Prisoner B-3087 is a great way to expose younger generations to the truth about an important event that changed history. A controversial argument has emerged about whether Prisoner B-3087 should be banned. There are many reasons why this book should not be banned, such as the fact that it’s meant for kids and helps educate them about real-life events. Another reason is because it’s spreading the story of someone’s experience in the Holocaust and what they went through. While there are a few reasons why people might think this book should be banned, such as the fact that it might be too violent or gruesome, there are some facts that justify this. While writing Prisoner B-3087, author Alan Gratz kept in mind that he was writing this book for kids of a younger age. A blog on …show more content…
Taking out details to make it seem less vulgar is just like ignoring a part of our history that needs to be learned from. On the other hand, some will say that this topic is extremely violent and should not be introduced to kids at such an early age. A source states that, “In addition to educational appropriateness and obscenity, valid legal reasons to ban books from public school libraries can include content that is considered defamatory, engenders hatred, or incites violence. For instance, a school book that contains hate speech or promotes violence against specific groups can be deemed inappropriate for school settings.” Prisoner B-3087 can seem a bit violent at times, which makes it understandable that some parents agree that this book should be banned. Especially according to the law and the First Amendment, this book does break some of these terms and is on the explicit side of reading material. Thus, it is reasonable to say that many wouldn’t want books like these in their school’s libraries. In conclusion, Prisoner B-3087 is an amazing way to expose kids to an event that changed