However what if Roosevelt never won the election of 1932 and Hoover won instead, if Hoover had not had a strict Laissez Faire policy, and was instead a socialists. History may have been rewritten. When Hoover was president he believed in individualism, but what if he was more of a socialist? If Hoover had decided to create new acts to help the economy through the Great Depression before the end of his last term, Hoover would have never lost the confidence of the American people. In Hoovers first 100 days in office, in 1929, he planned on helping Americans in poverty. To do so Hoover used a philosphy of associatalism, which encouraged individuals of the United States to work together and solve there common economic issues. Hoover hoped the …show more content…
As well as the National Credit Corporation which provided lending agencies that would be able to give banks, on the brink of foreclosure, money that could be used for loans. Herbert Hoover accomplished much during his first term, and with the help of the American people, he won the Election of 1932. Herbert Hoover won against Franklin D. Roosevelt because he was not afraid to take a stand to help the economy when it needed it the most, and Americans looked up to that and believed he would end the Great Depression much faster, since he had already improved the economy so much. Hoover had won both the Democratics some republicans because he was following a loose and strict government in which he would send help throughout society and the economy when needed but also focused on individualism. After the great depression had surpassed Hoover relied remained a capitalist but would fall into a socialist category when America needed