25 years; he was the last of the monarchy when Rome transitioned to the Republic (Roman Republic (509 BC – 27 BC) - History of Rome, 2019).
Which elements of the Republic made it democratic?
Roman Constitution was made up of three elements this includes:
The Consuls. It is the highest elected public official. They were primarily generals, and their task was to lead the armies to war; …show more content…

The Assemblies. This is the most important because people deserving of this position undergo elections. Moreover, they have the final say s to repeal or pass the law; the last decisions to go to war or for peace fall on them (The Roman Republic: From Aristocracy to Dictatorship – Constituting America, n.d.).
Which elements made you question the Republic’s democratic …show more content…

Generals are known to follow their minds, as they did not become general for anything; these are sharp-minded, tactical wise men; however, the Romans had two consuls to have accountability checks at the highest level of government and power balanced checked by the tribunes of the people. A Consul could veto his counterpart's actions; likewise, the tribunes can do the same to the consuls (The Roman Republic: From Aristocracy to Dictatorship – Constituting America, n.d.).Nevertheless, what happens if the two consuls agree to betray their responsibilities? Their power is next to a king; can they overthrow the sitting king?
Seven kings ruled Rome in the first 200 years. Under the monarchy, each king is credited with establishing a key of Roman tradition, constructing important building architecture that has influenced Western civilization (The Seven Kings | Western Civilization, n.d.).
The Roman Empire was divided into Western and Eastern empires in 286 AD. Its emperor ruled each; the western empire suffered several invasions by the Gothics and, in 455 AD, was sacked by Vandals. The decline of Rome continued; in 476 AD Western Roman Empire came to an end. The Eastern Rome Empire, the Byzantine Empire, survived until the 15th century AD. It fell when the Turks took over the capital city of Constantinople (The Roman Empire: A Brief History | Milwaukee Public Museum,

Show More
Related
327 Words | 2 Pages

How Democratic was the Roman Republic? Though, the Romans made undemocratic decisions, they still included the people in a lot of executive decisions. The Assemblies carried out the majority of what the people wanted and what they decided. Therefore, Rome allowed their citizens to help make important decisions about government, which made them democratic.

Read More
690 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic was often known for its lasting influence for the development of Western political governance and ideals and is often hailed as a beacon of democracy in ancient history. But an in depth look reveals it to be more complex. While the Roman Republic held democratic elements that allowed citizen participation and representation, its political structure was ultimately characterized by a significant concentration of power among the elite and few for the average person. This essay will explore the extent of democracy within the Roman Republic, analyzing key aspects such as the electoral system, legislative bodies, and social hierarchy and the democratic nature and the implications it had on the overall governance of the state.

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

As stated by Polybius in Document A, The Assembly held most power when it came to voting. They had the final say during the passing or denying of laws, which was said by Millar (Document B). However, Millar also states that the Assemblies did not get to choose who or what they voted on. This could be used to support the idea that the Roman Republic truly was a republic. Regardless of that, the fact that the Assembly held so much power was still a reason to believe it was a democracy.

Read More
440 Words | 2 Pages

Imperial Rome had a democratic government, where the people voted for everything. They had two classes, the patricians and the plebeians. The Plebeians had all the control over the Senate and the Consuls for a while. Eventually, the plebeians were given control over the Tribunes to give them a voice. The patricians were the wealthy, land owners, and the upper class citizens.

Read More
338 Words | 2 Pages

The Roman Republic was a government ruled by the people in Italy. Magistrates were officials and the most powerful were the consuls. The senate was a group of people who were wealthy and advised the city leaders. The American Democracy is a government with three branches. The executive branch is the presidents branch.

Read More
448 Words | 2 Pages

The Western Roman empire fell in 476 C.E.. The Roman Empire lasted nearly 500 years. Before the fall of the Western Empire, Constantine split the Roman Empire into two parts, west and east. He moved the government and the capital to Byzantine (later renamed Constantinople). While ancient Rome and modern day America are very different in some ways, they are similar in other ways.

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic lasted from 509 B.C.E to 27 B.C.E. The Roman Republic was democratic, but not always. Such as when the wealthy took over, it was more difficult to become a Roman citizen, and there was a lot of division in the society. However it was still democratic because they let the majority of legal men vote, even the free slaves later on, the people had a voice, and everyone mainly had a job to do in order to help the community. The Roman Republic tried to be democratic, but then it led to it just being an aristocracy.

Read More
273 Words | 2 Pages

How democratic was the Roman Republic? Historians and professors have debated this topic for years. This republic developed in Ancient Rome while Greece was flourishing. They had been led by kings, but the leaders abused the power, so a group of patricians overthrew the king, Tarquin the Proud. However, the Roman Republic was not very democratic for many reasons.

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

Democracy is what we call a formation of government where citizens and group of people can vote on laws. The Roman Republic did not have a well developed formation of their government but it did have the qualifications of democracy. There were pros and cons of voting in the Roman times such as anybody can vote. According to Professor Millar, he says, “Every adult male citizen, unless specifically disqualified, had a vote, and there was no formal exclusion of the poor. Free slaves could also vote.”

Read More
148 Words | 1 Pages

Consuls were the top of the Roman Republic. This was a very powerful position. This all changed when Julius Caesar decided to take in an army and force the Senate into new leadership.

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

Republic is defined as "A government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law." (Republic., n.d.). Rome would elect its leaders from all of the groups of people, Patrician and Plebeian alike. The head of state was the consuls,

Read More
1489 Words | 6 Pages

The Romans had a system of indirect democracy where the people had the power to vote for representatives who would advocate for them on the state level. The Greeks had a government in which the people directly were involved in the governmental and legislative process. In addition, both systems were flawed in their representation of their people in their respective governments through neglecting a large portion of their population. Both societies did well to create term lengths to decrease the likelihood of corruption and abuse of power through creating accountability. However, the Greek democracy was a caliber above its counterpart.

Read More
879 Words | 4 Pages

Some historians claim that there are as many as a hundred political and non-political interweaving reasons that led to the collapse of Roman Empire. One of the important political causes is the division of the Empire into two empires, the west (Latin) and the eastern (Greek, later known as the Byzantine empire) in 284 A.D. by Diocletian. This division was adopted to protect the over-expanding empire and to defend its borders against the Barbarian attacks. This was achieved initially as the two empires synchronized responsibilities and strengthened each.

Read More
481 Words | 2 Pages

The Western Roman Empire fell in 476 AD. There were many factors that went into the fall of the Roman Empire. Economic problems they dealt with was one of the main reasons the Empire fell. Since the romans were not doing good Economically they could not fund the military in order to protect them, which also led to the fall of their military. Socio-Political problems were also a factor; there was a decline in interest to public affairs.

Read More
486 Words | 2 Pages

These tribes were able to exploit Rome's economic and political instability, and they were able to gain control of large portions of the empire. Another aspect that contributed to the fall of the Roman Empire was the division of the empire into two parts, the Western Roman Empire and the Eastern Roman Empire (McNeill 2009). This division weakened the empire's military power and made it more vulnerable to invasion. In 476 CE, Germanic tribes, led by Odoacer, deposed the last emperor of the Western Roman Empire, Romulus Augustus, and the Western Roman Empire officially came to an end.

Read More

More about Which Elements Of The Roman Republic Made It Democratic?

Related Topics

Open Document