Which Period Of The Second Industrial Revolution Were Socially Progressive Or Regressive?

1245 Words5 Pages

The period of the Second Industrial Revolution, which took place between the late 19th and early 20th centuries, was marked by significant advancements in industrialization and modernization. During this period, a series of inventions and innovations led to the rise of new industries, the expansion of existing ones, and the creation of a new social and economic order. However, the question of whether industrialization and modernization during this period were socially progressive or regressive remains a subject of debate. There were many benefits of the Second Industrial Revolution, such as an increase in productivity and efficiency, advancements in technology, and the expansion of the middle class. However, this revolution also had many negative …show more content…

With the increased availability of books and newspapers, people had access to more information, which helped promote literacy and education. As people began to realize the importance of education, there was a push to improve the quality of the education being offered. This led to the development of new teaching methods and curricula, which helped to enhance the learning experience for students. Additionally, the development of standardized testing helped to ensure that students were receiving a high-quality education. The Second Industrial Revolution also helped to expand access to education. The establishment of public education systems and laws enforcing education helped ensure that more people had access to education. Before the revolution, only children from wealthy families had the luxury of going to school and getting an education. But with the new technological advancements and the newfound desire for education, more children from poorer backgrounds were able to attend school. The establishment of universities and colleges aided in expanding access to higher education. This provided opportunities for people to advance their careers and improve their economic prospects. The advancements in education during the Second Industrial Revolution laid the foundation for the modern education system, making it an essential period in …show more content…

Some may state that the revolution was socially regressive, rather than progressive, due to the rise of social and economic inequality and urbanization. However, despite these negative aspects, the Second Industrial Revolution's legacy is generally considered socially progressive. This is due to the long-term effects of the social progressions that emerged during this period. The labor movement, for instance, continues to play a critical role in fighting for workers' rights today. Furthermore, the growth of the middle class has led to a more stable and prosperous society. Joel Mokyr, an American-Israeli economic historian, stated, "As a result, the second Industrial Revolution extended the rather limited and localized successes of the first to a much broader range of activities and products. Living standards and the purchasing power of money increased rapidly, as the new technologies reaches like never before into the daily lives of the middle and working classes" (Mokyr 2). Additionally, the advances in technology and manufacturing that occurred during the Second Industrial Revolution have laid the groundwork for continued growth and development in the modern era. Buşra Taşkan, Buket Karatop, and Cemalettin Kubat state in their journal that "all events in the industrial revolutions have triggered each other" (Taşkan, Karatop, & Kubat 108). This displays that all

More about Which Period Of The Second Industrial Revolution Were Socially Progressive Or Regressive?