ipl-logo

Why Is It Morally Permissible To Eat Under Ordinary Circumstances

392 Words2 Pages

1) There tends to be different kinds of cheeseburgers and I’m going to prove whether its morally permissible to eat cheeseburgers under “ordinary circumstances”

2) A) P1: It is NOT morally permissible to kill human beings for cheeseburgers
P2: If there is no relevant difference or justification that separates them, killing animals for food is the same as killing human beings for cheeseburgers
C: Therefore, eating a cheeseburger is not morally permissible. B) This is a moral argument. It is strong to the extent that a cheeseburger has never been a significant factor of harm in everyday life. C) killing human beings for food, or cannibalism, is not morally permissible. The killing of farm animals even with a justification does not make it morally permissible to kill animals for food

3) A)
P1: It’s not wrong for non-humans to kill other non-humans
P2: Humans need nutrients to live as well as non-humans
C: Therefore, it is not wrong for humans to kill …show more content…

The argument for the killing of farm animals even with a justification does not make it morally permissible to kill animals for cheeseburgers seems fairly compelling, since it appears to capture the essential aspect of the harmful effects of not considering animals interest in staying alive. Still, we cannot just wave away the problem raised by non-humans killing other non-humans not being immoral as an option. I believe we can avoid being committed to these conclusions by pointing out the following: 1) most non-humans need meat to survive 2) humans also need meat to survive, and 3) in addition to needing meat to survive its killing a member of the same species is less moral than killing a member of a different species. This gives us independent reasons to believe that killing non-humans for cheeseburgers is morally

Show More
Related

Rhetorical Analysis Of On Eating Roadkill

119 Words | 1 Pages

Will you be eating roadkill tonight for dinner?   In Brenden Buhler’s “On Eating Roadkill”, the author is asking whether the citizens of the United States would consider eating roadkill, and if, in fact, we are aware that we already have. “So for those on the fence (or outright repelled) by the concept, consider this:  because gelatin ends up in everything from marshmallows to gummy bears to ice cream, there’s a good chance that you’ve already consumed, legally, some accidental meat.” (206) Buhler has convinced this reader that eating roadkill is a viable option for feeding some of our homeless here in America.

Read More

Jonathan Foer Let Them Eat Dog Rhetorical Analysis

1521 Words | 7 Pages

In Jonathan Foer’s argumentative essay “Let Them Eat Dog”, he makes a very convincing argument for the consumption of dog, a surprising topic to argue for. However, when one reads through his excerpt, it’s quite difficult to escape the sound logic he utilizes throughout the piece. Ranging from commentary on the taste of dog meat to points about the ecological impact it would have if the U.S. started eating dog, Foer is persuasive and reasonable. So reasonable, in fact, that it begs the reader to question exactly why he would put so much effort into arguing for eating dog, something that most people won’t change their minds on no matter how logical the argument is. Foer even admits at the end of his essay that despite his best efforts, people

Read More

Jonathan Safran Foer Against Meat Summary

1144 Words | 5 Pages

Further, Foer uses logical fallacies as he says “quitting smoking is the easiest thing you can do, he did all the time. I would add vegetarianism to the list of easy things” (Foer ,2009, para15). What we eat defines us and the author is unable to convince his readers mainly because when it comes to food all of us rationalize our food choices and ethics come into play however, I agree with the author that we shouldn’t eat meat because it harms the environment, but I also feel that the pros of eating meat heavily outnumber the cons and that isn’t a strong enough reason to convince his readers into quitting meat as it is quite beneficial for the body and is also delicious at the same time.

Read More

Horse Slaughter Persuasive Speech

83 Words | 1 Pages

And you're reading my words wrong on purpose. C'mon, you can do better than that, can't you? But just in case you actually didn't for some reason understand what I meant, here's an example: let's say a horse was executed because it had a serious leg injury that couldn't be healed. We all know people eat meat that comes from horses, don't we? So, isn't it good to eat said horse's meat instead of let's say someone's that was solely executed for meat?

Read More

Plutarch The Morality Of Eating Meat

1149 Words | 5 Pages

This article presents new ideas, possibilities, and solutions for those who are against eating meat that will be available in the near future. Although these writers are from different times, and with different backgrounds, they all shared an underlying question of the morality surrounding eating

Read More

David Copp's Animal, Fundamental Moral Standing, And Speciesism

812 Words | 4 Pages

“Morality is fundamentally concerned with advancing human welfare. More specifically, morality is concerned to advance human welfare by enabling human beings to live together successfully in the societies” (349). David states the reason it is wrong to killing animals for no reason is “permitting killing members of other societies would risk undermining society's ability to achieve needed peaceful and harmonious relations with other societies” (354). So, in our moral code unkind action like these are prohibited because people do want our society to become successful and allowing people killing is not going to help that. Besides that, David continues shows another argument that different culture value animal’s welfare differently.

Read More

Conscientious Meat Eater Analysis

796 Words | 4 Pages

In the article, “Is It Possible to be a Conscientious Meat Eater”, the authors argue that processed meat can greatly affect the many things in our everyday life. Sunaura and Alexander’s argument is significantly unreliable because of the certain professions both authors yield. As stated in the article “Sunaura is an artist, writer, and activist in Oakland.” “Alexander’s profession is studying philosophy, and ethics in Athens, Georgia.” This shows that neither of them are qualified to argue in the subject of conscientious meat eaters.

Read More

Good Vs. Evil In Hawthorne's Young Goodman Brown

998 Words | 4 Pages

The singer, Eric Burdon, once said that “Inside each of us, there is the seed of both good and evil. It's a constant struggle as to which one will win. And one cannot exist without the other.” Good and evil must coexist in the world; in order for us to know what goodness is, we must know about evil. If we have no sense of what goodness is, then evil is nonexistent.

Read More

Consider The Lobster By David Foster Wallace Summary

1067 Words | 5 Pages

However, ethics do play a role, in that morals is one of the elements that separates us from other animals. I believe that if you kill an animal or plant for food, you should put a majority of it to use in some way. I also believe animals and plants that are grown as a source of food should have as little interaction with humans as possible. We should not eat animals and plants if we are endangering their existence by eating them. As long as animal or plant does not fall into one of these exceptions, then I believe it is ethically permissible to eat

Read More

Fishing Vs Hunting

2120 Words | 9 Pages

Some may choose to go to a grocery store and pay for the things that are processed, rather than going and getting the freshest, free version of the same thing, in their own backyard. In cases like these, those who choose this method are not keeping any animals alive by doing so. They have to be killed first to get to the grocery store anyways. Even with that being said, many would see killing an animal to use as food as the cruelest thing a

Read More

Comparing Animal Treatment In Hinduism And Christianity

604 Words | 3 Pages

To eat them… Or not to eat them… It has become a huge ethical issue as Hinduism challenges the norm and believes that it is wrong to harm animals, even if it is done humanly and the animal is to be eaten. Christianity however, teaches that all animals were put on earth by God for us to use and eat. Relevance to Australian Society This has blown out into a huge issue. A lack of meat – in particularly beef –

Read More

Peter Singer's Argument Against Animal Rights

2076 Words | 9 Pages

As humans, the reason why it is ethical to kill other species is based on protecting humans, being happy, and the fact that humans are more intelligent. When we experiment on other species we sacrifice an innocent animal to benefit humanity, yet we wouldn’t experiment on another human because it is unethical. For example, in World War II, specifically the Holocaust, people were

Read More

Eating Meat Is Ethical Essay

768 Words | 4 Pages

Alongside to the economic benefits that meat brings into our society, meat industries also help people from the lower class. Without meat industries, people from the lower class would eventually starve out as their easy and cheap access to food would be taken away from them. Simply eating small grains and vegetables would no longer provide the same amount of nutrients in their diet as previously mentioned in the paragraph above. It is for this reason that eating meat is ethical as taking it away would cause detrimental effects to our

Read More

Persuasive Essay On Eating Meat

1421 Words | 6 Pages

Eating meat is beneficial to humanity, because they provide nourishment that cannot be obtained from other sources. Without the support of animals, humans lack a distinctive diet, that is essential to their well-being. However, since animals are so important to the diet, they deserve great care and respect as well. Humans were always hunters and gathers. They always knew that meat was a big source of protein that helped keep them going(Araki).

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Killing Animals

1227 Words | 5 Pages

On the one hand, some people are favorable for killing animals. It has many opinions why they have accepted. Their reasons with cruelty make them get many benefits such as nutrient, knowledge, safety, prevention, and money. The first reason for killing animals is humans killed them for consuming such as pork made from pigs, beef made from cows, and lamp made from sheep. Human’s life exists to cause by plants and animals.

Read More

More about Why Is It Morally Permissible To Eat Under Ordinary Circumstances

Related Topics

Open Document