William James Argument Against Religious Belief

247 Words1 Pages
William James argues that it should not be frowned upon for people to believe in something without sufficient evidence, such as religion. His main argument is that there are life decisions that can be determined by morals and the degree of the option. According to James, Religious belief is a forced and momentous option, justifying that it is not wrong to be affiliated with religion although it cannot serve as evidence towards another belief. I believe that James did not efficiently justify religious belief to me. Although I do not completely agree with James, he defends religious belief by claiming, “at bottom, what have you to lose?” He sees the idea to side with God as a comfort that I do not completely disagree with. However, God and religion