ipl-logo

Why Do We Need A Bystander Not Take Action In Time Of Trouble

604 Words3 Pages

A bystander is a person who is present at an event or incident but does not take part. Should a bystander not take action in time of trouble? This can make odds even worse than it already is establish, or tables could turn for the better. Changes happen in America, because a bystander decided to take a stand against the wrong doings or in a horrific situation. However, bystanders do not have the responsibility to arbitrate in times of trouble. Therefore it only takes one to actually stand up and speaks out, or get involved to make a change. Bystanders do not have the responsibility to get involved, yet they do have the opportunity. Some persons choose to run towards the problem instead of running away from it, for they possess that heroic quality to help others in time of trouble. “There will undoubtedly come a time when you are faced with a situation in which you can intervene and help stop a potentially dangerous situation - stopping someone from driving drunk, eliminating bullying behavior, or preventing a sexual assault from occurring.” (Samuel Merritt University) When you hear of horrific situation occurring, you may think to yourself “What is the …show more content…

Are you going to stand by and wondering who will be the next, or will you stand up and be the next. It took those like Martin Luther King Jr. to not just stand by, but stand up to bring a change to inequality. Rosa Park didn’t just stand by, but stood up by not giving up her seat on the bus. “Now that she is facing her moments of suffering as a results of the renewals that she faced, I know that all people of goodwill will come to her rescue.” (The Martin Luther King, Jr. Papers Project) Since those person decided to stand up and not stand by, we now live in a world where that inspiration made numerous of others stand up against anything they find fit to make the world a better place for you and

Show More
Related
867 Words | 4 Pages

However, there are some things that can break the bystander effect. When one person decides to help the other human in distress it is very likely that other people will join in to helping them. Another thing, if this person dressed up in something modern that an important person would wear to a business meeting or a fancy party. What happens is the people think that because that person is dressed up like them they are “One of us” and they also think that it could be them in distress. In other words, they have more empathy for people they view as similar to them.

Read More
902 Words | 4 Pages

Written by Martin Gansberg, the article “37 Who Saw Murder Didn’t Call Police”, he communicates that bystander’s actions were significant because when someone is screaming the first instinct should be to call attention to it, the right thing to do is help, and it could have saved Genovese’s life. Bystander’s actions can go a long way, saving a life for example. When this story is told, it is often hard for many to believe, but it happened. Just with the simple action of picking up the phone, it could have stopped Kitty Genovese’s unjust

Read More
421 Words | 2 Pages

Bystanders are guilty because they have the power to speak, but never do. In the “Noble Prize” Eli Wiesel tells us, “Neutrality helps the oppressor never the victim”(Eli Wiesel). He means that even without helping either side intentionally, not speaking does nothing to make anything better. When remaining silent it is just as bad as being included, because it only helps the problems continue.

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

Every day many of us are faced with the question, “Should I step in and help?”. Some of us immediately think yes and jump in to help, while others believe it is better to keep walking. The bystander effect happens when a person does not stop and help because they think someone else will. In these situations, some people stand up and respond to the crisis, because they are not worried about what will happen to them, but what will happen to the person in crisis instead. In the novel Night and the poem “The Hangman”, the bystander effect took place because people were afraid to bring attention to themselves.

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

Many inhumane acts are occurring every day whether you know it or not, but those that do know has the choice to be a bystander or to help them and speak out. Their decision and actions plays a big role in these situations. Many often chooses to stay silent, but that may be the most dangerous thing to do. Even though there are some cons to speaking out, it could save a person’s life and prevent it from happening again. One may think that it’s not their responsibility to help the victim, but that is not exactly true.

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

Every day many of us are faced with the question, “Should I help?”. Some of us immediately think yes and jump in to help, while others believe it is better to keep walking. The bystander effect happens when a person does not stop and help because they think someone else will. In these situations, some people stand up and respond to the crisis, because they are not worried about what will happen to them but what will happen to the person in crisis. In the novel Night and the poem “The Hangman”, the bystander effect took place because people were afraid to bring attention to themselves.

Read More
1199 Words | 5 Pages

The Bystander Effect stems from altruism, which is selfless goodness. The Lords of Discipline showcases many instances of this effect, and discusses the notorious murder of Kitty Genovese in which the very concept was conceptualized. Not only does the story influence the practice of this effect, but it also discourages it, therefore bemusing its students on how to react in emergency situations. The repercussions of falling fault to this effect can be in some cases lethal, and can compromise one’s social life. Kitty Genovese would still be alive today had her neighbors not been negligent to the cries heard from

Read More
725 Words | 3 Pages

We all believe that when you hear someone in a crisis you tend to freeze, not react the way others would want you to. Yes, it might be easy to pick up the phone, call the authorities as an anonymous caller, but what if the criminal saw you pick up the phone? Your mind gets you paranoid into thinking things that aren’t real, which results in you not do anything to help the person that was attacked but only help themselves. Some say that the benefits of having the bystander law will protect many American citizens and its society. Although some benefits of the law are credible such as starting a chain reaction to get everyone else involved can also be

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

Bystanders are people who see oppression, but they don’t do anything to stop it. “The Hangman” by Maurice Ogden shows how bystanders affect an oppressed society and what they do during oppression. The narrator in “The Hangman” is a bystander that watches as his happy town slowly diminishes until he is the last one alive because he did nothing. In Forbidden City Alex is a bystander in the beginning because he started recording the PLA, but it was for Lao Xu and because he was his father's son (Bell, 118). He heard the shooting but he did nothing to attempt to stop it or anything else.

Read More
717 Words | 3 Pages

This must change. Bystanders must do everything they can in order to stop a crime. If a bystander simply witnesses a crime and does nothing to help, they are almost as bad as the criminal. For example, Ruth Krug tells of her own experience of being raped. A man she knew

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

Bystander behaviour can generally be described as the actions people take when they witness an emergency situation in a public place. There have been many studies on bystander behaviour, this essay will explore two approaches to explain this behaviour. It will look at the experimental method performed by Latané and Darley and at the discourse analysis done by Levine. First the essay will describe and outline the methods.after that it will examine the similarities as well as the contrast between those techniques. Latané and Darley did their research on bystander behaviour in the aftermath of the murder case of Catherine `Kitty´ Genovese,which happened in the Suburbs of New York in 1964.

Read More
1157 Words | 5 Pages

In discussions of the Bystander Law, one controversial issue with bystanders in our society today is if one person doesn 't react and there is two other people with them, the other two won 't react. For people who don’t know the definition of a bystander, it means a person who is present at an event or incident but doesn’t respond. Why follow someone else when you can be an individual? People who believe that we as individuals shouldn’t have the law, but the reason that people wouldn’t follow the law if we enforce it. On the other hand, those who believe that our own selves should have the law contend that there should be consequences.

Read More
880 Words | 4 Pages

Not one person did anything and they let her bleed to death. This horrible tragedy should have never been let get to the extent that it did. What kind of a human being watches another’s life being taken away and does nothing. The devastating murder of Kitty Genovese was a great example of the bystander effect. What is the bystander

Read More
1392 Words | 6 Pages

“The bystander effect.” Author used this term to describe public. When there were emergency situation occur the first thing that fall into their minds were watched with folded arms. They will observe others reaction and followed. If one of them stood up and voiced out, they will do the same things too.

Read More
706 Words | 3 Pages

One reason bystanders do not take action is because of the “bystander effect.” The bystander effect is a psychological phenomenon in which individuals, typically surrounded by others, do not demonstrate any course of action in helping victims in distress. Social psychology professors, John Darley

Read More

More about Why Do We Need A Bystander Not Take Action In Time Of Trouble

Related Topics

Open Document