ipl-logo

Why Is Mr Bennett Not Guilty For Murder

572 Words3 Pages

Dear Jury Members:Mr.Bennett should not be found not guilty of murder because reasonable doubt is found. Although the prosecution thinks that Mr.Bennet is guilty for murder, they are wrong because since Mr.Alfario is an exterminator he had access to the poison that killed Mr.Adams, Mrs.Reid thought that when Mr.Adams died that she would inherit all his wealth, and the reason Mr. Bennett had poison on his hands because he had touched the puddle of coffee while checking Mr.Adams pulse on accident. To begin, Mr Bennett is not guilty because Mr Alfario had access to the poison, the same poison that killed Mr.adams.The police found out that Mr.Adams had died from rat poisoning and a coffee cup was found by Mr.Adams’s dead body, the cup contained rat poison. …show more content…

The rat poison that was used was a poison that was only available to exterminators. Mr Alfaro is an exterminator. Miss Singleton had saw Mr.Alfaro pouring coffee for Mr.Adams 5 minutes before Mr.Adams’s death.The cause of death to Mr.Adams was a kind of rat poison only available to exterminators and Mr Alfaro was an exterminator so he had excess to the poison, in fact he was the only person at the party who could get rat poison. His fingerprints were also found on the cup showing that he had access to Mr.Adams cup at some point and Miss Singleton also saw Mr.Alfaro pouring coffee 5 for Mr.Adams right before his death proving that he did 100% have access to Mr. Adams cup that

Show More
Related
363 Words | 2 Pages

James King is one of two people being tried for the murder of Alguinaldo Nesbitt, as well as the robbery of his drugstore. He is guilty of felony murder, and there is much evidence to support this verdict. Bobo Evans, another perpetrator of this crime, “places Mr. King in the drugstore with him on the 22nd of December. This testimony was backed up by Lorelle Henry” (Myers 256-257). This is significant because Henry is a reliable witness, and she is an elderly, retired librarian with no criminal activity.

Read More
439 Words | 2 Pages

David Eldridge had wanted a raise from Mr. Armes forever and never got one, which gives him the perfect incentive to do something insane. The prosecution is correct in this case. Mr. Eldridge killed Mr. Armes because reasonable evidence exists. The strongest piece of evidence for this case to prove that David Eldridge is guilty is that he stole a spatula and never gave it back to Mr. Arms, who was killed by a spatula.

Read More
714 Words | 3 Pages

A second thing the defense might claim would be that Sheriff Heck Tate only meant to cause less harm to more people by claiming Bob Ewell had killed himself, without thorough investigation. The truth is, moreover, if Bob Ewell did not kill himself, then there is someone dangerous still lurking in the shadows of Maycomb County. A third thing the defense may say would be that there was no possible way to figure out who had killed Bob Ewell, due to the lack of light

Read More
396 Words | 2 Pages

This shows how there are other suspects in the case, so there is no defiant way to say Mr Bennet is guilty. Finally, in conclusion, Mr. Bennet is not guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams. Because reasonable doubt exists, this is because. Mr Bennet had poison on his hands from unknowingly kneeling down

Read More
637 Words | 3 Pages

David Eldridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the murder of Mr. Arms. Although the defense claims he is not guilty, he and Mr. Arms were the only ones who knew the code to the safe, they were also the only ones in the building at the time of the murder, and William Warden saw David Eldridge walk into the building before he heard Mr. Arms scream and saw his dead body. My first and strongest piece of evidence is that Mr. Arms was killed with a spatula that had David Eldridge's fingerprints on it. It has been proven that Mr. Arms' throat was slit with a metal spatula and that he bleed to death. Also, the spatula was next to Mr. Arms's body.

Read More
416 Words | 2 Pages

Dear Jury Members: Mr. Eldridge should not be found guilty of murder because there is reasonable doubt. Although the prosecution claims he is guilty, they are wrong because Barbara Wheeler had motive to murder him, for the recipe, his fingerprints were on the spatula because he took it home and cleaned it, and his footprints were not in the blood around Mr. Armes. To begin, Barbara Wheeler had a motive to murder Mr. Armes. Three days after Mr. Armes death occurred Ms. Wheeler had posted a recipe very similar to Mr. Armes. She also has admitted that she wanted to sabotage Mr. Armes restaurant, and steal his recipes.

Read More
410 Words | 2 Pages

Should someone be convicted of murder even if they did it to protect themselves and their friends or should they remain guilty? In the fictional novel The Outsiders written by S.E. Hinton there are two main rival gangs, The Socs and The Greasers. One night Johnny Cade and Ponyboy Curtis were at a park Far East and the socs came and they fought. While they were fighting Johnny took a 6 inch switchblade and stabbed Bob in the back. This resulted o in the death of Bob.

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: Mr. Bennett should be found guilty because, Mr. Adam’s cause of death was rat poisoning, and Mr. Bennett was the only person at the party with rat poison on his hands. Next, Mr. Bennett had a motive to kill Mr. Adams and had been poisoned with rat poison. Finally, Mr. Bennett would have to sell his beloved home, which had been in his family for generations, so he was desperate to kill. The first piece of evidence against Mr. Bennett had a motive to kill Mr. Adams because he owed him $250,000 and didn’t have the money to pay him back.

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

The jury’s final decision of not guilty in the case of murder in the first degree in Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose was just and a good reflection of our justice system. In act 2 page 28 Juror 8 questions if the old man that has had 2 strokes and said that heard the murder take place and the kid running down the stairs just a few seconds after he heard the body drop, could get to the door on time to see the kid running down the stairs. He argues against the validity of the old man’s testimony when he says, “His bed was at the window. It's (looking closer) twelve feet from his bed to the bedroom door. The length of the hall is forty-three feet, six inches.

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

I believe the defendant's absence of sympathy for other people and unwillingness to understand and empathize with people who are different from him led to him unconsciously setting up the circumstances for his brother to be killed. I believe that this makes him a danger to others. So, jury as you make your decision on whether or not the defendant is guilty I ask that you all seriously analyze the behaviors of Adam Armstrong and realize that they are not normal and that he needs serious help. Thank

Read More
974 Words | 4 Pages

Plus, she also tried to buy poison, but thankfully failed. Was that almost the way she was going to murder? Lizzie had an argument with her parents, just one week before the murders and chose to stay in a separate home for four days. Adding on to having an argument, just a few days before the murders, Lizzie tried to buy toxins. Although the police could not present the purchasing in the trial and the idea that all families have frenzied arguments, Lizzie definitely is guilty.

Read More
404 Words | 2 Pages

The reasons and evidence all conclude that Mr. Bennet did not murder Mr. Adams. Mr. Alfaro is an exterminator and the rat poison is only available to exterminators, Mrs. Reid thought if Mr. Adams died then she would have all the money he owned and his new mansion, and Mr. Adams could have killed himself because of his bad eyesight. I urge you to find that the defendant, Mr. Bennet, should be found not

Read More
2009 Words | 9 Pages

In this case there was no witnesses at all and the prosecution relies on assumptions rather than facts. Mrs. Wright is being accused unjustly due to prejudice and lack of investigation. When Mr. Hale went in the morning to convince Mr. Wright

Read More
548 Words | 3 Pages

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you are here because one person in this courtroom decided to take law into her own hands. The defendant, Mrs. Dominique Stephens, murdered the man that she vowed to love. This sole act by the defendant is violation of all morals and her husband’s right to live. Afterwards, she even felt guilty about this violation of justice and called the cops on herself, and she later signed a written statement stating that she is guilty of the murder of Mr. Donovan Stephens. Then the defendant later recanted this statement and said that she only killed Mr. Stephens in self defense.

Read More
851 Words | 4 Pages

The judge declares the “Murder in the first degree—premeditated homicide—is the most serious charge tried in our criminal courts. One man is dead. The life of another is at stake. If there is a reasonable doubt in your minds as to the guilt of the accused … then you must declare him not guilty. If, however, there is no reasonable doubt, then he must be found guilty.

Read More

More about Why Is Mr Bennett Not Guilty For Murder

Related Topics

Open Document