1) I personally think that Sue did wasted valuable training funds. Sue was trying to get a plan to help the employees to develop a better way for reading but in a faster way. Since the employees were just using this way just at home and not at their work, this was not Sue’s purpose. Sue put all her hope on this training program, since it was very effective in other companies but on hers it did not. I can say the memos and policy announcements are important to the company because if they get through the employees desks every day is because the company wants the employees to read them and get information from them. Reading the memos and policy announcements of her company is very important for all employees and not being able to read it, it means that these employees speed reading training program was not effective. I think that Sue’s company reading is one of the most important things and that’s why they put speed reading training for many of the employees on the company. Employees are not using it at work then that means that it was not worthy. At the same time I see that it was worthy, but in their personal life because many employees say that they use it at home, but not on their working life, but on Sue’s company it …show more content…
Since I can also tell that it worked with the employees because they used it on their personal life but not at work. The only thing that I can see here is that the employees don’t want to use it at work, but that the training did work on them. By this, I can personally say that if the employees do not want to read the memos and the policy announcements are because they do not want to. Sue should do a need analysis because this is a way of how she can prevent the waste of money on a training that does not need it on the