ipl-logo

Are Eugenics Good Or Bad

1180 Words5 Pages

Eugenics is Evil

Eugenics was originated in the late nineteenth century. At first, eugenics was designed to prevent the biological degradation and to eliminate the competition for survival. However, after it was widely spread to the Western countries, it was then disused by some scientist to create a better individual. Afterwards, the Nazi Germany aggressively promoted the application of eugenic which forced around 13 millions of people undergone the surgery of sterilization. It was finally evolved into the massacre of illness and disables.This event shocked the whole world. Nowadays, eugenics still a controversial topic around the world. In my opinion, I disagree that eugenics should be used to improve the human genetic traits of a society. …show more content…

Firstly, eugenics violates humanity and kills human diversity. Eugenics allow the engineering of the genetic material of a fetus to prevent negative heredity thus the health condition of the child can be improved. Yet, some scientists use eugenics as a tool try to change the genetic makeup, for instance, the skin color, IQ, blood type etc. in order to create a better person and fulfill the need of the society. Once the fetus was checked illness or disable, it was then immediately killed. It violates the humanity and also can be seen as a discrimination of humankind. With the times pass by, there will be more and more intelligent people but the diversity of human will be deceased. Human diversity was created by the mutation of a gene, with this, everyone so to become unique and irreplaceable. Furthermore, human diversity plays a vital role in human for adapting and survival to an environment If eugenics is applied to the society, people will not be able to handle situation out of the blue. More and more people with the same gene will produce by selective engineering and thus the diversity of humankind keep going down, one day, humankind may become …show more content…

With the technology advances, preimplantation genetic diagnosis is now available for selecting the best gene and pass to the next generation. Consequently, with the born of large amount intelligent people, all the bad behaviors and criminals such as theft and sexual offense, can be prevented. The application of eugenics help to develop a smarter, more gorgeous, all-around person which can absolutely become a successful person and contribute to the society. Eugenic will make everyone in the society maintain a high level of manne and quality as all of them were

Show More
Related
928 Words | 4 Pages

After the fall of the Nazis in the 1940s, eugenics continued to impact the lives of those in the United States negatively up until the 1970s. It was not due to the need to be “superior”, but to be able to control reproduction by increasing the top members and decreasing the lower members. The movement took place mainly in the East Coast during the Progressive Era, reaching its climax in the 1920s and 1930s with immigration control, marriage laws, and sterilization of those who were considered dangerous to the society. Due to the Nazis, their rise to power, and the horrifying Holocaust, it had formed the movements in the United States.

Read More
151 Words | 1 Pages

I agree with your point that we shouldn 't have the authority to take away anyone 's right to bear children but sterilization is not inhumane if someone chooses to do it for their own personal reasons. I myself, after bearing 3 children, made the personal decision to not have anymore. There was nothing inhumane about my decision or the procedure. I do agree however that the inhumane practice of forced or "coercive" sterilization, favored by eugenicists and population controllers was wrong. Much of the controversy over Sanger and her involvement with eugenics came from a letter she wrote and an inartfully written sentence that describes the sort of allegations that fueled people 's suspicions that she was opening clinics to exterminate a

Read More
698 Words | 3 Pages

The Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering also show that genetic engineering can lead to overpopulation and wars. First of all, in Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut Jr., everyone is the same and they have strict laws. In Harrison Bergeron, people are made to be the same by putting weights on strong people, making beautiful people wear ugly masks, and hindering smart people’s thoughts. In Jonas’ community, there is Sameness, which is making everything the

Read More
771 Words | 4 Pages

Eugenics is not a thought of morale and is not designed to save the entire human race, just the upper socioeconomic class. In North Carolina, feeble minded individuals were used as subjects for all kinds of genocidal experiments. Feeble minded simply means someone who suffers from an illness or mental deficiency and are often easier persuaded because they think they are getting help when they were really being coerced into becoming a test

Read More
821 Words | 4 Pages

Still, the idea was formed to rid the human population of deaf people by sterilizing them, which is founded in eugenics. Eugenics is the study or belief that a way to improve the quality of the human population is by discouraging reproduction of people who have genetic defects. Thus, a person presumed to have genetic defects is discouraged to reproduce, and someone without genetic defects would be encouraged to reproduce. The story in the movie relating how one deaf couple had a still-born baby. After the infant was delivered the doctor sterilized the woman without her consent.

Read More
782 Words | 4 Pages

The war and immigration played the largest role on the emergence of eugenics. In 1927, the supreme court ruled in favor of the sexual sterilization of a young woman named Carrie Buck. This paper discusses

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

In 1917, a law was passed creating the Oregon State Board of Eugenics. Eugenics is the concept of promoting people with sought after physical and mental traits to reproduce in order to enhance society. The board was allowed to sterilize inmates and patients in prisons and mental institutions, and if they could not reproduce, the thought was it would improve society. However, in 1983 the law was abolished. Sterilizing people does not stop the following generation from having physical or mental abnormalities nor does it prevent crime, using genetics to predict the mental state of future generations is not logical, and the sterilizations were unfair and inhumane.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

“They (eugenicists) believe that human beings are inherently no different than animals, and therefore we can and should be bred like animals.” Eugenicists think that since we humans and animals are both mammals, that we can both endure the same dangerous tests. The results will be different for different animals and humans. It is true that the human race is animals, but in no way should we be treated as animals. Eugenicists use the same tests that are used on cows for testing as they do for humans.

Read More
1622 Words | 7 Pages

According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, eugenics is: “a science that deals with the improvement (as by control of human mating) of hereditary qualities of a race or breed”. ("Definition of Eugenics by Merriam-Webster") The most common example of this concept would be the Holocaust, which was the extermination of Jewish people and others deemed “unfit” for society in World War Ⅱ. But little do many know, the Nazi’s were not the only people practicing eugenics in the early 1900’s, eugenics was being practiced in the United States long before the Holocaust. The American Eugenics Society aimed to educate American people on the science of Eugenics.

Read More
1182 Words | 5 Pages

The impact of the inauguration of scientific beliefs and studies on eugenics in the 1800’s is still evident in modern United States today. Eugenics is defined as eugenicists promoting the naturally fit people who carried desirable traits to increase a population with hopes of a community filled with intelligent citizens. Positive eugenics advocated the superior people to marry each other and reproduce to create as many offsprings in order to increase the number of the fit. Negative eugenics would discourage the disabled from reproducing at all, so that they would not compete with the superior. The endorsement from the government allowed scientists to implement their ideas on eugenics and some aspect of their policies is used today.

Read More
2065 Words | 9 Pages

Eugenics or “good breeding” is meant to improve the human race through the gene pool using various methods. Similar to designer babies, the process could be used for good, but like Colin Tudge points out, “…although guns and bombs can be used as agents of peace, [humans] should not be overly surprised when in practice they are used to make war” (Tudge 282). Eugenics can be performed simply by regulating who and who cannot mate. It can also be done by sterilization, a procedure that permanently blocks pregnancy in a woman, which was a reality for many. The most famous account was performed by Germany, specifically the Nazis, during WWII, when 400,000 women were sterilized (Tudge 284).

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

This can lead to genetic defects, it limits genetic diversity, and it can be taken to very extreme levels. ` To start us off, genetically engineering a baby can be very unsafe for it and lead to genetic defects. Scientists don’t know everything about the human body yet, and because of this, if we end up modifying something, it could end up affecting something important that we didn’t know about. We also can’t predict the outcome of the modification yet. Scientists could be able to possibly knock out a disease out of our genetic code, but since we don’t

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

Though eugenics may begin with good intentions, through events such as The Holocaust, one can see how quickly the good intentions can be twisted and turned into something vile and inhumane. It really boils down to the fact that yes, the human race is imperfect. But in that imperfection beauty is found in the diversity as well as progress. If humans were all perfect specimens, there would be no reason to dream or hope for a better tomorrow. The dreamers are the ones who advance society and always have been.

Read More
1229 Words | 5 Pages

Eugenics could make the human race more tough in terms of surviving epidemics or apocalyptic conditions which could wipe us off the face of the Earth as it is an attempt to improve the human gene pool .It could get rid of genetic diseases(from common ones like type 1 diabetes to severe ones like cystic fibrosis) which cause grief to family members, reduce quality of life and costs a lot of maintain life or treat, furthermore it could greatly increase our lifespan which is all good individually but it may have consequences as a species since competition for already scarce resources may increase if the birth rate is not controlled (is that ethical as well?), overpopulation could cause a greater anthropogenic pollution of the Earth leading to our doom which started off as a way to improve our lifestyle could lead to more industry to support the higher population leading to larger ozone holes more melting of polar icecaps and higher rising of sea levels and more cases of skin cancer. We would be playing god, altering a sort of natural cycle which regulates the population or cause a frenzy where everyone wants perfection where there could be discrimination where people can’t afford or are in no situation to receive the advantages of eugenics. In this case we should make eugenics widely and cheaply available but a question arises whether that is practically possible. Therefore eugenics also touches on other controversial topics like IVF, PID an

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

Also, there is an universal law to this theory which states that one's actions are based on maxims only that would be accepted as universal law and that the principle of any action should be applicable in any situation. Thus, in this case the use of eugenics to improve the future generations of the human race, notwithstanding the outcome, was ethically incorrect as the decision to breach the rights of other individuals is universally considered to be immoral. Although from the perspective from an utilitarian, this decision based on eugenics can be seen much differently. The principle of utilitarianism states that: if an action aims at bringing about happiness for a maximum amount of people, then the action can be considered to be correct.

Read More

More about Are Eugenics Good Or Bad

Related Topics

Open Document