ipl-logo

Why Is Money Worth The Cost Of Space Exploration?

589 Words3 Pages

The money used to conduct space missions and experiments involving space has drastically increased in the past decade. Currently the requested budget of NASA’s space exploration program for 2018 is “[a]t $19.1 billion” dollars and is increasing each year (Beutel). This is not necessarily unwelcome because the more money they have means they can conduct addition missions each year and improve space exploration strategies faster. Space exploration has been a prodigious part of human history for thousands of years. Dating back to the late 1500s, Galileo Galilei studied many of the planets within our solar system. Galileo gathered data on several planets, and to this day, scientists still refer back to some of the data he collected (Dunford). The curiosity humans have to explore makes space …show more content…

Other people might say there are better ways to use the money invested in space exploration. Additionally, most people also believe the money should be used to explore our oceans, since they make up 70 percent of Earth and we have only explored five percent of all oceans (United). Also, are we benefiting from space exploration or are we losing more than we gain from it? These questions make it hard for people to believe that space exploration is worth it. Some view space exploration as a waste of resources, for example, resources used to build spaceships, and the use of natural resources to make rocket fuel. Is there a better way those resources could be used on Earth? The next problem is the future involving space technologies. Robots and artificial intelligence are becoming a large part of modern day life. People may be concerned about how space is influencing the development of technology. Questions that become prominent to space technology are, would the development of technology harm us in the future? Should space agencies be more careful with developing artificial intelligence and

Show More
Related
1086 Words | 5 Pages

In his article he takes into account that, although NASA has made many discoveries, it is still not worth the amount that we spend to produce those discoveries. Yost believes that we should be more focused on the lives of our own people, than trying to “plant flags on planets”. The money can be put into other matter such as “MIT tuition” and “feeding and clothing the homeless”, which is much more beneficial than NASA’s results. Yost believes that we need to get it out of our head that someday the earth will inevitably explode, instead we should inspire children to believe that “human life on earth is sustainable” (Yost). Although Keith Yost provides a convincing argument through his use of counter-arguments, he relies too much on pathos rather than logos to support his claims, and displays frequent use of logical fallacies, making his argument

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

Is space exploration worth the cost? John F. Kennedy and Joan Vernikos think so. In John F. Kennedy's speech “Remarks at the Dedication of the Aerospace Medical Health Center,” and in Joan Vernikos passage “Is Space Exploration worth the cost.” Medical space exploration benefits human lives is JFK’s argument and Humans for space exploration is worth the cost is Joan Vernikos argument.

Read More
529 Words | 3 Pages

Have you ever thought about space exploration? Do you think we should spend our valuable resources on it? Some people believe that we have a genetic desire to explore space. Although I believe that is false because our ancestors were doing absolutely fine without exploring space. We should not spend our valuable resources on space exploration.

Read More
876 Words | 4 Pages

29 June 2014. Author, journalist, and filmmaker, Piers Bizony in his side of the article “For and Against:Space Exploration” argues that the exploration of space is not a waste of funds,and should continue to fund it. He supports this claim by explaining the benefit of continuing to fund them and their mission. Mr.Bizony next proceeds to show they ensure not only the improvement but also the development of technology, among companies

Read More
1946 Words | 8 Pages

Thus far NASA had primarily focused on taking baby steps to achieve what they had. While these achievement seem like incredible strides in our eyes, the amount of what remains in the universe to discover is limitless. Although in an ideal world we would have the resources necessary to continue growing at the same rate as during the Space Race, the current high costs of technology had created a roadblock in space travel. Roger D. Launius claims that NASA’s large and ambitious programs failed due to technological challenges and budgetary pressures. Therefore, the question arises; do the benefits outweigh the costs?

Read More
291 Words | 2 Pages

Should we spend taxpayer money to invest in the space program? The space program is a program to pioneer the future in space exploration. The program has consumed about 18.4 billion dollars on trying to explore the barren and empty place they call space. This money that 's used on this space exploration comes from our taxpayers.

Read More
295 Words | 2 Pages

Advance Exploration Space is beautiful , but expensive to travel. In fact the government threatens to cut the space program if it does not produce. Even though NASA had success with the moon landing and sending a monkey to space, the government feels that the cost of this program is not worth what it is producing. However, sending astronauts to space is one of the best and only ways to advance space exploration.

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

People should spend money on space exploration, because humans are naturally curious and the cost for space travel is only a small fraction of the government's budget. To begin with, the cost for space exploration is only a small fraction of the government’s budget so why worry if space exploration is too expensive? As Maryanne Coronna stated in “Leaving Main Street'', “At a cost of six-tenths of a percent of the federal budget it’s well worth the price.” Nobody should be stressing about money for space exploration when the government can pay for it and still have enough money for other things like preserving Earth.

Read More
541 Words | 3 Pages

The first implication is the fate of the U.S. economy: jobs, budgets, and national relations (Source A). One misconception regarding spending taxpayer money on space exploration is that goes into space and stays there (Source H). Contrary to Source H, Source A states that this money comes back all around us. Space exploration creates jobs and salaries involving materials, building, designing, researching, and studying.

Read More
1194 Words | 5 Pages

Space has helped hone the skills of scientist. By using satellite technology for space, they were able to use the same concept for Earth. Even with all the benefits of space, its major down falls are cost, risks, and low chances of reward for their efforts. Many space explorations cost fortunes with little to come out of it, making it almost seem not worth it. The risk is another key factor, with little known about the majority of space, many outliers can appear out of nowhere and can cause death to anyone that happens to be working up there.

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

Source C informs us that six percent of federal spending is being put towards a category named “other”, which includes space exploration. This money should be focused on finding a cure for rare diseases, military costs, and mental illnesses. Source E claims we should be able to take care of people on Earth before taking on space. There are millions of people starving to death in various parts of the world, while we are consumed with the idea of finding aliens and more life to take care of in outer space. How ridiculous does this sound?

Read More
1055 Words | 5 Pages

Introduction The world has seen a lot, but space exploration has had the most significant effect on the world since sugar. The space race and things like the Sputnik change the way the world thinks. While space exploration can be very expensive, space exploration has had the greatest effect on the world because it has exponentially changed the world in education, culture, global challenges, and has created life changing innovations for many people. The thought of "discovery" and "exploration" Space exploration has been the best thing since sugar because it brought the world together.

Read More
984 Words | 4 Pages

“Hi! May I take your order, and would you like to supersize your meal today?” Every time we go through a dive thru these are the familiar words we hear through the intercom. So many times today they don't even have to ask what you would like; we already know. On average "Around 28% of Americans say they grab fast food at least once a week.

Read More
1061 Words | 5 Pages

Many people think that space exploration is a waste of money. They think that people shouldn’t be looking to the stars and that space exploration is unnecessary. Then there is the people who think otherwise. People from NASA, or people who just in general love space ,want to fund for the cause. They think that space can help the economy improve and that there is more to space than stars and a bunch of planets.

Read More
1251 Words | 6 Pages

Humans are always interested in exploring unknown, new worlds, boundaries of scientific and technical areas, and further more (Wiles). Our desire to explore and discover new things have provided benefits to our civilizations. For example, Columbus and many explorers in Age of Exploration, a period from the early 15th century to early 17th century (Sheppard), proved Aristotle’s theory that our world is round with his explorations. Also, Columbus found new continent, America. This proves that our interest could be another cause of space exploration.

Read More

More about Why Is Money Worth The Cost Of Space Exploration?

Related Topics

Open Document