This source is informing my thinking about what factors shaped soldiers’ individual and collective experiences by illustrating in depth the stories of these Canadian soldiers in the 1st Canadian Division. An example would be in Chapter 5: Green Clouds, which describes the pivotal reactions of the soldiers and how they dealt with the cruel situations they faced. These accounts help me understand how the soldiers developed their identities through their collective experiences, and how what they faced affected them, in either a positive or negative way. This source is shaping my research by keeping me interested in the topic ranges of which the book provides. Reading the source results in me doing further research on the things that stand out to me, such as the personal accounts of these soldiers, and other things that I know will further help me strengthen my
5. The author has analyzed the style of the text and the historical context of the memoir. Each element contains sufficient analysis with textual and outside resources used as evidences. The quotes are well chosen and do fit the text-to-analysis ratio throughout the analysis. The analysis is decent in length, not crowded with summaries to the quotes.
Her husband was on the Continental army side. The war and battles have made him very sick so that is why she is telling the story. She will be telling 3 things that she thought were they were the most important in the war. Her name is Maria Rolon.
Angela's Ashes is a book written by Frank McCourt. Frank was born in Brooklyn during the depression-era in 1930. This book is a autobiography. The genre nonfiction. He used this piece to inform us of his life.
The other, tells a courageous story that was also faced with great overcoming. The two accounts show similarities and differences that impacted the war and history
At this point of the memoir, Frank is confused about how he should act towards his father because he remembers the time that his father actually acted like a father and not a drunk (Shannon). In chapter eight, Frank compares his father to the Holy Trinity by describing the three different people he sees in his father. He separates his father from being a “parental figure” for him and being an alcoholic. Frank appreciates the good times that he spent with his father and cherishes their memories together but he knows that his father is too irresponsible to count on for anything (Gale).
Storytelling has such a large impact on all stages of life. Stories are told to teach a lesson, give hope, or get someone through a hard time. Tim O’Brien uses storytelling in his book, The Things They Carried, to teach lessons from war, and help readers understand about the baggage people bring to war. The publisher section of this novel has this warning in it, "This is a work of fiction. Except for a few details regarding the author's own life all incidents, names, and characters are imaginary” (O'Brien).
You separate it from yourself. You pin down certain truths" (158). O’Brien makes numerous conflicting comments on storytelling during certain chapters of the novel, such as "How to Tell a True War Story. " By making these comments, the narrator not only justifies the objective of The Things They Carried, but also provides clues regarding the content, composition, and interpretation of the novel. O’Brien states that: "In any war story, but especially a true one, it's difficult to separate what happened from what seemed to happen.
When the short story begins, it reveals that the author was overruled by the impact of the war and how it damaged him as an individual, and how he betrays his religion, family and self Right from the beginning of the book the man states that "This is one story I 've
“How to Tell a True War Story” and “Ambush” are stories that both explore on topics: truth, the real definition of a true war story, and the role of truth. O 'Brien starts off “How to Tell a True War Story” with “This is true.” Starting this story with such a bold sentence not only makes it seem more true, but to some extent, it acts as a comfort statement to the narrator’s own doubts, as if there were unspeakable uncertainties and lies of the narrator. The title of this story also comes into play, with a meta-fictional name “How to Tell a True War Story”, as if it were a guide, a manual, having a true war story tell the readers how to tell a true war story. However ironically, towards the middle of the story, us as
It is at that point that O’Brien relates what he refers to as “the happening truth.” After twenty years, O’Brien is left “with faceless responsibility and faceless grief.” This is where stories become significant. Stories, as O’Brien argues can “make things present… I can look at things I never looked at. I can attach faces to grief and love and
Telling a true war story can be hard to do, because soldiers are tempted to change some traumatic aspects to make the story easier to comprehend, and not so traumatic for the listener. For the readers who prefer the brutal and gruesome stories,
This technique is supported when he includes Rat Kileys narration in his story, while all at once, allowing the reader to understand that Kiley is known for embellishing. “The question is not of deceit. Just the opposite: he wanted to heat up the truth, to make it burn so hot that you would feel exactly what he felt” (Kaplan 5/8). By O’Brien allowing Kiley to express his view of the war, he further sustains the writing technique used to reinforce the belief that with numerous narrations, he provides the audience the opportunity to depict and imagine their own reality of the war. The war stories told through each individual soldier’s perspective, but more significantly, with their own emotions towards the war and the events which occurred during the war.
This shows us that we don’t have proof of the credibility of some of these memoirs. We could read a memoir, and be manipulated by the danger of a single story. Articles, newspapers, and books may be exaggerated and far from the truth. Many people will just read an piece of literature or hear of news and assume it’s true without second guessing it, especially if it is from the media. When referring to
Intro Name:Jayson lostaunau in the article pro/con: Are our school lunches healthy enough by McClatchy-tribute news service the genera is real problems. The article is about the first lady's choice in making school lunches healthier.the thesis is we could have healthy lunch but we could have something else that is not so healthy but can keep us eating lunch,because if the lunch is nasty then we won't eat and get sick from not eating. If we have something that we like then we won't get sick. TAG Brief Summary b Thesis(Reason 1, reason 2, reason 3) Body Paragraph 1 Name:Esmeralda Prieto
