Why The Stanford Prison Experiment Was Conducted By Philip Zimbardo

In 1971 Philip Zambardo conducted an experiment in the basement of the Psycoigy department at the Stanford Univisty with a team of Psycogy students to see how normal people act in a prison inverment as a guard and or a prisoner. He wanted to see how theses men will adapt in this everment and it was to go on for 2 weeks but got cut short to 6 day for Psyogicl dmage that could of occerd if he keeped the experiment going any longer. Philip learned a lot with this experiment as did society did now to make it a forbitting exerment now. Phillip lreaned how people act in there fack roles and how far people will go when they have the power of a lab coat behinf them.

The Stanford Prison Experiment was Conducted by Philip Zimbardo and wanted to see the

Phillip wrote in his notes about how bad it was getting when he said this, “While I was doing this one of the guards lined up all of the prisoners(65)and had them Sound 11: "819" chant chant aloud. l. As soon as I realized that #819 was hearing all this, I raced into the room where I had left him, and what I found (66)was a boy crying hysterically while in the background his fellow prisoners were yelling and chanting that he was a bad prisoner, that they were being punished because of him.” ( Philip Zimbardo Greg White, 1971, p.12). That was one of many factors of why Phillip had to put a halt to the experiment because it was getting so out of control. One of the guards noticed "After the first day I noticed nothing was happening. It was a bit of a bore, so I made the decision I would take on the persona of a very cruel prison guard," said Dave Eshleman, one of the wardens who took a lead role (Alastair Leithead , BBC News, 2011). There was a guard they called John Wayne that said in an interview with BBC "It was rapidly spiralling out of control," said prison guard Mr Eshleman who hid behind his mirrored sunglasses and a southern US accent."I kept looking for the limits - at what point would they stop me and say 'No, this is only an experiment and I have had

He was the superintend which made him a big part of the experiment and he even said that he was too involved in the experiment and acting more as the superintendent rather than the experiment conductor (Ken Musen, Philip Zimbardo, 1992).

In 1973 Professor Zimbardo asked the American Psychological Association to conduct an ethics evaluation, and the APA concluded that all existing ethical guidelines had been followed (Jeff Breil, Scott Plous, and David Jensenius.2015). Philip did follow the guideline at that time but he did also pressure and influence them to stay when they wanted to leave.

Society can learn a lot form this experiment that is why the study was funded a government grant from the U.S. Office of Naval Research to study antisocial behavior(Jeff Breil, Scott Plous, and David Jensenius.2015). Society can also learn how people act when they get a role and how long it takes for them to start acting in that role and how far people will go with that role. One of the gaurds said after in an interview with BBC that "I kept looking for the limits - at what point would they stop me and say 'No, this is only an experiment and I have had enough', but I don't think I ever reached that point." (Leithead, 2011). In a couple of days the man felt like he could push the limits of his role and wait for someone to tell him to stop