ipl-logo

Why Was Andrew Jackson A Good King

515 Words3 Pages

Andrew Jackson was more of a king for several reasons. First, the Indian removal act, because he went against the supreme court's ruling. Second, the Spoils System, how we went against congress and still with drawed the federal funds from the treasury. Finally, the Nullification Crisis and Compromise, the way he did not want the states to have the same type of power as the government. First, The indian removal act was to move the indian tribes that were occupying land onto western reservations. The indian tribes tried to go to court to fight against the act using the government. The supreme court agreed with the indians, that they did not have to move, but President Jackson made them move anyway because he believed that the supreme court could not support its ruling. President Jackson went against the Supreme Court so that he could sell the land for more money after the indians were relocated. The evidence in this paragraph was taken from the document “President Jackson and Indian Removal.” Secondly, the Spoils System was about President Jackson’s “Pet Banks” and going against Congress to take the federal funds out of the treasury. President Jackson did not like the national banks system …show more content…

The Nullification act was passed to help the states decide if the laws made by the government were constitutional and if they needed to follow them. If the law was found unconstitutional by the state or if it “hurt” the state in an way, the state could nullify it. This shows that he feared the states having equal power to the government and country as a whole, because if he passed a law that was truly unconstitutional, then the states would not have to follow it. In result to this, the compromise of 1833 was created. “Jackson’s Economic Issues” was the document used for the information of this

Show More
Related
491 Words | 2 Pages

This leads to the topic, why did Jackson want to destroy the bank? Well first I need to tell you what the second bank was and what kind of roles it played in the economy. They had the power to act exclusively as the federal government's financial agents. The bank did many other things like half federal deposits, made transfers to federal funds between states, and dealt with payments or receipts involving the federal government.

Read More
323 Words | 2 Pages

While Andrew Jackson was President, he acted more like a king than a President. The following essay will support 3 of his actions the Spoils system, that jackson did proving he wanted total authority. Another one is the Indian Removal Act in which Jackson wanted all the Indians to move from one place to another. The last one is the Removal of Deposits.

Read More
327 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Jackson was president starting in 1824 and while he was in office, people had many different views on him. One of those views was that he exercised power as a total and absolute monarch. He was even given the nickname of “King Andrew the First.” Jackson should be viewed as an absolute monarch because instead of electing his cabinet, he appointed them, giving positions to his supporters. He also fired his whole cabinet, which only made people happy to see him as a tyrant.

Read More
170 Words | 1 Pages

The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove

Read More
417 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Jackson presidency focused a lot on small government and pleasing the common man. He attempted to shut down national banks to make government smaller. Jackson also enforces things like the Indian Removal Policy, which strengthened the bond between Jackson and the common man. Jackson was the first and only president to make the country debt too. All of these impacted are government today very much as well as other governments around the world.

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

Andrew Jackson was not a successful President. Many of his policies were selfish. For example, so me of his monetary policies led to the Panic of 1837. He also ended the Bank of the United States. He took the money form the Bank of the United States and put it into “pet banks”, which contributed to the Panic of 1837.

Read More
613 Words | 3 Pages

Andrew jackson was a important cotributor and one of the most influential presidents to ever serve the country. He took on the countries domestic issues and used his executive power far to its extent. Jackson effectivly evicted the native americans which stopped the conflict between the colonists. He vetoed the second bank of america, terminating the recharter bill from ever becoming a law. Also, he avoided south carolina’s seceding from the union.

Read More
170 Words | 1 Pages

Although Andrew Jackson had many faults, here are some acts that were not fully inadequate. Firstly, he vetoed the Second Bank of the United States, which was believed to have too much power and was unfairly benefiting the wealthy at the expense of ordinary citizens. He also modernized the navy and strengthened the military, which helped the United States defend itself against foreign threats and was a strong advocate for the Union. These things can be seen as favorable to the “common folk” but some of his acts were at the expense of others. For example, Jackson supported states rights to appeal to the people, but he drew the line at nullification where states have the right to veto a law they don't see fit within their boundaries, which also

Read More
1001 Words | 5 Pages

Jackson believed that the bank was an unjust way for the federal government to have complete control over the American money supply. Because of his conservative opinions, which made him want to limit the power of the federal government, Jackson did not agree with the government having this amount of power, causing him to join several groups made up of bank critics that shared his same opinions. In his attempt to sustain the National Bank system, Jackson vetoed many bills that were created in order to give the government more power of the people’s money. His vetoes pleased many Americans as America was largely made up of conservative people in this era. Jackson knew that if he could “kill” the National Bank, it would leave the power of banking in the hands of the state governments, effectively increasing the amount of influence the people of each state had on their

Read More
569 Words | 3 Pages

Plus, Indians were not much a problem; the whites just saw them as aliens since they had a different skin color. Jackson has been devoting several paragraphs to the policy, but he never said the policy by the name Indian Removal Act. Is he trying to hide it for some reason? Why not say it by name, it was the first policy he made. His VERY first action as president, he called for a passage of a Removal act that would forcefully remove the Native Americans’.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

Andrew Jackson is a villain as president because he was arrogant and thought he was never wrong. He also eliminated the National bank and tried to get rid of the electoral college. Speaking on wrong doing he also was the main cause of the Native Americans suffering. Andrew Jackson was arrogant because he made many corrupt decisions that affected himself, America and his peers. Like how threatened to hang Vice president John C .

Read More
790 Words | 4 Pages

In conclusion, there is much evidence to support the idea that Andrew Jackson was a tyrant and vastly abused his power in presidency. Jackson was a cruel ruler for his actions, some including the Indian Removal Act, his overuse of vetoing, and his temper and personality. Overall he was just not right for the position of a political

Read More
351 Words | 2 Pages

In my opinion, Andrew jackson was a bad President because he wasn’t wise and didn’t know how to lead the U.S. Not only did he not know how to be a leader, but he was also unfair to his people, made bad decisions in life and in governing, and hurt many people. One reason Jackson was a bad President was because he gave government jobs to only his friends and people that were on his side and supported him, this was called the Spoil System according to many of the citizens that lived in America. If someone wanted to be Senate or Vice President and they weren’t on Jackson’s side, they would not get the job because Jackson would only pick his supporters. Also, when Jackson gave these jobs to his supporters, most of them were unqualified

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the generation of Andrew Jackson, he maintains an interesting variation between living the life as a highly proficient or an inadequate president of the United States. A From a variety of points of views, the era of Andrew Jackson analyzes how his choices were only made for ideal intentions. Within eight years, Andrew Jackson left behind a lasting imprint among presidency and to the American politics. He then merged the unclear union of followers who had elected him into the country 's electoral machine that would serve as a model for others.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

Jackson also adopted the Spoils System which was constitutionally unjust. The way Jackson acted showed how he was a king was by adapting the Spoils System, enacting the Indian Removal Act, and holding up congress with his vetoes. The first reason that Andrew Jackson was more of a king is he ignored Congress. In 1830, Andrew Jackson made the Indians sell their land, and forced them to reservations west of the Mississippi river.

Read More

More about Why Was Andrew Jackson A Good King

Related Topics

Open Document