ipl-logo

Why Is Nietzsche God Is Dead

1424 Words6 Pages

“God is dead” the striking quote that alarms any reader at first grasp with such an affirmative claim. However, for Nietzsche it isn’t what first subjectively meets the eye when reading this statement, instead by this notion he means God has “ceased to be believable” (The Gay Science, section 343) and quite frankly, is unworthy of belief. Stephen Hawking proclaimed “Science makes God unnecessary”, Lawrence Krauss notes we are simplistically a universe derived from nothing and Richard Dawkins draws the correlation of God to Santa Claus based in the foundation of delusion (Pedersen.2017, Lecture Topic #10). The common dominator with these profound academics and the philosophical mindset of Nietzsche is that science undermines the ability to have …show more content…

However, for Nietzsche he thought the absorbed conception that God is dead comes with an underlining dilemma being Nihilism. This problematic occurrence is what Nietzsche identified as a will to nothingness. Theists primarily ground their lifestyle and daily habitual tasks revolving around their faith, from consistent prayer to virtuous tasks they have one common dominator acting out as God’s agents thinking in an mindset of what would God do. When you deplete and demolish God not only is faith broken but your essence as God’s supposed agent is. Hence, all the prayer all the consistent aspirations of achieving the highest form of quality of life Nirvana, the ideal afterlife collapses as result. It drains the aim, purpose and goal and fulfills ones reality with a lack of meaning. The direct correlation between God being dead and Nietzsche’s idea of Nihilism, is that due to god being dead it directly creates the dilemma that is Nihilism. Regardless if theist, or atheist either are satisfied with the harsh reality living a virtuous, pious life to result in being worm food to preserve the circle of life isn’t rewarding, merely depressing. If it all results to nothing, it molds into Nietzsche’s will of nothingness a life consumed of despair and sorrow or like previously stated in the hedonistic approach over indulging in material pursuits. This is throughly concerning considering it presupposes the question why choose one action vs the other? why act virtuous? why be kind? considering one’s autonomous decisions ultimately mean nothing. Due to Nietzsche’s predominant discussions on Nihilism people tend to reside him as being a Nihilist however, it’s quite the contrast. He wrote on the arisen conflicts that Nihilism creates for the face of humanity. He believed science didn’t need the

Show More
Related
892 Words | 4 Pages

David Tejada Mrs. Jass 4/5 CHELA 17 April 2023 Despair “It’s over. God is no longer with us.” (Wiesel 76). Elie Wiesel said this in the book Night to signify the true despair he was experiencing.

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

Scientists take the unknown and make it known. The audience will better understand the scientific method if it seems logical. Including examples of Einstein, accepting scientific theories, and designing experiments show that the basis of Barry’s argument is factual. “Einstein refused to accept his own theory until his predictions were tested,” showing even the best of the best scientists study with uncertainty. Barry’s appeal to logos helps characterize the intellectual side of science.

Read More
732 Words | 3 Pages

Death by Thomas Nagel tackles the question of death and if it is bad that it is a permanent end to our existence. Nagel states two possible positions in response to this, either death is bad because it deprives us of living life, or it is not bad because even if death is a loss then there is no subject to experience it and therefore the loss of life cannot be felt. In response to the first position Nagel argues that life is valuable in itself even if we strip it of all experience good or bad. He then argues that since a state of nonexistence is not bad by itself, it cannot be what makes death bad. He argues for this position by stating that we do not see the period before we are born as bad so why would nonexistence after life be bad?

Read More
911 Words | 4 Pages

(Solomon, Higgins, and Martin 248). Freshman Joshua Wheaton actually points this out when referring to another one of Professor’s Radisson’s scientific idols, Carter 2 Stephen Hawkings who Wheaton says stated in his writings, “Philosophy is dead” (God is Not Dead). This really is a crush to the Professor’s arguments since it is a philosophy class he is teaching. Joshua Wheaton’s defense uses many philosophical and scientific reasoning. He uses

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

There is nothing is nothing and no one to feel the loss. He goes on to explain how death is only an assumed evil because of what is denied us which is life. Nagel says that life in itself is valuable; when one takes it away good and bad all that is left over is life no matter its experiences. The benefit of life doesn’t mean survival; there is no attraction in surviving a

Read More
422 Words | 2 Pages

I believe Nietzsche to be correct in his critique in the death of God, nihilism, the master-slave morality and the will to power. Nietzsche claimed that he discovered the death of God: The idea of God has lost its full creative force, its full power, because science and technology have taken God's place in people's lives. The death of God leads to nihilism, the belief that the universe lacks meaning and purpose, and that moral, social, and political values are creative interpretations because without God, there is no objective base for values. I believe he is correct in saying that authentic faith is not possible in the modern world, and therefore God is dead. God has been killed by the belief system that reason rather than experience is the

Read More
258 Words | 2 Pages

“Only an atheist can be a good Christian; only a Christian can be a good atheist.” This quote from Ernest Bloch summarizes Friedrich Nietzsche’s parable of the madman in one sentence. If a sophomore theology major can be taken by surprise at the fact that Friedrich Nietzsche was not a Christian, this either speaks virtuously of Nietzsche’s legacy or poorly of this student’s intuition. Upon an initial personal reflection, the mindset of Nietzsche could be defended as compatible to the a-theistic pyro-theology in Peter Rollin’s book Insurrection. It is possible that my meaning gleaned from Nietzsche’s parable may not be the same as the meaning he intended.

Read More
462 Words | 2 Pages

In Nietzsche's book, he is known for referring to God as "dead". A lot of people take this statement in offense but I believe his intentions were to suggest that the love for God the country once had, was slowly diminishing into a mere spectrum of yesterdays society. Nietzsche philosophy was typically insulted or looked down upon because nobody took the time to sit and dissect what he really meant in saying "God is dead." ; although he clearly defends his statement by mentioning how Americans no longer worshipped like they once did.

Read More
2368 Words | 10 Pages

Born in Prussia, Friedrich Nietzsche grew up to be one of the most influential, controversial, interesting and intriguing philosophers of our modern time, with bold statements such as “God is dead and we killed Him,” that still resonate in society today. His work Zarathustra is best known for his controversial teaching of the Übermensch (superman or "overman"), and through this concept humanity would be able to emerge from the shadow of the dead God and take their rightful place as leaders of this society. This teaching mainly conveys the promise of a life predicated on the love of one’s self, the love of the body, and an aspiration to noble values, a continuation of a theme set by the philosophers of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. In this paper I will provide a Christian critique Friedrich Nietzsche’s claim on “God being dead,” his slave morality concept, and his idea of eternal recurrence, that are all part of

Read More
80 Words | 1 Pages

The Classical View of the hell involves the eternal suffering, meaning people will suffer forever in the afterlife if they rejected Christ. The Classical View is using eternal God and his eternal punishment for people who rejected him as main argument. On the other hand, the Annihilationist View emphasizes the suffering of people in afterlife and later will perish. The Annihilationist View bases their argument from how God is loving and would not bring even the rejecters to eternal suffering.

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

There is no teleology in Nietzsche’s philosophy – the world does not orient itself to an end, but is caught in an incessant process. The continuous “becoming” of the universe leads to nothing in the end. Because life for most of us is goal directed and future oriented, such a futile acceptance of life would be “shattering” as Nietzsche puts it. However, rather than resenting the meaningless suffering expected in our fate, Nietzsche endorses a “healthy” positive outlook, amor fati. The idea of amor fati is that in loving one’s fate, meaningless suffering is transformed into a necessary process and thus we are enabled to achieve an affirmation of life.

Read More
1876 Words | 8 Pages

Introduction: Professors Richard Dawkins and John Lennox go head to head in a battle to match their superior intellect. The debate was titled “Has Science Buried God?” Lennox also announced his new book “Gods Undertaker”. The John Lennox - Richard Dawkins Debate - bethinking.org. 2015

Read More
1502 Words | 7 Pages

Thomas Nagel is an American philosopher and professor. He wrote an argumentative essay on death that was published in the 1970’s. His main argument for the paper and his answer to that question is that death is, in fact, bad for us. He asserts his opinion on the basis that “…if death is an evil at all, it cannot be because of its positive features, but only because of what it deprives us of,” (Nagel 74). He makes it very clear the he is talking only about a permanent death, one in which there is no existence beyond death.

Read More
1695 Words | 7 Pages

In Nietzsche's philosophy of “Beyond Good and Evil” he discusses being a good person and how we can live a good life with this personality. The meaning of the good life can be referred to the sacrifice of humans, the sacrifice of human nature, and the hope we have in God. The sacrifice of humans refers to our morals. He uses selections to break down the rules of God in a simpler way. Passage 55 states, “There is a great ladder of religious cruelty with many rungs; but three of them are the most important.

Read More
1287 Words | 6 Pages

Although some passages in the second essay may point to atheism, I believe that, overall, his critique of religion seems to primarily stem from his animosity towards the way in which religious belief has manifested itself in society, rather than belief in God or religious belief as a whole. In the first essay, Nietzsche discusses the etymology of the words “good” and “bad” and how they have evolved over time to have completely different meanings, meanings that he does not agree with, due to the priestly class. Prior to this transvaluation, good meant noble and powerful while bad meant poor or common (Nietzsche, 28). The “good” were able to exercise their will to power and

Read More

More about Why Is Nietzsche God Is Dead

Related Topics

Open Document