ipl-logo

Why Should Prisoner B 3087 Be Banned

670 Words3 Pages

Prisoner B-3087 is a great way to expose younger generations to the truth about an important event that changed history. A controversial argument has emerged about whether Prisoner B-3087 should be banned. There are many reasons why this book should not be banned, such as the fact that it’s meant for kids and helps educate them about real-life events. Another reason is because it’s spreading the story of someone’s experience in the Holocaust and what they went through. While there are a few reasons why people might think this book should be banned, such as the fact that it might be too violent or gruesome, there are some facts that justify this. While writing Prisoner B-3087, author Alan Gratz kept in mind that he was writing this book for kids of a younger age. A blog on …show more content…

Taking out details to make it seem less vulgar is just like ignoring a part of our history that needs to be learned from. On the other hand, some will say that this topic is extremely violent and should not be introduced to kids at such an early age. A source states that, “In addition to educational appropriateness and obscenity, valid legal reasons to ban books from public school libraries can include content that is considered defamatory, engenders hatred, or incites violence. For instance, a school book that contains hate speech or promotes violence against specific groups can be deemed inappropriate for school settings.” Prisoner B-3087 can seem a bit violent at times, which makes it understandable that some parents agree that this book should be banned. Especially according to the law and the First Amendment, this book does break some of these terms and is on the explicit side of reading material. Thus, it is reasonable to say that many wouldn’t want books like these in their school’s libraries. In conclusion, Prisoner B-3087 is an amazing way to expose kids to an event that changed

Show More
Related
691 Words | 3 Pages

the content of the non-fiction novel, which detail the brutal murder of a prosperous Kansas farmer and his family are apparently too macabre for some…” (latimes.com). In Savannah, Georgia parents also were the cause for the book to be banned in an English Advanced Placement class, “... a parent complained that it contained sex, violence, and profanity” (weebly.com). This book was mainly challenged by parents because they believed their children were not yet mature enough to handle the book’s

Read More
423 Words | 2 Pages

Blei’s argument, as to why banning the book is counter productive, is very insightful. While other critics argue that the profanities in the book should be ignored when considering banning the book, Blei accepts the profanities and points out that there are a multitude of other ways for kids to be exposed to such things in their

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

The idea to ban the book came about when students were asked to read it in school. Parents of the students reported, as said before, the book contained explicit language, references to child molestation, adolescent sexual exploits, and violence relating to the abusive father (“Banned Book Awareness”). High school parents began to challenge the book in 2010 at, William S. Hart Union High School District in Saugus (in California), and Sade-Central City High School. Successes in getting it banned took place in both Texas and Michigan. A parent at Traverse Public Schools said “It’s just really inappropriate for 13- and 14-year-olds” (“Banned Book

Read More
1033 Words | 5 Pages

The lack of counter arguments does not constitute a problem; rather, it creates an effect of harmony of the universal disapproval of crimes against humanity. The poem “Treblinka Gas Chamber” by Phyllis Webb is a snapshot of the horrors of genocide of Jewish people in Nazi Germany, describing children’s experiences to evoke a stronger emotional reaction. Similarly, the TRC’s “The History” explores the cultural genocide of Indigenous people in Canada as well as the barbaric treatment of children from the ‘superior’ race.

Read More
826 Words | 4 Pages

the book had way too much and it was way too mature and had lot’s of sexual context. I feel as if the books with mature language and racism are eye opening for kids and the books are a great example to show the kids. All kids have to take a health class and they learn about sex so what’s the difference?Kids have to grow up and mature at some point of time and if they see stuff like that in their local school library maybe they would seek awareness. This is not reasonable because what about the kids that are black, asian, chinese etc.. It may show awareness to the kids that white but to kids like them it seems wrong and unfair that racism is being displayed in their school and it could be discouraging.

Read More
682 Words | 3 Pages

This book does not desensitize people to violence as it constantly shows mourning towards the characters and empathy for what they have experienced. People have chosen to ban this book because they didn’t like the reality of it being bestowed upon children but that’s exactly why it should not be banned. This account states“to bring publishing under government control by creating a number of official censors to whom authors would submit their work for approval prior to publication. Milton argued that pre-censorship of authors was little more than an excuse for state control of thought.” (“Banning Books: Overview”)

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

She rallies to critically analyze why one may be inclined to censor a topic for a group, and what that means for those impacted. Combining both sources reveals a consensus: limiting public access to information on any subject can have serious impacts on a person’s intellectual and emotional development, which impacts how they relate to the rest of society. Timothy Inklebarger succinctly introduces book bans across America, specifically in prisons, in his functional retrospective Restricting Books Behind Bars, published by the American Library Association. The work was prompted by the recent New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision decision to limit books imported into prisons only to specific vendors. Many protested the change, largely due to the fact the suppliers nearly exclusively stocked crosswords and coloring books.

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

What they did was put it in the library instead of teaching it in the curriculum. Yes the book might be appropriate for some children, but for others it might be too intense. So putting it in the library lets you decide whether you are ready for the book, if not don 't read it. Like where it says in paragraph 3 of the article where it says, “It’s still in our library”. The school leader in Biloxi thought that the morals taught from the book “to Kill a Mockingbird” could be replicated in a less offensive form through another book.

Read More
768 Words | 4 Pages

Just because a book that was written many decades ago may have bad words in it, doesn’t mean that it should be withheld from the students. Additionally, the educational value of, The Catcher in the Rye would be totally lost if a book is banned just for containing “explicit” language. Sophomore students are at the age where they are old enough to know what is appropriate and what isn’t and they can read a book that has bad words in it. If a book is banned because of its explicit content, that overshadows the educational content and the moral lessons that the reader would take away from reading this book.

Read More
507 Words | 3 Pages

People wanting to censor books must follow a set of rules. First, they must provide evidence on why they believe this book should be censored. They should have a reason on why the particular novel has a dangerous effect on the youth. Second, they must provide psychological evidence that shows how reading a potential dangerous book could inspire students to flagrantly disregard authority. Although opinion is usually taken from people who frequently read, the issue of censorship should be taken into account from all

Read More
1027 Words | 5 Pages

While people may agree with this idea, others believe that rather than teaching lessons, books can contaminate kids’ minds with offensive ideas. This is not necessarily true, because all stories teach some kind of lesson. The profanity and vulgarity in a text may be used to convey an important message. It is up to the reader himself or herself what they want to take away from a book. All in all, censorship of books should not be allowed because many

Read More
969 Words | 4 Pages

Although, not all books and novels belong in the school environment, the great, historic novels such as, Lord of the Flies by William Golding that are banned frequently should not be censored by school officials, board members, etc. Most of the novels that appear on ALA’s banned book list are historic novels with very deep, emotional themes behind them that students should learn to read and recognize. No one in today’s world is living in a fairy land, and historic novels with offensive content with good meanings should be taught to kids. Lord of the Flies has been banned by districts across the country mainly because of the excessive violence and lack of morality of the boys. Although there is a lot of offensive violence in the novel, the main outline of the story is that all men possess the capability of evil doing.

Read More
1071 Words | 5 Pages

“Using profanity was against school policy and having the book in the library made newly elected school board member, Larry McDonald, feel uncomfortable.”

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

Also, some say that you should not be exposing bad behavior or language to students but in reality they hear and see these things everyday, and by banning a book, that is not protecting them. Writers have the freedom to write whatever they want and that is a part of the First Amendment, so why banned their book? “The First Amendment allows individuals to speak, publish, read and view what they wish, worship (or not worship) as they wish, associate with

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

Also, some say that you should not be exposing bad behavior or language to students but in reality they hear and see these things everyday, and by banning a book, that is not protecting them. Writers have the freedom to write whatever they want and that is a part of the First Amendment, so why banned their book? “The First Amendment allows individuals to speak, publish, read and view what they wish, worship (or not worship) as they wish, associate with

Read More

More about Why Should Prisoner B 3087 Be Banned

Open Document