ipl-logo

Why Is It Important To Get Parliamentary Support In 1918

533 Words3 Pages

The peaceful campaigns and mass support was not enough for bills to be passed. Martin Pugh claimed that the moderate suffragists exercised a more significant influence than the militant suffragettes up to 1914 did and the period 1918 – 1928 did not witness a revolutionary change in the position and view of women. Martin Pugh is more critical about the women’s suffrage; he rejects the view that women’s work in the war was accountable for the development of women’s legal position in 1918. He has been criticised, as he concentrates on parliamentary debates and reform in his book focusing mostly on the non- violent methods that had contributed to parliamentary support, thus undermining the impact of the WSPU. His view is convincing to some extent, as the peaceful measures …show more content…

However, the WSPU had drawn attention to the cause when NUWSS had failed to, through violent campaign tactics, getting an undeserved reputation as a radical organisation. The message of improving women’s legal rights and enabling women to vote was promoted consistently, leading to many members of WSPU being arrested. The increasing sympathy from the public, led to the movement being publicised through the militancy. The campaigns of NUWSS was not enough to pass the bills and women's right to vote, thus, limiting the significance of NUWSS and Pugh’s view on militancy. The contributions of women within the war and militant campaigning improved women's legal rights.
The militant actions led to public disapproval, due to the violence associated with the WSPU. The violence allowed the Suffragettes to gain attention but their actions ultimately were

Open Document