ipl-logo

Zinn Compare Contrast Analysis

730 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Interstate Commerce Act vs Sherman Antitrust Act and their legality

Compare the perspectives of both Zinn and Pageant on the government 's attempt to curb big businesses’ corruption. In comparing, evaluate the commitment government had on curbing big businesses’ corruption. After the Civil War, the United State of America underwent an industrial revolution. More and more machines were used in factories; steel production rose significantly and helped build railroads and infrastructure; oil started to light streets and homes; and various other innovations increased efficiency and impacted everyone’s lives. In this process, many multimillionaires emerged and owners of large businesses started exploiting their power and bribed the government for favorable legislation in return. This led to more support for government …show more content…

Zinn believed that the government legislation was unsuccessful; however, the Pageant argued that the legislation, though somewhat ineffective, was a good attempt to curb big businesses’ corruption. According to Zinn, the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887 was intended to supervise the railroads; nonetheless, the act was only used to satisfy the public’s support for government regulation of railroads, but it never actually accomplished anything. It only made railroads more popular because the citizens believed that it was more regulated, when in reality, it was not. Moreover, another government legislation, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, was supposed to protect trade and commerce and make monopolies illegal. However, the Court interpreted the Act in a way that made it harmless, and instead used it go against interstate strikes, since they restricted trade, revealing how unsuccessful the government legislation was at curbing businesses’ corruption. On the other hand, according to the Pageant, the Interstate Commerce Act, though not revolutionary, helped stabilize the businesses. The Pageant felt that the Act was still a significant red-letter law, and it did prove to be a good stepping stone for an effective legislation that curbed corruption. Furthermore, the Pageant believed that even though the Sherman Anti-Trust Act had legal loopholes, it still threatened the power of the monopolistic businesses and introduced a revolutionary principle. Unlike the perspective of Zinn, the Pageant argued that both these acts helped start the transformation from private greed to public need, while Zinn strongly believed that the government legislation was not effective at curbing the corruption, highlighting a difference in perspective. Even though it is true that these acts did set examples for more effective legislation, these acts were still not helpful and did not actually tackle the

Show More
Related
1596 Words | 7 Pages

The passing of the Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act proves that Taft did a poor job remaining strong in his beliefs. Instead of sticking to his beliefs and advocating for lower tariffs, Taft gave into persuasion and temptation. In an effort to try and please everyone, Taft accidentally angered a lot of people. Taft was not a strong leader.

Read More
939 Words | 4 Pages

Thesis : After the Civil War, America was in a post-war boom. During the 1870-1890, big business moguls, such as Rockefeller and Carnegie, create huge corporations which not only affected the economy, but also affected the political realm of America. While many may assume that during the rise of these big business helped to change the economy and politics,  the real focus was on the responses formed by society, such as labor unions, increase public outcry, and political opposition groups that helped to change society. A: Economically, big business flourished during the late 1800s.

Read More
815 Words | 4 Pages

Big businesses were more powerful than the national government due to trusts. Establishing trusts allowed for these big businesses to run their competition out of business and raise the price of a given product. Thus, consumers had no other option but to

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

After reading chapter 7 of Zinn’s book, I began to realize that a good president really does matter. Take Andrew Jackson for example, he was a president who passed the “Indian Removal Act of 1830,” driving the Native American southeast of the United States. This caused the death of thousands of Indians, commonly known as the Trail of Tears. He was also an arrogant person who can’t keep his promises with the Creeks, burning down their village, killing men, women and children. He was also a slave trader.

Read More
413 Words | 2 Pages

During the 1877 through 1920 the government's role wasn't really expanding, instead people were getting furious that the government weren't really doing anything to improve life so they started going on strikes, making unions, and bringing people of different cause together to try to force the government into being useful. However, this only led to political corruption, people saying they would do something to help the people and people would believe and put their trust into this "person" to only be blackmailed in the end. These "people" were called political bosses and they had their little organization or political machines and people would do them favors to gain jobs or etc. This growing "government" was a mixed bag for the American people,

Read More
966 Words | 4 Pages

The first section states, essentially, that any contract that will restrict trade between states and/or foreign nations is illegal. The second section states that anyone who attempts to monopolize a market has committed a felony. While these two may sound quite similar, there is one major distinction between the two. The first section is concerned primarily with contracts that restrain trade, whereas the second section is more concerned with the structural elements of monopolies.

Read More
157 Words | 1 Pages

Both authors use the type of language and tone that try to persuade us, the readers, to makes us believe what they claim is true relying on evidence and using them to their convenience. Schweikart and Allen want to make us believe that Native Americans have that weakness on adaptation, a deficiency that make the reader think the authors objective is to justify the fact that the Natives Americans were mistreated by the Americans. On the other hand, Zinn uses a tone that make us believe that Americans are liars and selfish. The Americans in other words took advantage of the Indians, making it seem like the Indians were easily persuade just so they can fit in with the Americans, even though what they were promised was never going to become a reality.

Read More
575 Words | 3 Pages

This essay will generally analyze the relationship between the government and businesses, and how “Big Business” essentially took control of the Gilded Age. America’s first true big business mostly arose because of the railroads, which is fairly significant, because it essentially helped lead the development of other business barons such as, John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, and J. Pierpont Morgan who all had particularly extraordinary accomplishments in shaping our economy. Most of these men who created big businesses after the Civil War were driven by a compelling desire to become rich and influential.

Read More
115 Words | 1 Pages

it has to be that the government was expanded in ways that had never been seen before and continues to this day to do so.

Read More
1017 Words | 5 Pages

In the post-Civil War United States corporations grew significantly in number, size and influence. Big business had a major impact on the economy and politics in America resulting in changes for many American citizens. As been noted, one way in

Read More
535 Words | 3 Pages

The growing of large businesses in size, number, and influenced changed the United States severely. The economy was greatly relieved but the politicians were corrupted and the people very unhappy. The businesses were smart in using the reduction and increasing of prices to link all the businesses but taking advantage of the people by silencing them and increasing their labor hours really hurt them. It also did not help that the politicians that were corrupted made bad decisions for money and no the

Read More
906 Words | 4 Pages

This act was enacted to clarify and define what constituted “monopolistic” activities. It protected the activities of labor unions and prohibited directors from serving in boards of competing

Read More
422 Words | 2 Pages

Both a successful banker and a financier who brought organization to the national economy, J.P. Morgan had a major impact on the advancement and prosperity of the United States. Through the funding of railroads, Morgan aided in the construction of new systems which in turn provided for fast and easy transportation of goods, people, and livestock. He then went one step forward and linked railroads to each other, all of them to banks, and banks to insurance companies, which enabled the railroads to be easily funded by the banks. Despite his positive achievements that heavily impacted the U.S., Zinn presents Morgan’s achievements and character in a negative fashion. Zinn includes a statement written by Gustavus Myers describing how Morgan and other companies were in cahoots to monopolize the railroads and eliminate fair competition; thus, at the detriment of the people of the country.

Read More
753 Words | 4 Pages

Many laws and regulations were utilized to help bring about citizens being involved in government decisions. For example, the direct primary allowed citizens to directly vote for government officials. Laws could also be passed with initiatives. Citizens who wanted a certain new law could set up petitions for people to sign. If enough people signed the petition the government would have to vote on whether or not the law would be passed.

Read More
138 Words | 1 Pages

Bruce Catton is a nationally recognized expert on the Civil War in the United States of America. In "Grant and Lee: a study in contrasts" the author shows us differencies and similarities of two main opponents in the Civil War. Despite of different backgrounds, personalities and underlying aspirations of different origins and natures of two diametrically opposed elements in American life, each of them was a valiant defender of his ideas and absorbed the advantages and disadvantages of the people he led. Grant and Lee were marvelous fighters with similar fighting qualities, an utter tenacity and fidelity, an ability to think faster and move faster than the enemy, a courage and resourcefulness and the ability to turn quickly from war to peace

Read More

More about Zinn Compare Contrast Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document