More handpicked essays just for you.
Mind-body Dualism: A critique from a Health Perspective*
Substance dualism weaknesses
Mind-body Dualism: A critique from a Health Perspective*
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
He further to response to Princess Elisabeth question by introducing to her what is called (Cartesian Dualism) he uses these to explain to her that the mind, soul and the body are not the same and can never be same, which came to conclude that your mind cannot be your body and your body cannot be your mind. He also explains
Robert Louis Stephenson’s, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, and Shakespeare’s, Romeo and Juliet, both discuss the concept of duality as a human condition in different ways. In Stephenson’s novel, instead of masquerading through life, and suppressing himself, Jekyll chose to channel his inner rage through Mr. Hyde. Romeo and Juliet’s desperate attempt to find love and solace in each other’s arms despite what was expected of them from their families, exhibited a deviation in behavior that ultimately cost them their lives. Throughout Stephenson’s novel, the duality of human nature is portrayed through Dr. Jekyll’s creation of Mr. Hyde, which is ultimately made up of Jekyll’s evil characteristics. Jekyll states “man is not truly one,
A quote that supports duality is when Blackmon states “Two Bodies” explores several dualities at one time: the individual and the universe; man and women; reader and speaker; and even the poet and the speaker.” This means when exploring several dualities means that there are several concepts. When they are being compared it doesn’t exactly state that necessarily trying to affect the other. The quote that proves this theory from the poem is “Two bodies face to face/ are at times two stones/ and night a desert.” (4-6)
Elizabeth of Bohemia argues against Cartesian dualism by saying that humans have physical and nonphysical elements and we’re not a cogito. She says that physical things cause physical things to move, and if the mind doesn’t have a physical component then there's
Gertler’s argument defends naturalistic dualism. Naturalistic dualism is the idea that the mental state is existentially separate from the physical state. Dualism’s opposing ideology is physicalism. Physicalism is the idea that the mental and physical state are one in the same. Through this she rejects the identity theory which claims that mental states are ultimately identical to states of the brain and/or central nervous system.
In Philip K. Dick’s novel, A Scanner Darkly, he uses different objects, and the scenes will the medical officers to develop the relationship between split personalities and the self. A Scanner Darkly tells the story of an undercover cop who poses as a drug dealer but ended up becoming a drug abuser as well. Our main character, Bob Arctor (drug dealer identity) involved himself with a drug called Substance D or also known as “Slow Death”. With this drug, Bob loses his mental control because his mind is destabilizing due to the strength and the lethal qualities of this narcotic. Substance D is a mind altering drug that causes “a split between the right hemisphere and the left hemisphere...”
A behavior that is considered criminal in everyday life is drug use, but it can be encouraged throughout different group settings. Social Interactions look at how people come to abuse a drug. Sociologist view drug use as a learned behavior that people are socialized into. Drugs are most commonly encouraged by peers in settings such as school. Sociologists study the drug culture and have a theory to solve the drug problems you would need to change the drug culture in society.
Conclusion: The mind is substantively different from the body and indeed matter in general. Because in this conception the mind is substantively distinct from the body it becomes plausible for us to doubt the intuitive connection between mind and body. Indeed there are many aspects of the external world that do not appear to have minds and yet appear none the less real in spite of this for example mountains, sticks or lamps, given this we can begin to rationalize that perhaps minds can exist without bodies, and we only lack the capacity to perceive them.
The term substance abuse is predominately used to signify an unhealthy and devitalizing obsession on a mind-altering chemical substance. In addition, it is most often used to refer to illegal drugs as well as legal, regulated substances such as prescription medications and alcohol. Drug abuse is usually considered a punishable offence by many countries and is also regarded as being personally and socially detrimental. Three major sociological paradigms including functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism delve in to the world of addiction as well as the controversies that surround this social issue.
His argument criticizes physicalism; he claims that even if all physical knowledge is explained or known, there is still the question of experience. Jackson refers to these subjective, non-physical properties—experience—as qualia (Jackson). Qualia must be the consequence of the physical processes that Mary studied in Jackson’s knowledge argument. Jackson’s argument solely concludes that non-physical properties exist, but he does not argue how qualia affect the physical world (Jackson). There are two views that a property dualist can take from Jackson’s conclusions: qualia come from physical processes and can have an effect on the physical world or that qualia are a result of physical processes but do not affect the physical world.
Knowledge Argument against Physicalism Physicalism is a branch of philosophy which states that everything in this world is physical. There is nothing like non-physical. Physical facts are the truth in this world. Physicalism is also called ‘materialistic monism’. Monism is a singular existence theory like only one substance exists in the world.
I think that dualism is the correct view of the human experience, but there are flaws in the argument. Firstly, my views are biased to my spiritual beliefs. Also, I do not one hundred percent believe that I right. In regards to issues of biology and technology, there are definitely some holes in the dualism argument. When I think about the mind, I think of the ability to have nonlinear thoughts.
Firstly, it is like-minded with knowledge of humans and brains. Secondly, it accounts for the close relation we think there is between mind and body. When we talk about how a person thinks or believes, we are talking about how a human behaves. Thirdly, it is a monistic theory removing mental substance, which makes it an acceptable theory for materialists.
This paper will critically examine the Cartesian dualist position and the notion that it can offer a plausible account of the mind and body. Proposed criticisms deal with both the logical and empirical conceivability of dualist assertions, their incompatibility with physical truths, and the reducibility of the position to absurdity. Cartesian Dualism, or substance dualism, is a metaphysical position which maintains that the mind and body consist in two separate and ontologically distinct substances. On this view, the mind is understood to be an essentially thinking substance with no spatial extension; whereas the body is a physical, non-thinking substance extended in space. Though they share no common properties, substance dualists maintain
An issue in theoretical basis on what should prevail or which is supreme between International Law or Municipal Law (national law) is usually presented as a competition between monism and dualist. But in modern approach there is now the theory of coordination or is also called Harmonization theory that rejects the presumption of the other two theoretical concept, monism and dualism. The monist view asserts the international law’s supremacy over the municipal law even in matters within the internal or domestic jurisdiction of a state. While it is true that the international law defines the legal existence of states as well of the validity of its national legal order, the dualist asserts the international law is an existing system that is completely separated from municipal or national law. That dictates the
