ipl-logo

Why Queenie Is Lying

236 Words1 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: English essay on drinking & driving

I believe that Queenie is lying for the following reasons. We arrived at the Volupides home at 1:30 and there was a dead body laying there on the floor upside-down with an unbroken glass in his hand. The wife said she and the husband had a fight and she left for the club. She invited many friends over to her house and she arrived 10 minutes before her friends got there. When they did the autopsy, they found out that he was under the influence alcohol. However, they found a head wound. To begin with I think that Queenie is guilty because she went home ten minutes before her friends got there which is enough time to kill her husband so she would have witnesses to make it look like it was an accident.As a rule when people kill someone and have
Show More
Related
509 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore, making her claim to the heart being possibly connected to her husband after being removed from the body is

Read More
156 Words | 1 Pages

Even if she wasn’t seen killing her husband in the beginning, in the eyes of the law, the evidence showed she did. So killing her husband in the end is the same crime. Simple, yeah?

Read More
1783 Words | 8 Pages

When asking her daughter, Casey, where Caylee was she made many different excuses before finally admitting that she had not seen Caylee in weeks. Police suspected that Casey was responsible for the death of Caylee and after an investigation, Casey was charged

Read More
1233 Words | 5 Pages

They couldn’t comprehend that a mother would kill her own child by stuffing her in a case then disposing of her in the wild.  When Lindy was found guilty and jailed, the majority of the public were enthralled with the fact that this murderer was getting punished for her terrible actions but didn’t think that it was enough justice for the barbaric act she performed.  Case Up-To-Date  A royal commission then found the Chamberlains not guilty on June 12, 2012 - 32 years after Azaria's disappearance.

Read More
257 Words | 2 Pages

At the trial, Steven pleaded not guilty for the entire thing, but there were three pieces of evidence securing the conviction. The first piece of evidence, was that Lynne died before 7:45 p.m. This was crucial because Truscott was back on the school grounds at 8pm, so if Harper had died past 8pm, Truscott would have had alibi. Although this evidence was backed up by Dr. Penistan, who had performed Harper's autopsy, and stated that based on the contents of Lynne's stomach, he believed that she died before 7:45 p.m. on the night she disappeared. Even though there were two prior possibilities as to when Harper had died, that would have proven Truscott innocent, the court still accepted this because there was more evidence to consider. The second

Read More
686 Words | 3 Pages

(Australasian Legal Information Institute, 2013) At the time of Lisa Harnum's death, she and the accused were engaged and living together in an apartment on the 15th floor. Miss Harnum fell off the balcony of her apartment to her death. The main issue in the trial was whether her death was the doing of the accused. The Crown claims that the accused purposefully lifted Miss Harnum and threw her over the balcony however the accused says that she either slipped or allowed herself to fall off the balcony of her own consensus.

Read More
1531 Words | 7 Pages

Primarily, apart from the previously discussed issues regarding the evidence and technology used, the issues consisted of the fact that there was no body ever found, making it difficult to examine the exact circumstances of the crime and whether the crime occurred entirely, relying on a few bloodstains and unclear CCTV footage (as seen in Figure 3). In relation to this issue, another problem was the previously aforementioned heavy reliance on the eyewitness testimony of Joanne Lees. While crucial to the investigation, eyewitness testimonies may be subject to inconsistencies, memory lapses and potential bias, all of which were concerns during the trial. Finally, the high-profile nature of the case garnered widespread media attention. The extensive media coverage had the potential to influence public opinions which in turn may have impacted the trial

Read More
418 Words | 2 Pages

She was making up lies so, no one would find out what she have done that one night when she drank the blood. So, by her doing that makes me think that she

Read More
416 Words | 2 Pages

Not calling 911 and hiding the body was morally and criminally wrong. The lack of remorse bothered me as an utter disregard for her dead daughter and selfishness unparalleled. I believe that the prosecution’s putting the death

Read More
1074 Words | 5 Pages

She states, "I cannot lie, John. I cannot lie. " Risking her own execution along with her husband’s execution to stay true to what she

Read More
452 Words | 2 Pages

The opposing side of the argument may say Mary planned on the death of her husband though evidence says otherwise. When Mary went down to the freezer she “took hold of the first object she found” displaying how Mary didn’t deliberately grab a weapon to use on Patrick’s death and his actual killing was not clearly thought-out by Mary, proving diminished capacity and not murder. Mary Maloney deeply loved her husband and her child, through Patricks’ violence push her to her limits. No criminal intent was for sought when Mary’s state of mind obscurely went after Patrick. All in all Mary wasn’t in her right mind whyen all of this took place.

Read More
853 Words | 4 Pages

“But the evidence will show he directed her off the highway to a dark, secluded where he strangled her with a rope and threw her body off a bridge.” Desloup stated (pg 1). As stated in the case, the murder weapon was a rope, as she died because of strangulation. After the murder,

Read More
866 Words | 4 Pages

No medical evidence was ever collected or shown to prove that the crime ever took place. On the night after the assault, Mayella Ewell was never seen be a doctor. She was never examined to prove that Tom Robinson did anything to her. Mayella stated that she was beaten that night, so she should have gone to the doctor to get checked out. There is no proof of any crime, so there should not have been a guilty verdict.

Read More
850 Words | 4 Pages

They couldn’t prove it now. They can’t talk to my secretary because she is dead” (Black Dahlia). With all this evidence pertaining to Dr. George Hodel it’s easy to see why some people say he was the killer. To sum up people believed that George Hodel used his medical experience to kill and dissect her and left her for dead, then other people believed he killed more people and decompose them in his

Read More
1143 Words | 5 Pages

First, let’s start with the prosecution witnesses. They called a neighbor, police officer, and professional psychiatrist. The neighbor was called to attest to Mary’s character and party life style. It helped show that she made bad decisions and had poor judgment at times, but it does not equate to murder. Not everyone who drinks kills their baby.

Read More

More about Why Queenie Is Lying

Related Topics

Open Document