This paper will be on United States presidential election of 1932, held on November 8, 1932, in which Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt defeated Republican President Herbert Hoover, and election of 2016, held November 8, 2016, in which Democrat Hilary Clinton lost to Republican Donald Trump.
According to WhiteHouse.gov, “Before serving as America's 31st President from 1929 to 1933, Herbert Hoover had achieved international success as a mining engineer and worldwide gratitude as "The Great Humanitarian" who fed war-torn Europe during and after World War I”, he is a son of blacksmith, born in an Iowa village in 1874, grew up in Oregon, and enrolled at Stanford University in 1891, graduating as a mining engineer. He brought unparalleled reputation
…show more content…
Trump was able to harness hatred in American electorate to his advantages. He promised heaven and earth with no backup plans or details, and his campaign shows American differences and not diversity. Unlike Trump, Hilary ran organized campaign with detailed information, preaching messages on inclusion and plans to continue the good work of incumbent president. Hilary faces many obstacles during her campaign trying to be the first female president in American history, even the female electorate that oath to support her, opposes her.
Trump most effective propagandas were lies, fake information, and attack on any media outfits who tries to set the record straight unlike Roosevelt’s campaign that was full of fact and detailed plan. There were so many lies and fake information about Hilary, to the extent that electorates were confused on who or what to believe, while Hilary major propagandas was public speaking and new media like Hoover’s election campaign, though Hilary made use of all modern technique unlike Hoover’s