Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Perspectives on indian removal act
Perspectives on indian removal act
Voices chapter 7 indian removal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Perspectives on indian removal act
Perspectives on indian removal act
Voices chapter 7 indian removal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Andrew Jackson was president starting in 1824 and while he was in office, people had many different views on him. One of those views was that he exercised power as a total and absolute monarch. He was even given the nickname of “King Andrew the First.” Jackson should be viewed as an absolute monarch because instead of electing his cabinet, he appointed them, giving positions to his supporters. He also fired his whole cabinet, which only made people happy to see him as a tyrant.
Andrew Jackson has found his way onto the modern day $20 bill; however, does he deserve his picture on our $20 bill? The answer to that question is no. Andrew Jackson was completely against any kind of bank. Jackson also founded the corrupt “spoils system”. These points are only two of the many things Jackson did that makes us question why he is on our $20 bill.
It is clear from the documents that Andrew Jackson acted like a king. One reason that Andrew Jackson acted like a king was he forced the Cherokee out of their homelands. In document 4, the political cartoon depicts Andrew Jackson is stepping on two controversial issues, The rechartering of the National Bank and the Supreme Court ruling against the Indian Removal Act because it was unconstitutional. Mr. Jackson clearly ignored the Constitution and the Supreme Court completely because the law was passed anyway. Because of this, many Cherokee families were forced from their homes and moved west to Oklahoma through a march known now as the Trail of Tears.
The image illustrates Andrew Jackson’s creation of a “spoil system”, which gave government positions to individuals who supported him and who he believed would act in his interests. Jackson originally fabricated this system to push individuals to back him in the presidential election.. This visual asserts the popular opinion by the losing party in this election of the corruptness the system and the hunger for power and greed that fueled it.
Have you ever thought of the real impact Andrew Jackson had on the U.S. I think he was not the right fit for the office. Andrew Jackson’s presidency was terrible. My first point is that he abused his power and acted like a king. My second point is he caused rapid inflation and my final point is he spoiled people with jobs.
The word 'spoils' means incidental, secondary, benefits reaped by a winner. The people Jackson put in place of those he removed were those who were secondary to him, like his right hand men that upheld the same policies as he and who similar to him had the interests of the common man in mind. They were like extensions of himself that made things more efficient. Jackson removed the initial people so that he could reach his goal of really making a change for the common people, and show them that the government wasn’t dominated by greedy rich people that only represented a select handful. These motives stemmed from his humble beginnings one could say.
Secondly, the Spoils System was about President Jackson’s “Pet Banks” and going against Congress to take the federal funds out of the treasury. President Jackson did not like the national banks system
In conclusion, there is much evidence to support the idea that Andrew Jackson was a tyrant and vastly abused his power in presidency. Jackson was a cruel ruler for his actions, some including the Indian Removal Act, his overuse of vetoing, and his temper and personality. Overall he was just not right for the position of a political
His decisions have been disputed for many years, yet the reason his decisions were disputed are the same. Were his actions justified or not? Despite the controversy of this question, his drastic actions were taken too far making them unjustified. Andrew Jackson was well known for the removal of Indians from eastern lands during 1838 and 1839 which is known as the Indian Removal Act. The reasoning behind this was simple, white settlers wanted the Indians land for farming.
He would fire elected federal workers and replace them with people who supported him (Appleby. Page 340). It is not fair that unelected officials should carry out laws. The fired employees charged Jackson for being a tyrant, Jackson just told them that it was best for democracy, which was a lie (Appleby, Page 340). The replacement of government officials with the election winner’s supporters is called the Spoils System (Appleby, Joyce Oldham.
Back in the 19th century members were appointed to office using the spoils system, which pretty much means after winning an election, the political party or president gives government jobs to its supporters, friends, and relatives as a reward for working toward victory, and as an incentive to keep working for the party. After people became fed up with the spoils system and a disappointed officer assassinated President Garfield they started using the merits system. The merits system is the process of promoting and hiring government employees based on their ability to perform a job, rather than on political connections. The spoils system was developed about 150 years ago.
One of the biggest thing that Jackson had done as a president was in 1832. Jackson vetoed a bill that would renew the second bank charter early. Jackson stated “I will kill it!”. He said this because he didn’t like the bank at all and he believed that it made the rich richer and the poor poorer. He said in his veto message “It is easy to conceive that great evils to our country and its institutions might flow from such a concentration of power in the hands of a few men irresponsible to the people.”
He started by replacing many government jobs to officials with his supporters”. This is a major reasons why Jackson was bad. He would be considered an absolute Monarch or King. An example of this is when the Supreme Court sides with the Indians against the state of Georgia, and jackson ignores the supreme court’s ruling. The “spoils system” corrupted the government because no one had a chance to get good at their
Andrew Jackson contributed many conspicuous matters to the United States throughout his presidential term. Many debates remain active concerning the intention of the seventh president of our nation. When some retrospect the essence of Jackson, they would confirm that he is accurately known for representing the rights of the common man, and for being at the forefront of our modern democratic party. On the contrary, others will condemn this once so ordinary, “common” man for possessing an insatiable crave of power that was occupied within this insidious prime minister. Jackson revealed his underlying intentions through his colossal aggregate of slaves, serving as the basis of the Trail of Tears, and his overabuse of the Spoils System.
The era of Andrew Jackson which was nicknames the era of the “common man” certainly lived up to its name. As the seventh President of the United States, Jackson had a major effect on the life of the common man, in such a way that the life of the common man would never be the same again. Jackson’s aim, after the manner in which he was defeated in the Presidential Election of 1824, despite receiving more popular votes than John Quincy Adams who took on the office, was to reduce the power and the authority of the elite. When he came into power after the 1828 election Jackson began to carry out his proposals. Jackson expanded the voting right to all men, in accordance with the Declaration of Independence of 1776 which declared that “all men are created equal” instead of just the elite.